Talk:John Ford

'auteur'

LOL. THAT pompous French nonsense ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.103.107.57 (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Didn't find what I was looking for here

One tiny mention about Ford's use of shadows. Well at least it is acknowledged I guess. Problem as I see it is that the man's work is still communicating with the audience and the extensive history and Hollywood/industry info. in the article is necessary too, the reasons for the fact that this guy's work is still touching people today should be given a little more attention.TeeVeeed (talk) 21:31, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Ford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.history.navy.mil/bios/ford_john.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq81-8b.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415183637/http://www.eastmanhouse.org/museum/awards.php to http://www.eastmanhouse.org/museum/awards.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Racism

Block evasion by banned User:HarveyCarter.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The article should mention that most of his films are widely seen as racist. (81.159.6.100 (talk) 04:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC)) Most critics say he exposed racism. 1) "My position is that Ford was neither a radical reformer nor a racist. While Ford believed in equal rights for all human beings, he was also making films the settings of which, both in time and place, often demanded a depiction of racist behavior. " [Stowell, John Ford] 2) "By 1937 the NAACP had drifted from suppression toward awarding favorable citation to movies such as John Ford's Hurricane which contained antiracist messages" [Cripps 1977]; 3) "A hymn to America's nomadic soul, The Searchers is also Ford's great meditation on its troubled racist history. " [Jim Kitses - 2007]; 4) "The image of Wayne standing apart from the family that greets him serves as a springboard for Ford's harshest view of the West, which is seen as a hotbed of racist attitudes" [Jay Carr, 2002]; 5) "Ironically, Ford is frequently charged with racism, jingoism and militarism by critics who mistake his subject for his attitude. This upset Ford no end. " [Walter Wagner, 1975]. 6) "This is evident in John Ford's The Searchers, a seminal western in that it confronts the genre's racist legacy and offers a powerful interrogation of the entire mythology. " [J Brown, 2012]. Rjensen (talk) 05:56, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Missing: Ford's masterpiece

The article, although very long, tells a detailed sequence of events but sort of skips over the heavy influence that John Ford's work had on film. Nowhere is it mentioned, for instance, whether any particular work is considered a masterpiece (or perhaps a masterpiece of his Western style, etc.)

DouglasHeld (talk) 11:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Personality section

The Personality section is very long with lots of detail, but very few sources. Can someone provide them to avoid deletion of the offending material? I do not doubt its veracity, but the article still needs to conform to WP policy.Ashmoo (talk) 10:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)