iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dcupdates11
User talk:Dcupdates11 - Wikipedia

June 2011

edit

  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nevandc98. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 07:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

At one time I was Nevandc98, and that was a while ago, but I lost my password, and ended up having to make another account. I guarantee you it had nothing to do with being blocked from editing. Also, you CAN'T create an account when your blocked. --Dcupdates11 (talk) 17:41, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
According to the contributions log Nevandc98's last edit was on 3 May 2011, only 5 weeks ago. This account was created only 5 days into Nevandc98's 2 week block,[1][2] so you've obviously created this account from another IP address. Nice try but no cigar. --AussieLegend (talk) 18:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nevandc98 was indefinitely blocked from editing, and that means that you are indefinitely blocked from editing. You are no longer permitted to edit Wikipedia at any time for any reason, and, as each account is uncovered, it will be blocked and all the edits the account has made will be reverted. The only real alternative you have is to log in as Nevandc98, use {{unblock}}, and try to persuade someone to unblock you. Looking at the block records of the two accounts, I don't know what you could say to make anyone believe that you are capable of editing properly.—Kww(talk) 18:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Correction: Nevandc98 was only blocked for two weeks at the time you began evading the block. The account is indefinitely blocked now as a result of your use of IP addresses and alternate accounts to evade the block.—Kww(talk) 18:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Fuck you Kww, BTW: now that I can't put the RIGHT information on the pages I look at most; I will no longer be using Wikipedia. --Dcupdates11 (talk) 18:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:IRT Season 5.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:IRT Season 5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 07:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring (again)

edit
 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Disney Channel. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AussieLegend (talk) 07:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

As I have warned you previously, you need to collaborate with other users. Your edits are obviously controversial and you need to discuss the matter on the article's talk page, not simply "discuss" by way of edit summaries while reverting. As you have been warned previously, reverting continously is considered edit warring and will just result in you being blocked again, if your sockpuppetry doesn't get you first. --AussieLegend (talk) 08:15, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

DisneyFriends is responsible for starting this "editwar", he/she kept removing my USEFUL information. By the way "AussieLegend" you really need to stop bugging me. You have NO REASON for blocking me, also, you want to block someone? BLOCK DISNEYFRIENDS! --Dcupdates11 (talk) 17:46, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I suppose he was also responsible for the other edit war at So Random! that saw you blocked twice. --AussieLegend (talk) 18:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Fuck off AussieLegend. Now that I can't use Wikipedia anymore, I can tell u what I really think of you u piece of SHIT. --Dcupdates11 (talk) 18:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply