User talk:Graeme Bartlett/archive 32

	Older talk is in the archives. Please add new talk at the bottom of the page.

page Giovanni Guida

Dearest administrator Bartlett, I need your great help. the Wikipedia page "Giovanni Guida" has been reported for deletion. The artist is known throughout the world for his scratching technique (grattage). can you help me not to have the page deleted. Thanks

I will take a look at the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! God bless you! it was made the mistake of inserting the artist's image in many pages of Wikipedia .. but requesting the cancellation of the page is excessive. Thanks again.

The biggest issue appears to be, are you or user:Guigen or user:Frangpan working for, or paid by Giovanni Guida? If so read WP:PAID and make a formal disclosure. The second issue, to show notability, there needs to be substantial coverage writing about Giovanni Guida or his work, by independent writers. This does not mean that any page that uses one of his artworks counts. But a page that discussed an artwork would count. Also place your reasons to keep that page here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giovanni Guida. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:57, 1 December 2020 (UTC) dearest administrator, thank you very much for your precious help! Yes, the user "Frangpan" has inserted the images on the pages, but only and exclusively to contribute to the iconographic research, no promotion or payment. Obviously it was a mistake in good faith! As for the coverage, the artist's works have been described by journalists and writers of the most important Italian newspapers (below I put the link). Please help me and if it is necessary to modify the text of the page .. but do not delete it as the artist is known in the world for this pictorial technique and his icon has been exhibited in many important museums, basilicas and cathedrals in the world by museum directors, cardinals and bishops. Thanks a lot! I hope to receive your help and your source verification. here are the links: • https://www.ilmattino.it/napolismart/cultura/coronavirus_illustrazione_artista_campano_virale-5170287.html • https://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2019/05/08/salvini-e-di-maio-tetrarchi-guida--in-quellabbraccio-convenienzaNapoli17.html • https://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2020/07/04/lopera-san-gennaro-in-grattageNapoli05.html?ref=search • https://www.corriereitaliano.com/cultura/arte-e-spettacolo/7050/unopera-darte-per-sconfiggere-la-pandemia/ • http://economymag.virtualcms.it/news/2018/05/03/news/il-viaggio-nel-mondo-dell-icona-di-san-cesario-di-terracina-1254/ • https://veryimportantlot.com/ru/news/blog/grattazh • https://rynekisztuka.pl/2019/07/10/egzotyczne-pojecie-grataz/

                              Dear administrator, I wrote the notes (also that of the book) in the discussion for the proposed deletion of the page. I hope to receive your precious help! Thank you very much and sorry for the inconvenience.

Messages

Thanks Graeme! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdainko (talk • contribs) 22:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

hi can you please give more information on why NGS Super page was deleted when similar superfunds such as australian super have written in the same tone and still have their page live?HannahNGS2020 (talk) 04:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

@HannahNGS2020: The page was not actually deleted, but instead was moved to Draft:NGS Super. When it was moved the reason given was "Corporate article with COI and PROMO concerns, incubate in draftspace". To address this you must disclose if you are being paid to write this page or are working for this organisation. You can do this on your user page User:HannahNGS2020. The "NGS" in your username strongly suggests that you have a connection. The instructions are at WP:Paid. What I deleted was just a Redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

hi graeme, thanks for your help here as I am new to this. I have disclosed that I work for the company on my user page and have set my notifications so that anyone can see any edits that I make. I am employed by NGS and so not specifically being paid to post on wikipedia but the guidelines suggest I need to include

on my talk page if I work for the company. Could you let me know if this is necessary or if what I have already done is enough? Many thanks, Hannah HannahNGS2020 (talk) 22:55, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi graeme, would you mind helping me in knowing how I can try and get the page from drafts back into a live environment please? Thanks, Hannah HannahNGS2020 (talk) 22:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

@HannahNGS2020: What you would have to do with Draft:NGS Super is to make it less targeted at attracting investors and be more about the company. If it is based on what independent writers have written, then bias is reduced. When the article is read for review, click on "Submit your draft for review". Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Graeme, I have made the relevant changes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:NGS_Super i cannot see where to submit for review could you please help? HannahNGS2020 (talk) 23:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC) Hi Graeme Bartlett please see my message above - how do i know if my draft page is reviewed and may go live? Thanks, Hannah HannahNGS2020 (talk) 03:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi Graeme Bartlett. I am new to editing wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicole_Couch owns the rites to the photo i uploaded. I am Nicoles Manager and I own her record label. she owns all the rights and wanted me to add her pic she sent me. please help me get this sorted so its correct thank you Philip H Taylor (talk) 11:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Graeme Bartlett. Nicole is not paying for any edits she asked me to upload her pic. there is no fees for doing so it is free. Thank you Philip H Taylor (talk) 21:11, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Archived discussion still continued by The writer of Methyl hexanoate

Hi Graeme. It seems you archived Methyl Hexanoate discussion. I wanted you to help here. Thanks.Nihaal The Wikipedian (talk) 14:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Please fix the Properties or add it. Nihaal The Wikipedian (talk) 07:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

That page still needs more references from suitable sources. I added the Chembox Properties template. It uses parameters like C=6 N=2 ... Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:42, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

I have found a problem in Methyl hexanoate. DMacks has constantly been reverting my picture uploads. The first one I can forgive but the second time,I uploaded a good sized photo but still the user reverted it again. I suspect edit warring for this, please suspect any problem.Nihaal The Wikipedian (talk) 14:55, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

@Nihaal The Wikipedian:He's not edit warring but trying to be helpful. The space-filling picture should not go top right on the article page but be within the chembox, as I've already mentioned on your user page. DMacks also thought that the picture was poor owing to the way that some C-H bonds were depicted and I agree (Graeme, see [1]). Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 16:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Nihaal The Wikipedian has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Nereistoxin, cartap etc.

Hi Graeme. I have just created a page for Nereistoxin after looking at the current very scant one for Cartap. I decided that there are a number of minor insecticides that were commercialised but are propesticides for the parent natural product. Would you be good enough to take a look at the new page and give it a rating on its talk page? I now want to create a redirect from Cartap to Nereistoxin, effectively removing the present content of the former. Is it OK just to edit Cartap to make it a redirect page now, or is there some special mechanism that should be used in this case where the old page has existed for some time? Thanks. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 15:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

@Michael D. Turnbull: Under WP:Bold you can just go an change that article to a redirect. The old article may be required for attribution for those other websites that copied the text. But that is OK in the history. I see you have preserved ChemBox values, so that was good, and preserved what was of value in the article. Cartap could eventually become an article if it included production and manufacturing, and its own peculiar history of use. But as it stands you may as well redirect it. If you do redirect, change the talk page to say redirect instead of stub. Happy editing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

 Done Thanks for the advice. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 10:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Quick Question

I had recently asked for a refund of Draft:2034 in film and Draft:2035 in film. However, I had noticed that it had been restored with the initial edit by an IP and deleted for hoax. Can the two pages be deleted and restored without the IP edit? Starzoner (talk) 21:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

 Done @Starzoner: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of .585 Gehringer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article .585 Gehringer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.585 Gehringer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 16:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

David Fravor

Can you userfy this for me if there is something worth keeping there. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 16:59, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

• Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Valoem/David Fravor. Although deleted for lack of context, it was quick to find a Washington Post page, so not that obscure. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

1,2-dioxolane

Where is the style guide that says 1,2-Dioxolane should be capitalised? I'm not saying you're wrong, but it looks wrong to my eye. Compare 1-dimensional space, 2-port network. SpinningSpark 12:40, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@Spinningspark:I'm not sure there is a style guide on this (Graeme will know) but in general all chemicals, whether synthetic like pyridine or natural products like threonine should be lower case in sentences. However, all chemistry articles in WP capitalise them in article titles. Hence the article will be 1,2-Dioxolane for consistency but you should only find 1,2-dioxolane elsewhere. Incidentally, the same is sort of true for 1-dimensional space which gets redirect to One-dimensional space Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 13:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I'm talking about article titles, specifically, Graeme's move of this page. It's not self-evident to me why the "D" is capitalised when it is not the first character of the title. If the argument is that specific chemical names are treated differently from general practice then there should be a style guide saying so. The non-specific [1,2-rearrangement]] is not capitalised. SpinningSpark 13:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

What do you mean "the same is sort of true for 1-dimensional space which gets redirect to One-dimensional space"? Neither page capitalises "dimensional" so how is that possibly comparable? It is using lowercase, not uppercase which is why I pointed to it. SpinningSpark 13:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Just typing 1,2 or 1,2,3 or more-or-less any other number into the WP search box shows that all the capitalised pages are chemicals, which suggests this was something agreed many years ago. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 13:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

{{tps}} WP:MOSCHEM/NAME#Prefixes in titles, which is consistent with ACS and othe style-guides regarding that letter as "the first letter" for whatever capitalization rules apply in a given use-case. That rule does not seem to be well followed for biochemicals, so maybe WP:MED has its own standard, or no standard? There's always work to be done on WP. DMacks (talk) 13:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks DMacks for answering the query while I slept. We also keep the lower case redirect so that it can be linked from use of the name in a sentence. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:40, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tadeusz Kondrusiewicz (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tadeusz Kondrusiewicz (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

Draft:2036 in film

Hi, Its been a week since I last asksed about drafts but can i ask for the page to be deleted and resorted without the IP edits? Thanks in advance. Starzoner (talk) 13:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Self requested block

Hello, will you be willing to block me for a period of two weeks due to PTSD in rl, please remove all my rights (Including extended confirmed) to avoid issues if my account were ever to be compromised. I will rerequest the rights from you if I am back. Thank you for your consideration. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Creation of Marina Bondarko model page

Hello, I've found an article which is not on Wikipedia, it is Marina Bondarko model related article.

There are many references of Marina Bondarko on Google.

I've found one reliable source of reference, it's wedding 21 Korean magazine , march publication, do check it out.

Actually I'm new I can't write articles directly, so I told you. I think you can create this article within 5 minutes. Satyapreneur (talk) 19:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

@Satyapreneur: You can start a draft at Draft:Marina Bondarko. For biographies I recommend that you find 3 references with substantial content. Another venue is WP:RA to ask for someone to write a title. I prefer not to write about living people, as Wikipedia has extreme bias towards the living. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Ben Lamb (disambiguation) move to Ben Lamb

Can you move the disambiguation and disambiguation talk to Ben Lamb? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 08:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, can you also restore the talk for this Juan Pablo Camacho? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 10:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Can you userfy this Lauren Parsekian or restore it? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 23:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

• Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Valoem/Lauren Parsekian. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Landfall Games

Hi Graeme. On September 7th, you restored Landfall Games, an article I created in March 2017, then realised was unnotable, and finally sent to G7 in April 2018. An IP user requested the undeletion with this rationale [2]:

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below

This was their only edit, ever, and the one they performed was likely an erroneous test edit, given that they did not edit the request at all (not even the page name [3]). I was only notified of the article's restoration today and I still stand by my assessment that Landfall Games is not notable enough for Wikipedia (WP:NCORP, et al.), even if regrettably so. The article also remains in the very poor shape I did not get around to fix years ago. If possible, please delete the article again. Otherwise, it should be incubated in draftspace. This is clearly not mainspace content. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 19:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

With most of those restoration requests nothing gets done, and the rationale provided is just the default text, with no effort to say why. IPs are much harder to contact especially if they are dynamic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Either way, the current article is not (and probably never will be, due to lacking notability) suitable for mainspace, hence why I had it deleted more than two years ago. If it was up to me, I would tag it for G7 again, but I doubt that this is possible twice. IceWelder [✉] 21:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Philophrosyne (moon) § WP:WEASEL vs WP:PROMO

@Graeme Bartlett:  You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Philophrosyne (moon) § WP:WEASEL vs WP:PROMO. OrderOftheNerds (talk) 04:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Zohaib Shams

