iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ulrich_von_Wilamowitz-Moellendorff
Talk:Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff - Wikipedia Jump to content

Talk:Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

A good, much-needed fresh start here would translate the German Wikipedia article. Wetman 23:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The French article is also more complete, and more information would be very apreciated here! --Leonardo T. de Oliveira 08:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nietzsche

[edit]

Too bad his polemic against Nietzsche isn't available.Lestrade 01:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Here ‘tis, thanks to Babette Babich et al. 96.235.173.81 (talk) 18:24, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Fredo Corleonski[reply]

Translation

[edit]

Translated the German page. Hope it's useful. athinaios 19:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Wichard Joachim Heinrich von Möllendorf adopted Ulrich's ancestors" This is opaque to me; as it stands it has such an unlikely Mormon ring to it. What happened in this case? Who was adopted?--Wetman (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The German article has improved since October 2007. It has reached featured article status, occurred on the main page at Wilamowitz' 160th birthday and was peer-reviewed in December 2008. I recommend you translate it again :) Yours, Jonathan Groß (talk) 14:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pasquali

[edit]

I have added Giorgio Pasquali as a notable student of Wilamowitz (cf. PASQUALI, Giorgio. Storia della tradizione e critica del testo. Firenze: Arnoldo Mondadori, 1974). While Pasquali does not have a WIkipedia entry yet (I will probably work on that), he certainly deserves to figure in the list: he is probably the best known and most important italian philologist and his book "Storia della tradizione..." not only has been translated into many languages, but even though it was published in 1952 is still valued for many of his insights in the field of textual criticism. tresoldi (talk) 17:55, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Postclassicism?

[edit]

I have a doubt: in "Achievements", it is said that: "As a representative of Postclassicism, he concentrated less on literary history but rather aimed to extract biographical information on the respective authors from the preserved texts". What is meant here by "Postclassicism"? Thanks. Leonardo T. Oliveira (talk) 14:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]