iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hood_film
Hood film - Wikipedia Jump to content

Hood film

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hood film
Director John Singleton, one of the pioneers of the genre.
Years active1990s
LocationUnited States
Major figuresHughes Brothers, Ernest Dickerson, F. Gary Gray, Spike Lee, John Singleton, Mario Van Peebles
InfluencesBlaxploitation, L.A. Rebellion, Mexploitation, Race film

Hood film is a 1990s film genre originating in the United States, which features aspects of urban African American or Hispanic American culture. John Singleton, Mario Van Peebles, F. Gary Gray, Hughes Brothers, and Spike Lee are all directors who have created work typically classified as part of this genre.[1] The genre has been identified as a sub-genre of the gangster film genre.[2]

The genre has since spread outside the U.S., to places such as the United Kingdom and Canada.[3][4]

Hood films have been variously described under a wide-array of names by critics, such as 'street-gang', 'ghetto-centric', 'action-crime-adventure', 'gangsta rap films', 'black action films', 'new black realism', 'new jack cinema', and 'black urban cinema'. Spike Lee disparagingly referred to the genre as 'hiphop, urban drama, ghetto film'.[5][6][7][8]

Criteria

[edit]

Characteristics include hip hop music (including gangsta rap), street gangs, racial discrimination, organized crime/gangster, gang affiliation scenes, drug use and trafficking, and the problems of young people coming of age or struggling amid the relative poverty and violent neighborhoods.[9][6] Hood films tell predominantly masculine stories, however some films within the genre (such as Set It Off) have women-focused stories.[2]

British hood films also use music genres such as grime, and generally depict aspects of urban Black British culture, particularly within inner-city London.[3]

Critical definitions

[edit]

Critic Murray Forman notes that the "spatial logic" of hip-hop culture, with heavy emphasis on place-based identity, locates "black youth urban experience within an environment of continual proximate danger," and this quality defines the hood film.[1] In a 1992 essay in Cineaction, Canadian critic Rinaldo Walcott identified the hood film's primary concerns as issues of masculinity and "(re)gaining manhood for black men."[10]

History

[edit]

Early notable releases in the hood film genre include Colors (1988) and Do the Right Thing (1989).[11][9] The latter in particular has been credited with ushering in the hood film zeitgeist in the 1990s due to its popular success.[6]

Critics such as Murray Forman have credited the popular emergence of hood-films with the simultaneous emergence of gangsta rap as a popular music genre in the 1990s, wherein the hood film genre reached the height of its popularity due to the acclaim of the films New Jack City, Boyz n the Hood, Juice, the Sundance-winning Straight Out of Brooklyn and Menace II Society.[12] Gangsta rap and hood films formed a symbiotic relationship, and many rappers of the era appeared in popular hood films at the time.[9][13][14] With the plethora of films both dramas and comedies, hood films of the 1990s are in a sense neo-Blaxploitation films and Mexploitation films.[15][16][17] The genre has also been parodied with such films as Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood[18] and Friday.

By the mid-1990s, the hood film popular zeitgeist largely came to an end,[7][14][19] however, hood films would continue to be released through the late 1990s and 2000s, albeit on a smaller scale and poorer box-office results. These hood films often have low production costs.[6] Celeste A. Fisher credited this decline to general fatigue felt towards the genre, due to the lack of diversity in "images, settings, and themes".[2] Many low-budget, straight-to-DVD hood films were released in the late 1990s and through the 2000s, such as I'm Bout It, Leprechaun in the Hood and Hood of the Living Dead. Many of these films stripped back the social and political messaging that was present in their 1990s forebears, while continuing to capitalise on the 'hood film' formula.[20][21]

On the contrary, while hood films were falling out of popularity in the United States, it would experience a brief popular emergence in the UK led by British filmmakers such as Noel Clarke. Bullet Boy, released in 2004, is generally recognised to be the first notable example of a British hood film. Kidulthood, released in 2006, is credited with popularising the British hood film genre, leading to a swathe of imitators in the years following. By the mid-2010s, the British hood film genre largely faded out of mainstream popularity, however, a TV series which carried heavy influences from the genre, Top Boy, gained international acclaim during this period.[3]

The mid-2010s saw a small revival of the genre, with popular releases such as Girlhood and Straight Outta Compton. This wave of hood films was dubbed a 'rebirth' of the genre by Dazed.[19]

Criticism

[edit]

Hood films have received criticism for alleged glorification of criminality and gangsterism. The genre has also been criticised for perpetuating the idea that young, black males are violent, sexist, or gangsters, despite the well-meaning intent behind some films within the genre to bring awareness to issues such as poverty, political alienation and the varying effects of institutional racism.[9][22][23] Norman K. Denzin explained:[6]

These realistic social-problem texts fuelled conservative racist discourse. They helped fearful white Americans blame blacks for the problems of the inner city. They suggested that blacks caused their own problems. The problems of the ghetto were not shared by the larger society.