Regarding Draft:Zohaib Shams it was clearly unambiguous advertising or promotion and User:Materialscientist has deleted it as such. Theroadislong (talk) 11:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Well I will say that User:Materialscientist is careless, but I will not undelete it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure what else it could be apart from advertising? It was just two external links to his photography pages with no pretence of being a draft article. Theroadislong (talk) 11:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

It was a POC, but not really enough there to be an ad. It could have been expanded to an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Phosphorus trifluorodichloride geometry

Hi Graeme,

Could you check the source for the phosphorus–fluorine bond-lengths in this chemical? If the Cl are equatorial, then one F is equatorial and two F are axial, which would make it unlikely the P–F bonds are all the same length. DMacks (talk) 16:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

I added that bit on so that the article could have a reference, but I have found the right numbers now. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! DMacks (talk) 06:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vela Molecular Ridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue star.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Donald MacKay

I tagged this article hoping to have it renamed to Donald McDonald Mackay, as this was the way his name was rendered, and looks a little odd, as he had a pastoralist brother named Donald MacKay. It took me some time to prove this was the case (see under Family) as I have never come across living siblngs having the same (first) given name, but I am now certain of it. Did I use the wrong template? Quite possible as I've only asked for this service once before. Please reconsider. Doug butler (talk) 15:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

@Doug butler: Well I moved it now for you. You should have put the speedy delete tag on the page to replace by this, ie on Donald McDonald Mackay. However you have changed your mind about the "Mackay" part, which before was "MacKay". So let me know if it is K or k. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Graeme. My last-minute edit was unfortunate as I thought I had it wrong, and I was wrong about that. I then thought, no matter. I'll move it and automatically create a redirect, but you were ahead of me. Doug butler (talk) 00:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Same-sex marriage userboxes

In addition to !voting in the relevant MfDs, you have acted to subvert consensus by manually adding the userbox to your userpage.

Now you are making WP:INVOLVED admin actions to decline speedy deletions of User:Techie3/onemanonewoman and User:Techie3/marriagebox. I'm not sure whether CSD should apply, but someone else should do it. Clearly you took away from that MfD only that the code cannot exist in those specific locations, but it is acceptable anywhere else. That is problematic, but less problematic than declining the CSD yourself. Please self-rv. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 04:24, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

What I do with these speedy deletes, is that if they hang around for 24 hours with no other admin taking action, I then remove the tag. It appears that admins looking at the speedy delete queue were not interested in deleting or declining these. I do not agree that the consensus in the MFD was delete, and that was closed in error. All these deletion nominations are creating a toxic editing environment and the MFD and sd's should really be left alone. I will however let you add the speedy delete tags again to the User:Techie3/* pages without action from me, so that another admin can consider. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

(remove g4 delete, never previously deleted)

Strangely, the edit that created this version of the template has an edit summary reading "(Backup copy of template)". You know, a re-creation. Of something previously deleted. How does that square with your edit summary "never previously deleted"? --Calton | Talk 06:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Graeme_Bartlett_and_denying_G4s

REALLY didn't want to do this, but... come on. G4 denials on something you're heavily involved with, that are basically identical to what got deleted? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 06:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

I was looking for a reason to not delete. But I think the reason I gave was lame. perhaps not deleted by anyone else for 24 hours would be a better reason to detag. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure that substituting an equally lame rationale for the original lame rationale is much of a defense.

Also, I see that you still have the re-created userbox on your user page: will you remove it now, or does there have to be yet another MFD? --Calton | Talk 09:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

What is on my user page is not a template or user box. In the past my user page was protected to prevent easy vandalism of it, and some were blocked because of their behaviour (not by me though). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Well, it did start with "{{userbox"... No idea why you added the line about "some were blocked because of their behaviour" line, perhaps for the chilling effect, but in the end it is all sophistry and stonewalling. I have removed the userbox from your user page, I'ld suggest you start a DRV if you want these userboxes to be acceptable once again. Fram (talk) 12:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

What is on my user page is not a template or user box.

You have GOT to be kidding me: this is the line you're going to try to peddle? It is NOT a user box only in the ludicrously technical rationale that you didn't use a template, you hard-coded it. And the ONLY reason I didn't remove it directly was to give you the chance to do the right thing -- which you failed to do -- so save the veiled threats. --Calton | Talk 12:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

A nice and quiet goat gift for you!

I'm truly impressed by the loads of information you have provided us with! :) Myself, I've just done my first header, lol.

Since you probably spend lots of time working in front of your PC I want to give you this goat as a little company. She will never bother you at the wrong time!

Thank you for sharing your knowledge with others and, please, keep up the good work as long as you enjoy it. <3

Wishing you Good luck from Anna S, Stockholm, Sweden.

AnnaGsann (talk) 08:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Declined CSDs

Hi Graeme,

Hope you're well. I'm just leaving a message to query two of the three G11 declines you made.

For reference, in order of CSD application, I'm talking about:

1. Special:Diff/980502903
2. Special:Diff/980326414
3. Special:Diff/980506327

The second and third declines are the ones I want to ask about.

On the second one, you said in the linked edit summary this has been around for 13 years, so no speedy delete, use prod or afd. As I've been off-wiki for a while, I re-checked Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and it doesn't seem that longevity of an article exempts it from speedy deletion.

On the third one, you said in the linked edit summary Spam delete declined, there are lots of earlier versions to revert to if required. It is correct that speedy deletion is only applicable if all revisions fulfil a speedy deletion criterion, however I am struggling to find a revision of the article in question which is not blatantly promotional.

I fully accept that CSD is meant for unambiguous cases and that, especially when it comes to what constitutes salvageable material, a lot of ambiguity can arise, however in order to improve my tagging in future I thought it would be useful to get your perspective in more detail on these declines. I've followed your advice of using a PROD on the second one and applied it to all three because in each case, after having examined the sources in more depth and their previous revisions, I've concluded that aside from the evident promotional problems the articles exhibit, none of them appear to meet the relevant notability guidelines.

