iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Content_(media)
Talk:Content (media) - Wikipedia Jump to content

Talk:Content (media)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I copied and pasted from user sandbox to the main article. Gianni dejesus (talk) 22:07, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I’m sandbox Aitch7 (talk) 04:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 September 2021 and 1 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gianni dejesus.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is a specific individual movie or video game referred to as "content?"

[edit]

title.

(that's how to fill out a message body with "title" btw - there's no need to write a message body if there's no need to elaborate on your message heading/title) 99.229.43.127 (talk) 17:06, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Media (communication)

[edit]

Neither of these articles is particularly well-focused or sourced, but it doesn't really seem necessary to me to distinguish between the two. What would be the difference -- without looking at the articles -- between "content (media)" and "media (communications)"? There was a very large amount of irrelevant content in this article, most of which was uncited (and which I removed); the rest was about Mass media regulation, which I moved to said article. I don't think it makes sense to have this sort of combinatorial subdivision (you could have Communication (media), Content (communications), Media (content) etc) for terms that, in the actual articles, are being more or less treated as synonyms. jp×g🗯️ 03:09, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Surely one of the dozen WikiProjects monitoring and responsible for this article will come to the rescue and actually write some content about this high-importance topic! wbm1058 (talk) 12:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot see how a credible article could be created on this topic. The article should be deleted with the rationale WP:NOTDICT.TheLongTone (talk) 15:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see no disagreement above, so I have restored the redirect. If it is undone again, then a more formal discussion could be initiated to get some closure.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 04:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]