This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
plot
editYes, I know the plot summary isn't all that great, but you can't just copy text from imdb. There have been several versions of this page that use reviews from there. Not allowed. -Freekee 05:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
I removed some inaccurate information. Gris never accidentally breaks the statue. A guy sent to find the statue breaks it a little, removing the statue's eye. Gris notices that the statue is hollow because bugs crawl out of the hole where its eye was, which leads him to take the statue from its base. This is when he discovers the device hidden in the base of the statue. Iregretthisname 03:15, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
The plot on here is pretty much entirely filled with incorrect information. However, the only way to really make it make sense and actually follow the plot of the film is to make it much longer and more detaild which for some bizarre reason is a no-no on Wikipedia. Because god forbid a site that is supposed to be a repository of information provide detailed information about something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C1:B902:4701:9D2B:2762:67AE:75AE (talk) 19:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- An encyclopedia with every statement based on a Reliable Source that can be verified, not a "repository of information." 50.111.40.79 (talk) 07:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio
editThe following plot summaries were written by the listed authors, and appear at IMDb. To republish them here is a violation of Wikipedia policy, and is considered a copyright violation. See WP:Copyrights.
(Removed)
If you find this article to be using either of these two summaries, please either revert the article to a version that does not, or (preferably), write your own summary. -Freekee 23:13, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
I've just rewritten the plot. I deliberately did NOT read the summary in question until after I saved it.
Gardener of Geda 10:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Excellent. Thanks! This is a much better summary, and we shouldn't have any more copyvio trouble. -Freekee 21:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. I agree with the edits you made.
- I'm glad you think so. I can't write all that well myself, but I always know just how to fix everyone else's stuff. *rolls eyes* I can be pretty annoying. :-) -Freekee 03:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
What language(s)?
editDoes the film really combine Spanish and English with large amounts of each? If the film is actually mostly in one language and just available in the other language due to dubbing, please put the film's original language in the info box instead of the original langauge plus the dubbing language. Gronky 12:19, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
It was filmed with large helpings of both languages. There are several scenes where Perlman engages in conversations where he speaks English, while the other conversant speaks Spanish. 71.52.46.122 (talk) 14:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Cronos (poster).jpg
editImage:Cronos (poster).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cronos (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140403093721/http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=1993 to http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=1993
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)