Many thanks,

SITH (talk) 13:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

@StraussInTheHouse: For me to delete for a G11 reason, the tone of the article must be promotional throughout. Otherwise if there is only a small amount of promotion, it could be removed easily by editing. This may result in a different opinion as to whether promotion is "blatant". For articles that have been around a long time, if many different people have edited it in the past and failed to notice the promotion, then it is probably not so promotional as to be speedy deleted. Sometimes if I think that the topic of the page looks good I will decline a G11 and remove some promotional text. We also have the problem that many that put in an article, do so for promotion. But if they are skilled in writing, they can avoid promotional tone and pufferry and yet have a biased article. For example there can be articles that talk about a company's leadership, philanthropy, awards and products that are obviously intended to promote the company, but are not G11 material, as all they need is balance, and removal of overemphasis on unencyclopedic content. In the last week I have deleted quite a few pages for G11 reasons. One issue that casued a dispute, that you can read above, is where a page with very little content, eg a just a name, personal weblink or phone number, appears. Is that a spam if it is a sandbox or draft? If on a userpage it would be acceptable. As a draft I have deleted some of these as test-pages, as the writer did not really intend to make an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:44, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett, fair enough, thank you for taking the time to explain SITH (talk) 11:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Possible disruptive edition in Proxima Centauri c

Hello. I was wondering whether you could please check this wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Proxima_Centauri_c I edited it saying the exoplanet is still a candidate, but one user (SevenSpheresCelestia) keeps saying the exoplanet was confirmed. As you can see, he only provides 1 source (which is just a research note), and for an exoplanet to be confirmed, it has to be officially confirmed but at least 2 different peer-reviewed papers. I don't want to reverse his edit, because we haven't reached consensus in the Talk page. I think the page he did under a different name (ConnallES) should be kept, but I would say that it's better to call Proxima c a candidate or unconfirmed exoplanet because only 1 author says it's confirmed and all the other recent papers (from this year) still call it a candidate not confirmed.

(This bit seems to be written by Albertheditor (talk · contribs) )

Hi, please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Baseless accusations of sockpuppetry from User:Albertheditor. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 03:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Querying Your CSD Decline

Following this you declined because it wasn’t blatantly promotional, fair enough, but addendum you included was that the article was “unsubmitted” Now, if or not an article is submitted or unsubmitted, a G11 would still apply regardless if it is blatantly promotional. I just thought to let you know this as the G, in G11 means General & applies across all spectrums. Thank you for your time. Celestina007 (talk) 18:27, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, I was describing the AFC state of the article. If it was submitted then it could get a reject as promotional. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Rod O'Loan, Sydney University 1934.jpg

Hi Graeme Bartlett. Just letting you know I've deleted this file and others you've declined. Normally I would agree with you, but the uploader is currently the subject of a CCI and has admitted they are unsure about the copyright statuses of their uploads. Unless you have evidence proving these files are free, I think they should be deleted. -FASTILY 00:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

You can tell from the dates what the copyright status is. Pre-1946 photos from Australia are public domain in US and Australia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:Chlorimides has been nominated for deletion

Category:Chlorimides has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:44, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Need help reviewing Draft:Fordeal

I need you to review Draft:Fordeal, I have made great improvements. Please help me.36.103.228.81 (talk) 07:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

I have commented. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Inverse chirp Z-transform

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inverse chirp Z-transform".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Webull

I have improved Draft:Webull. Please help me review it. 150.223.17.4 (talk) 15:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

There is already plenty of reviewing and comments already there. You need to find substantial writings on the topic. Not single-liners. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett:Thank you for your valuable suggestion, I think I have founded some substantial writings on this topic and improved it. Please help me review Draft:Webull again. Thank you again! 150.223.17.4 (talk) 07:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Inverse chirp Z-transform

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inverse chirp Z-transform".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Awesome job creating the Carbonaceous sulfur hydride article the day it was announced. I expanded the article some and nominated it for WP:DYK as I think it would make a great main page fact, it was a landmark discovery. If you would like to modify the nomination in any way, you can do so here Template:Did you know nominations/Carbonaceous sulfur hydride. Feel free to add alternatives or reword anything you want. Footlessmouse (talk) 04:59, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Carbonaceous sulfur hydride

Hello! Your submission of Carbonaceous sulfur hydride at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 06:19, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Merge Template:Fluorides and Template:Fluorine compounds?

Good day Graeme Bartlett, those two templates deliver similar information. Would you think about merging them? -- Ktsquare (talk) 18:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fluorides

Template:Fluorides has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Thomas and friends locations

If you have the copy of the deleted page about the fictional locations in Thomas and friends, can you restore it? Thanks!2604:6000:130F:4FB6:B0FC:C220:C626:2953 (talk) 04:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

See here, it is no deleted: User:Djm-leighpark/List of fictional locations in Thomas & Friends. We are not associated with the TTTE wiki so cannot put up the page there. Perhaps you can register an account, or ask somebody there to assist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Carbonaceous sulfur hydride

Hello! Your submission of Carbonaceous sulfur hydride at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Otolin

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Otolin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Nicole Couch § Infobox image

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Nicole Couch § Infobox image. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Template:Z48

Hi Graeme. I know you've already tried to sort this out per User talk:Philip H Taylor#Unspecified source/license for File:Nicole Couch.jpeg and I'm not trying to step on your toes or anything like that, but I think the best thing here would be OTRS verification. The actual source given for the file is Facebook, not the label's website, and even though the images are practically the same one is in color and one isn't. The provenance of the file isn't very clear at all and even being generous in assuming good faith still leaves a lot of unknowns that I think would lead to problems on Commmons (which is where a CC-0 licensed file should really be) per c:COM:PCP. If, however, you think my concerns are unwarranted, then I'll respect that and self-revert the npd tag per talk page discussion. However, I think in that case it would be better to change the source of the image and even perhaps replace the BW one with the color one. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Carbonaceous sulfur hydride

On 2 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Carbonaceous sulfur hydride, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the synthetic compound carbonaceous sulfur hydride is the world's first room-temperature superconductor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Carbonaceous sulfur hydride. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Carbonaceous sulfur hydride), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Reviewing pages

		The Wikipedia Motivation Barnstar
		Thanks on quick reviews. Akrasia25 (talk) 21:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Insup Lee - Retry

Hello, Graeme!