Research findings have noted that positive representations of women in the genre are almost non-existent, and women are often depicted in degrading roles.[23]

Legacy

[edit]

The Academy Award–nominated classics Do the Right Thing and Boyz n the Hood were each inducted into the National Film Registry.[24]

The latter film topped the "Top Black Films of All Times" poll in the November 1998 issue of Ebony magazine.[25]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Forman, Murray (2002). The 'Hood Comes First: race, space, and place in rap and hip-hop. Wesleyan University Press.
  2. ^ a b c "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-07-31. Retrieved 2022-07-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  3. ^ a b c "An Introduction To UK Hood Movies". Complex. Retrieved 2022-06-04.
  4. ^ Working on screen : representations of the working class in Canadian cinema. Malek Khouri, Darrell Varga. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2006. ISBN 978-1-4426-8368-6. OCLC 666901575.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  5. ^ deWaard, Andrew (2012). Richardson, Chris; Skott-Myhre, Hans A. (eds.). "The Hood is Where the Heart is: Melodrama, Habitus, and the Hood Film" (PDF). Intellect. ISBN 978-1-84150-479-7. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-09-20. Retrieved 2022-07-30.
  6. ^ a b c d e Munby, Jonathan (2007), Chapman, James; Glancy, Mark; Harper, Sue (eds.), "From Gangsta to Gangster: The Hood Film's Criminal Allegiance with Hollywood", The New Film History: Sources, Methods, Approaches, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 166–179, doi:10.1007/9780230206229_12, ISBN 978-0-230-20622-9, retrieved 2022-08-01
  7. ^ a b Fisher, Celeste A. (2006). Black on black : urban youth films and the multicultural audience. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-1-4616-5688-3. OCLC 834500673.
  8. ^ Screening the city. Mark Shiel, Tony Fitzmaurice. London: Verso. 2003. ISBN 978-1-85984-690-2. OCLC 51068449.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  9. ^ a b c d Przemieniecki, Christopher J. (2012). 'reel' Gangs Or 'real' Gangs: A Qualitative Media Analysis Of Street Gangs Portrayed In Hollywood Films, 1960-2009 (PhD dissertation). University of North Dakota.
  10. ^ McCullough, John (2006). "Rude and the Representation of Class Relations in Canadian Film". Working on Screen: Representations of the Working Class in Canadian Cinema. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 9780802093882. Archived from the original on 2022-06-04. Retrieved 2020-12-11.
  11. ^ Schultz, Ian (2015-08-18). "Blu-Ray Review - Colors (1988)". Retrieved 2022-08-01.
  12. ^ Menace II Society: The Truth Hurts|Current|The Criterion Collection
  13. ^ From The Harder They Come to Yardie
  14. ^ a b Donalson, Melvin (2007). Hip Hop in American Cinema. Peter Lang. ISBN 978-0-8204-6345-2.
  15. ^ ""Menace II Society" – Cineaste". Archived from the original on 2006-09-08. Retrieved 2006-08-17.
  16. ^ Which Way to the Promised Land?: Spike Lee's Clockers and the Legacy of the African American City Archived 2006-06-25 at the Wayback Machine, Paula J. Massood, African American Review, Summer 2001
  17. ^ "Lowering the bar: State of black film at the moment". Archived from the original on 2006-10-26. Retrieved 2007-02-17.
  18. ^ Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood | 10 Movies With Very Long Titles | TIME.com
  19. ^ a b Dazed (2015-06-11). "The rebirth of the hood film". Dazed. Retrieved 2022-08-01.
  20. ^ African Americans and popular culture. Todd Boyd. Westport, Conn.: Praeger. 2008. ISBN 978-0-313-06408-1. OCLC 428541452.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  21. ^ Metcalf, Josephine (2014). Rapper, writer, pop-cultural player : ice-T and the politics of Black cultural production. Will Turner. Burlington. ISBN 978-1-4724-1835-7. OCLC 877868409.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  22. ^ Pierson, Eric (1997). "Black on Black Crime: Hollywood's Construction of the Hood" (PDF). University of Illinois at Urbana. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-12-04. Retrieved 2022-07-30.
  23. ^ a b Bonaparte, Rachel (2010). Representation of African American Youth in Menace II Society (MA thesis). Miami University. Archived from the original on 2021-10-05. Retrieved 2022-08-19.
  24. ^ Brief Prescription and Expanded Essays of National Film Registry Titles|Library of Congress
  25. ^ Ebony. Johnson Publishing Company. November 1998. pp. 154–162.