iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Oprah_Winfrey
Talk:Oprah Winfrey - Wikipedia Jump to content

Talk:Oprah Winfrey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeOprah Winfrey was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 4, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
July 6, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee


Oprah Ancestry

[edit]

According to the links:

http://ethnicelebs.com/oprah-winfrey www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw43kWEKjn8

Oprah Winfery has both Liberian and Zambian ancestry. She comes from the Nkoya people, a tribe in Southern Zambia.

Semi-protected edit request on 29 December 2023

[edit]

Early Life 4th paragraph reference is not formatted correctly. 68.112.3.142 (talk) 18:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thank you Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2024

[edit]

Change _little text law_ to _title case law_ 2600:1702:AE0:24C0:5C11:AE34:B837:C282 (talk) 12:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

[edit]

Shouldn't that be added due to recent events? 2601:280:C77F:71A0:E1D2:CB03:99FF:E453 (talk) 04:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DNA tests

[edit]

@User:Morbidthoughts A basic level of literacy on matters of Native American identity isn't a tall order, and knowing that DNA tests don't reliably determine Indigeneity claims is the most basic of basic details. I would be shocked if you didn't already know this. It is baseless, and frankly weird, to classify someone as a person "of Native American descent" based solely on the self-reported results of a DNA test. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 06:53, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not self-reported. It was independently checked through third parties. I'm surprised you don't understand that. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Morbidthoughts The category "American people of Native American descent" for this article cannot stand. That's just insulting to Native Americans. Please remove it. If you do not, we go to ARBCOM. When it comes to this level of racism, there really has to be a line drawn in the sand. This is not okay. This is an intolerable level of distortion of Native American identity. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 07:37, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am sympathetic to the impact this can cause to the Native communities but Wikipedia is a reflection of what reliable sources explicitly say. Any introduction of self-identification into the article text or category is original research without explicit support from independent RS. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really feel strongly about this because categories are really only of interest to other editors not readers. However I don't think the concept that someone can have Native American ancestry without identifying as Native American is racist or insulting to Native Americans. As the category description states, it is intended for "Americans who have proof of Native American ancestry but are not members of any Native American tribes". If there's an issue with this system of categorisation as a whole then take it to WP:CfD. It seems like a double standard to include Oprah in Category:American people of Kpelle descent but in a Native American descent category, given both are derived from the same DNA test. Threats of taking people to ARBCOM for a single revert are also unhelpful and unnecessary. I T B F 💬 08:18, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ARBCOM/ABE is not coming from a vacuum.[1] Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The cited book uses the term "Native American" but not in the way Wikipedia uses the term, i.e. Native Americans in the United States. I added a link to Indigenous peoples of the Americas and to explain that concept: "DNA tests stand on shaky ground to define Native American identity", a helpful 101 on the subject. General DNA tests cannot pinpoint specific tribes and in this instance can't distinguish between Native Americans in the United States and other groups who are Indigenous peoples of the Americas. To make a leap that Oprah specifically descends from Native Americans in the United States, would require much more information than has been published and would be WP:OR. User talk:ITBF, "Native American" is a unique political status within the United States (even the Supreme Court substantiated that 9-2 in the ruling in the Haaland v. Brackeen) (More about "Native American" status in the United States, "Native Americans are the only census-defined 'racial' group that is also a political and legal classification." Yuchitown (talk) 17:18, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have revised your edit to reframe the issues as a note using an academic source that specifically discusses Oprah. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's helpful. I restored the appropriate term Indigenous peoples of the Americas and my citation discussing the issue. Yuchitown (talk) 02:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like WP:SYN to cite an article that does not discuss Winfrey to interpret what the results about Winfrey was actually indicating. Even the Carey article doesn't really discuss Indigenous people outside of North America and saying that those larger groups (North v. South v. Central (?)) can't be distinguished from each other seems to contradict the Genetic history of the Indigenous peoples of the Americas article. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, remove the citation if you must, but there's no good reason to remove the term for the good of people actually being dealt with in the DNA. BTW Central America is part of North America. Genetic history of the Indigenous peoples of the Americas does not say that DNA tests can distinguish between people who are Native Americans in the United States and those in neighboring countries, especially with historic displacements. Yuchitown (talk) 13:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I'm misreading "Observed is a decreasing genetic diversity as geographic distance from the Bering Strait occurs" to where "There is a relative lack of differentiation between Mesoamerican and Andean populations" and "The authors also provided evidence that the basal northern and southern Indigenous American branches, to which all other Indigenous peoples belong, diverged around 16,000 years ago." in that you can differentiate Indigenous from North America (U.S, Canada, and Mexico) from those Central and South America. Morbidthoughts (talk) 16:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those quotes point to a "lack of differentiation," so stating that one cannot differentiate (the point that I am making). But more to the point, a DNA test cannot differentiate between Ojibwe people from Canada and Ojibwe people from the United States or between Cocopah people from the United States and Cocopah people from Mexico. Yuchitown (talk) 17:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But the question is whether DNA tests can differentiate Indigenous people from North America versus anything south of that? I don't have any issue with the broader Americas link but am unclear if that's what Gates meant since the Daedalus article didn't make that clarification either. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
South America is fairly irrelevant here. Yuchitown (talk) 00:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]