I'm a new contributor to Wikipedia, and still learning the ropes. I drafted an article (Draft:Insup Lee) that utilized some material I had previously written on other websites. I understand now that, even though the material was my own, this type of reuse is not permitted on Wikipedia. I'd like to give it another shot with this information in mind, with more citations and zero instances of plagiarism.

The Draft page says if I want to recreate a page similar to the one that was originally deleted, I should first contact the user that deleted it - that's why I'm reaching out to you. :)

My apologies for the confusion, I'm still learning. Could I try writing this article again?

Precise315 (talk) 03:37, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

@Precise315: There are a few ways to go on this. The first is to look at WP:Autobiography (which may or may not apply). Secondly I note that copyright is claimed by University of Pennsylvania, so even if you wrote it, perhaps you did it on their behalf, giving over rights to that content to them. A third way to go, if you want to claim to be a particular person in the real world, is the use the WP:OTRS team to send them an email to prove that your Wikipedia logon is who you claim to be. Then content written by the claimed person can be believed to be from them. Given the progress made on the draft, it probably is best to just write it again without copying from any other previous publication. Part of the reason for this, is that this is an encyclopedia with a different purpose to a university biography. I note that https://cps-vo.org/node/33312 has a creative commons 2.5 license. However it is unclear what that is, as there are several different creative commons licenses. Compatible ones are CC-BY, CC-BY-SA-3.0, CC-0. Licenses with -ND or -NC do not permit use on Wikipedia. So if that is your web site, you may relicense under one of the compatible licenses. There is also a standard way to display the license, with a link to the text, a logo and standard abbreviations. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett: Thanks for all the advice, I appreciate it. I agree that it would be best to write it again without copying any content, that's definitely my plan for the rewrite. I'll give it another go! Precise315 (talk) 02:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Russell Islands

Hey- I am thinking about adding this map [4] to the Geography section on the Russell Islands page you created [5]. Please let me know what you think. Geographyinitiative (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

@Geographyinitiative: The map does look a bit better, but because it is non-free, it is replaceable, and so we should not use it. If you find a commonwealth of Australia map from 1969 or before it will be public domain now. Also much material on ga.gov.au is under a CC-BY license, but with a quick look I couldn't find a map of Russell islands. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Another compatible map is on openstreetmap: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/-9.0726/159.1322 You could add the names found on the map you uploaded, to openstreetmap, and then take a copy of that to use on Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:29, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Undeletion of Draft:Mint Mobile

WP:REFUND/G13 gave me a "This page already exists!" notice when I tried to use it to request undeletion, and since I know you have been active in REFUND lately, I figured I would ask here manually for it to be undone. Here's the reason I had entered at the REFUND wizard: I made a small change to the draft a few minutes before it was deleted under CSD criterion G13, as I intended to work on the draft at a later date and I was attempting to "save" it from G13 deletion. I am not the draft's original author, but I believe the article meets GNG. Liz did not see the edit and deleted the page under criterion G13. I would like it restored so I can work on it. Thank you. --Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 06:00, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Squeeps10: it's back for you to improve. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you kindly. --Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 06:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

I didn't "ignore" your edit, Squeeps10, I had opened the page in a tab an hour before it was eligible for a G13 deletion and checked the edit history. You edited the page during that hour and I failed to refresh the page before deleting it. Assume good faith. I have made many tens of thousands of page deletions and this has never happened before. I will make sure it doesn't happen again. According to WP:SYSOP, Occasional mistakes are entirely compatible with adminship; administrators are not expected to be perfect. Like all administrators, I am not perfect. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

P.S. I hope you know, Squeebs10, that you can always go to the admin who deleted a page to ask questions about it. I could have restored that page for you if you had asked. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Okay, perhaps "ignored" was a poor choice of words. I have changed it to "did not see". As for your second point, I was aware of that fact, but WP:REFUND/G13 wasn't working for some reason and I saw Graeme had been active in undeletion requests lately, so I asked him to do it since I knew it was something he was comfortable doing. Should something similar happen again, I'll be sure to ask the deleting administrator. --SqueePs10 ^Talk_{My edits} 02:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

I am pretty sure if you asked on WP:REFUND it would have come back too, as well as asking deleting admin. Any you may well get a more speedy response there, as individual admins are not working 24 hours a day. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

eInvest

Hi @Graeme Bartlett: I see this has been recreated, along with no references and lots external links in the body. Is that not supposed to go Draft after it has been created. scope_creep^Talk 09:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Since it was soft-deleted, it was restored on request. This is not what I would call recreated, more like restored. You are welcome to improve the article. To me it sounds promotional in tone. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Untitled fifth Predator film

I am wondering, is there a blank edit of mine underneath this page? can it be restored? Starzoner (talk) 13:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

@Starzoner: this is one of the confusing cases. there were two revisions you wrote: The first was totally blank with an edit summary of "New Page for township in China", and the second revision says: "The Last of Us is an upcoming tv show." These orphaned revision might have come from User:Starzoner/2015. But since they are nothing to do with this topic, I will leave them deleted. What is there now is a merging of revision you wrote, and what Rusted AutoParts wrote an hour before. So pick the best of the writings. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Ah ok. I had repurposed them because of that, and didn't realize those happened. Thank you so much though. Starzoner (talk) 02:25, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Review: My new page

Just created a new page: Piperolactam_A, please reveiw it. Thanks in advance

•  Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Yugoslavia 1968

Hey there, this edit that you made on a duplicative draft article for Yugoslavia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1968 reset the 6 month wait period for its automatic deletion on its last day. A while back I asked for it to be deleted administratively because the original author ended up making a real article as well, meaning the draft has no use. Any chance you could help me delete it? I'd rather not wait another 6 months. Grk1011 (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

