iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ssbohio
User talk:Ssbohio - Wikipedia

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-en@wikimedia.org).


Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

Possibly unfree File:Ohio Uniform Traffic Ticket.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ohio Uniform Traffic Ticket.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Ken Gourlay & Justin Berry.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Ken Gourlay & Justin Berry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Camp CAEN

edit
 

The article Camp CAEN has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (organizations) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:52, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of V. L. B. Janakiammal College of Engineering and Technology

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on V. L. B. Janakiammal College of Engineering and Technology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skcet.ac.in/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 04:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Noonday Demon) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Noonday Demon, Ssbohio!

Wikipedia editor Krishna Chaitanya Velaga just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Needs citations

To reply, leave a comment on Krishna Chaitanya Velaga's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:39, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:NRHP listing

edit

 Template:NRHP listing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 13:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Simon Dumenco listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Simon Dumenco. Since you had some involvement with the Simon Dumenco redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:00, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

"John F. Kennedy assassination/Archive 4" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John F. Kennedy assassination/Archive 4. Since you had some involvement with the John F. Kennedy assassination/Archive 4 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 27 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Human Race Theatre Company for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Human Race Theatre Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Race Theatre Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SL93 (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Loft Theatre for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loft Theatre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loft Theatre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SL93 (talk) 23:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply