Talk:Airside (company)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

no consensus, 8 July 2017, see discussion.
keep, 5 January 2008, see discussion.

Why is there a Wikipedia article on a company which is noted for.... exactly nothing? It's possible that Airside have their own paid insider to protect their page. I know that pornsites do this but......... ho hum. If every single company had their own wikipedia page, there's never be room for anything else! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.21.11.98 (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any article about companies should state its significance. The present content fails to do so and it falls now under WP:CSD #11 or better known as WP:SPAM. --Efe (talk) 13:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well nominations for BAFTAs and being featured by Apple works for me. I'll remove the template. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Airside (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091201091421/http://www.airside.co.uk:80/about to http://www.airside.co.uk/about/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Question.

Question on this part as this has been done. I am not sure how to respond or understand. Need Admin help.DGG Light2021 (talk) 16:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]