@Grk1011: It won't be deleted on your request as user:Taurussweden asked for this to be restored after it was already deleted. But Taurussweden could ask for deletion, or it could be redirected to the article space. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

The draft was created on May 11, but the next day May 12 Taurussweden realized the redirect could just be removed in the article space and appears to have never returned to the Draft except because it was going to be deleted. Confused maybe? @Taurussweden: do you intend to work on the Draft article or the real one? Grk1011 (talk) 16:03, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett: If @Grk1011: statement above is correct, then, please delete my article. comment by Taurussweden

• I will delete the draft in that case. I see you do not need it @Taurussweden: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Geotechnical applications of Lidar

Hello! Your submission of Geotechnical applications of Lidar at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, are you returning to this nomination to fix the issues? Yoninah (talk) 00:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Help

Hello Graeme Bartlett

I'm currently in the process of writing an ANI, but it is my first one and I'm unsure if people believe I have a case. Could you have a look at it?

It has been 2 years since the last ANI against Beyond My Ken, and nothing have changed. BMK continues to break WP:NPOV by making images of "bad people" smaller, arguing glorification, as he continues to believe that default image sizing equals support.[6][7][8][9][10][11] As such, any attempt to get him to stop this has resulted in Bullying[12] and personal attacks.[13][14][15][16][17]

Thanks in advance for the help. Skjoldbro (talk) 10:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

@Skjoldbro: I am no use to help you here, as I have never started a complaint on the drama board. All I know is to read the instructions at the top. Add a new section. Notify the perpetrator on their talk page. Beware of the WP:boomerang. Perhaps the place to talk about it in general is Wikipedia talk:Image use policy. As that policy should cover this situation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I'm going to try at ANI anyways as I believe the user to break civility and core content policies. Skjoldbro (talk) 11:07, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Streetsound

Hi you weighed in on the copyright issue with my article Streetsound - that was several weeks back. I was wondering how long might a copyright review by the admins take, and if you had any other suggestions that i might pursue? thanks in advance.. Chris Torella Ctorella 15:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Really I do not know every one is a volunteer, and I suppose many do not do anything on the weekend. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC).. thanks I'll keep watch! Chris Torella Ctorella 13:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft to Article - Olivier Mourão

Darling, thank you so much for bringing as draft. Can you help me to set this draft as an article up ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felipe Fanzeres (talk • contribs) 23:27, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

That is not a way to address me (unless you know me outside Wikipedia). Anyway you should talk to user:Samudra Malla about this, as he moved it backwards and forwards, and wrote most content, but also blanked it. One way to get a review is to add the {{subst:submit}} template to it. But perhaps you should investigate third party references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	PERFECTLY SPLENDID, Thank you so much. Felipe Fanzeres (talk) 23:30, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Hello. I've seen you have improved several articles I've created, so I wanted to thank you for your work. Regards. ExoEditor 17:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Little Ice Age volcanism

Hello! Your submission of Little Ice Age volcanism at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Earth system interactions across mountain belts

Hello! Your submission of Earth system interactions across mountain belts at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, it's been nearly 2 weeks since this was reviewed. The page creator has not edited for nearly a month. Are you going to pursue it, or should it be closed as unsuccessful? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett, final notice for this nomination. It is so severely undercited that I don't see much point in holding it open given how long the article has sat without editing since its original review. If nothing has been done in the next couple of days, I expect to mark it for closure this weekend. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Picture addition?

Hey bro, could you add the picture of chemical synthesis in synthesis part of the article from this URL: in Tropine and/or Tropacocaine. I am not sure if chemical synthesis falls under copyright? Leave message at my talk page if it causes any copyright issues.

Machinexa (talk) 11:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Since the URL is being rendered in bad way at your talk page, use the URL from the following page Tropine Tropacocaine reference.

Machinexa (talk) 11:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

The image would be at https://www.seanmichaelragan.com/img/cocaine_analog_in_two_steps_from_native_plant_material.png But I think that would be a copyright problem. Something that is just a molecular structure is not subject to copyright. But the synthesis has too many creative choices in it. @Machinexa: I lost chemdraw a few years ago when my machine upgraded, so my chemical diagram capability is very pathetic now. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:15, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Got it Machinexa (talk) 12:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Draft:Olivier Mourão

I have noticed the artist niche of Wikipedia is very rich though I had the wish to contribute in that segment. Olivier Mourão seemed a good candidate to me for inclusion initially so I decided to write an article on him. I have been relying primarily on his website for the information. I gradually came to know about importance of secondary sources and WP:PRIMARY and WP:SECONDARY. I thought with my future researches I will surely get some more information about the artist specially when he had experiences over so many decades (what his website says) but unfortunately I did not find much when I looked up for the same after writing the article. I have reached numerous galleries, museums, achieves and libraries for any probable secondary sources about him but till now I haven't got much. So I think the information about the person lack enough secondary sources and the person is not notable enough for Wikipedia so I have applied previously under CSD G7 as per wikipedia guideline. I have seen some comments recently like these diff1, diff2, diff3 . I have no clue what these comments mean and how the commenters are related with the article. I am again requesting for CSD G7 for the reason already mentioned being the author of the article. I am trying to gather more information on the person and I wish to write the article in a way that meets Wikipedia guidelines adequately (if possible) in future. Samudra Malla (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

I assume that this means that User:Felipe Fanzeres wants this to become an article and has contested your delete request. If he can come up with more sources, that is fine, but if he does nothing then the page will become deleted in 6 months anyway. It is not a harmful page, so I would suggest you give other editors that are interested a chance. Of course writing in the article has to be in English, but sources do not. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft to Article - Olivier Mourão

Hello Graeme, I see what you mean. Well, he's an international artist, so i love his art and trying to set his wikipedia article on, so i found a lot of materials in various places, such a beautiful art.I would like your mentoring to add more materials, because I have at least 15 new sources/links to add on his wiki article. Can you mentor me ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felipe Fanzeres (talk • contribs) 11:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

First step is to sign your talk with ~~~~ since I cannot easily tell who you are. Using the square brackets [[Draft:Olivier Mourão]] to get Draft:Olivier Mourão, you can get a link to the page (I hope that is right) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

@Felipe Fanzeres: I have restored the Draft:Olivier Mourão again. So please get in quick and add your sources - perhaps at the end if you have no text to add yet.

