Zordrac

User talk:Zordrac/Archive1:Dates: 24 November 2005 - 24 December 2005 :Posts: 95

User talk:Zordrac/Archive2:Dates: 25 December 2005 - 25 February 2007 :Posts: ?

Okay so I stuffed up the move. I haven't used the thing for over a year, give me a break. If someone can fix it up (some admin or something), it would be much appreciated. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 07:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

By fiat, this user has been banned indefinitely (for the same reasons Wikipedia banned User:Daniel Brandt, among other things) Ashibaka (tock) 01:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

I am still awaiting an apology for the treatment that I received here. The reasons given for the ban may not be the actual reasons for the ban... Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 02:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Ban review

If anyone is reviewing the ban on this user, please contact me directly. Unless you are a member of the arbitration committee, it is probably inappropriate for you to lift this ban and you should instead refer this user there. --Yamla 17:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Proposed decline

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Ew-too, which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! 198.228.228.46 (talk) 01:06, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Ew-too for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ew-too is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ew-too until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EternalFlare (talk • contribs) 20:06, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Fortune Lounge Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fortune Lounge Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortune Lounge Group (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Cat Chat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cat Chat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Chat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Surfers (talker) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surfers (talker) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surfers (talker) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 00:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Zordrac/helping

User:Zordrac/helping, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zordrac/helping and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Zordrac/helping during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 13:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Zordrac/deletions

User:Zordrac/deletions, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zordrac/deletions and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Zordrac/deletions during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 13:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)