Graeme, i'm sorry for bothering you again, my edition wasn't clear enough to bring the article Online again. Can you help me to edit correctly ? I really want to do the right thing, but i need some help. Felipe Fanzeres (talk) 19:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Felipe Fanzeres

I suggest that you start writing from scratch. Before you only removed text and added tags. But to be a significant author you would have to write some text. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:35, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi Graeme, thank you so much for everything. Well, i see now the point, i'm working with a friend to improve the article again, give me a chance to fix all the issues i've got with this draft. I really want to collaborate with WP and help a lot of people. But before, help me with this Olivier Mourao. Felipe Fanzeres (talk) 00:05, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Felipe Fanzeres

@Felipe Fanzeres: you still have not recreated Draft:Olivier Mourão. Your first step should be to create the page and add some content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

I thought the best option would be to use this Draft that was deleted rather than create a new article. So the best thing to do is to create a new article? Felipe Fanzeres (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Felipe Fanzeres

The reason is that the creator of that draft does not want it there, so it keeps being deleted. But if you create your own writing then that option will not be available to another. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Article John Hewson

This was the main article which has been continually updated by User ‎Celco85 who you banned for 24 hours a couple of days ago for disruptive editing, over the past month or so. In conjunction with User:MarnetteD we had only just cleaned up this article including the covering of a large number of bare URLs within the last hour, after I had reverted another one of Celco85's edits where he had included two unacceptable comments as well as having a new reference which did not work - coded incorrectly. I think the information which is being included is frivolous and unnecessary and are more reason for the two hat notes which another editor has placed on this article in November. Where do we go from here?Fleet Lists (talk) 05:00, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Geology of Himachal Pradesh

Hello! Your submission of Geology of Himachal Pradesh at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 11:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Little Ice Age volcanism

Hello! Your submission of Little Ice Age volcanism at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 14:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Fault zone hydrogeology

Hello! Your submission of Fault zone hydrogeology at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 17:55, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Question

Hi,

I wanted to ask about a page though. I recently created Draft:Reservation Dogs, and had noticed in the logs that it was deleted. Is there anything worth retrieving in the deleted edits? Starzoner (talk) 14:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

@Starzoner: there is nothing useful there, only 4 words in total, no infobox, no refs, no punctuation. Your draft is a much better starting point. Merry Christmas to you! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

hi Graeme, I'm bacak. Can I ask about Draft:Halloween Ends? Its deleted twice but are there anything worth retrieving/keeping? Starzoner (talk) 15:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Graeme Bartlett, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Starzoner (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

I wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays! Starzoner (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Hideaway 1998.jpg

Hey there. You rejected my request for undeletion because the previous revision has more textures way beyond PD-simple. How about another release using the same artwork? I see smooth gloss and less texture. Is it free in the US? --George Ho (talk) 22:47, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Well this picture has less texture, so perhaps the texture in the earlier uploaded image is artifact. (photographic sensor noise perhaps) However the discogs image has photographed wear and tear on the cover, and copyright would apply to that image. The red text is clearer than the one that was uploaded, but still there are .jpg artifacts. @George Ho: Merry Christmas to you! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:53, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

BitcoinZ

site got deleted becouse of this link if iunderstand correctly: source URL: forum.btcz.rocks/t/an-updated-bitcoinz-description/1325) That is list of links which are usable if you wanna connect with BitcoinZ community over social media, or if you wanna see description on youtube. and since i don't see my page anymore i cannot delete link to forum... i eavn dont remmeber puting one on site. can you please help with a little bit more details? and can i have a look in that deleted paragraph... i took me whole day to edit it and it was deleted in 5s without any conversation. regards rok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rokmik (talk • contribs) 13:08, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

• Well the text as written by someone with a different username, Nick Hill said: "BitcoinZ is an Bitcoin-like cryptocurrency incorporating ZK-Snark based private transactions. The code is based on a fork of Zcash. The blockchain is not a fork, and began with a new genesis block on 9th September 2017.". Here was a see also section, that is not required in an article like this. Basically we consider anything here to do with digital currencies an advertisement. But to argue about the deletion you must first consult with user talk:Jimfbleak rather than me. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Help

Hello @Graeme Bartlett:, Belated Merry Christmas, and Happy New Year in advance, hope you get all the happiness you deserve. Can you please help me by marking the article Hero – Gayab Mode On as patrol/reviewed. Thanks for your consideration. --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 12:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Royville

I saw you restored this on request from its editor. I've blocked that editor as a UPE. Since this draft is pretty rubbish, I've re-deleted as it obviously won't be going anywhere. Hope that's OK, if not, feel free to restore Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:07, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Graeme Bartlett: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. Starzoner (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

I wish you a prosperous 2021! Starzoner (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft to Article - Olivier Mourão

Graeme, wish you a very happy year. All the blessings for you. Well, I'm here asking you for a last try. I'm studying a lot everything you told me and now i found out what you've been teaching. Help me to restore the Draft so i can do the edition on edition's page and not in the wrong place. Thank you so much and happy new year. Felipe Fanzeres (talk) 20:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Felipe Fanzeres

A kitten for you!

Happy new year

Felipe Fanzeres (talk) 20:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Fault zone hydrogeology

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Geological structure measurement by LiDAR

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Earth system interactions across mountain belts.
Message added 02:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett, this is a courtesy notification that the three remaining geology nominations from November 15 have been marked for closure as abandoned since you have failed to respond to the issues raised despite multiple pings. If you should respond prior to their closure, consistent attention will be expected going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Matej Bel logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Matej Bel logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Frank Kortan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Kortan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Kortan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Theredproject (talk) 12:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

"Next Liberal Party of Canada leadership election" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Next Liberal Party of Canada leadership election. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Next Liberal Party of Canada leadership election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

RevDel

Hi, I saw your name on the list of admins willing to handle RevDel. There's a draft Draft:Victor Spinski I was asked to review and I think it might be ready for the mainspace. However, I've tagged it for RevDel because of a copyvio issue in its history and I'd like this to be fixed before moving. Would you mind having a look at that page? Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 09:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

@Modussiccandi: I have done a revdel, if it is the appropriate revisions, please proceed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Yes, those were the appropriate ones. Have a great day and best, Modussiccandi (talk) 10:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

PP template cleanup

Hi! Your cleanup edit in the Budapest article put {{short description}} between {{pp-move-indef}} and {{pp-pc}}. I think the two protection templates should remain together, any other template should be either before or after them. Could you please reconsider your cleanup regexp (or whatever you do the cleanup with)? Thanks in advance, —Tacsipacsi (talk) 14:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

I have moved the short description. My main purpose in the edit was to correct "slightly". Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:43, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Syrp

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Syrp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jenyire2 (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Starzoner

Hi Graeme Bartlett, I have noticed draft that deleted revisions of Draft:The Greatest Beer Run Ever (film) have been restored, which is not bad of you, what if it is bad is to create a draft, abandon it and then when a user recreates it again, request its restoration, that's exactly what the user Starzoner do. It seems to me totally unnecessary to request restoration of editions that do not even add something new to the existing content. I want to take advantage and let you know about this that happened a couple of days ago and as the user in question is only interested in appearing as the creator of the articles in question. A few days ago I also requested the restoration of deleted editions of Draft:Spencer (film) which was rejected for just reasons. Regards. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 00:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

I attach this link that confirms my opinion that Starzoner is only interested in "being the first" to create the articles. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 01:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

you may want to see the deletion log. It was done so to remove the hoax edits, something that normally reverted and removed on Wikipedia. Starzoner (talk) 12:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Comment: I did that deletion of hoax. Anyway when restoring stuff I do have to consider whether to bring back other speedy deleted versions that may exist. Also useless history merges should not be performed as selective merges are very labor intensive. So if the current version did not use a draft of the same topic, there is no point in merging. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Katrina Spade, are you serious?

Would this be an encyclopedic character? Wikipedia is not a collection of creatives who propose non-profit projects. The recompose facebook page has 3000 likes, the articles have a ridiculous diffusion, more from gossip than from a project to be seriously considered. Beyond the opinion that one can have about the thing, it is not of an encyclopedic character in itself, as is not the creator. Let's be serious please. Harukanaru (talk) 22:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

You should therefore start an AFD for Katrina Spade. I accept AFC if it has more than 50% chance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Help

Hi! I have no idea how to ask for the DRV of Superkombat Fighting Championship (and also 2018 in SUPERKOMBAT, 2017 in SUPERKOMBAT, 2016 in SUPERKOMBAT, 2015 in SUPERKOMBAT, 2014 in SUPERKOMBAT, 2013 in SUPERKOMBAT, 2012 in SUPERKOMBAT and 2011 in SUPERKOMBAT)

Here are my reasons:

I request the undeletion of Superkombat Fighting Championship (plus all its pages - the years), because a mistake was made back in time. First of all this article had been deleted several times in the past because in the beginning the kickboxing promotion was unknown. And also there was a war on Wikipedia from the MMA "users" against kickboxing, until new regulations.

My reasons are:

1. These are precious info for the history of the sport, SUPERKOMBAT of top promoter Eduard Irimia is considered the 2nd best promotion of Europe all-time after the Netherlands-based It's Showtime. Before it was called Local Kombat (2003-2013). SUPERKOMBAT had headquarters in Bucharest, Romania, but also in London, Las Vegas and New York City.

2. SUPERKOMBAT was named Promotion of the Year in 2011 in front of GLORY (Ultimate Glory), that now is according to the Kickboxing task force "the kickboxing's UFC - World No 1. promotion in the world". Additionally, SUPERKOMBAT was nominated in the top 4 kickboxing promotions of the world.

3. GLORY champions Rico Verhoeven, Alex Pereira and Pavel Zhuravlev competed in SUPERKOMBAT. GLORY title challengers Benjamin Adegbuyi, Daniel Ghiță, Errol Zimmerman, Mladen Brestovac, Anderson Silva, Yousri Belgaroui and Yoann Kongolo competed in SUPERKOMBAT. GLORY tournament winners Ismael Londt and D'Angelo Marshall competed in SUPERKOMBAT. Other top 10 kickboxers in their divisions competed in SUPERKOMBAT: Roman Kryklia (currently #2 heavyweight), Zabit Samedov (current #6 heavyweight), Murat Aygün (current #8 heavyweight), Tarik Khbabez (current #9 heavyweight), Felipe Micheletti (current #8 light heavyweight), Zinedine Hameur-Lain (current #10 light heavyweight), Igor Bugaenko (current #6 middleweight), Jamie Bates (current #5 welterweight) and many more from the past rankings. Several of these are SUPERKOMBAT products, it is proved that no other promotion has been feeding GLORY like SUPERKOMBAT.

4. SUPERKOMBAT is not on Wikipedia, but even regional kickboxing promotions are allowed, such as King in the Ring, W5, Global Fighting Championship and more. Just saying, make justice for SUPERKOMBAT.

5. SUPERKOMBAT had received coverage from the largest European newspapers such as MARCA, Gazeta Sporturilor etc. It had a contract with the most known sports European channel Eurosport and also with CBS Sports in the United States of America. SUPERKOMBAT's official YouTube channel has fights with over 1 million views.

6. SUPERKOMBAT was still deleted, although 5 people said to Keep it and 3 to Delete it (4 with the nominator). The nominator Jayjg STRANGELY retired later from Wikipedia.

—.karellian-24 (talk) 17:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Because there was a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superkombat Fighting Championship, there should be a discussion to reverse that decision. It is not that strange to retire. People have lives outside Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

What you do is add this wikitext to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2021_February_7&action=edit&preload=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/New_day

{{subst:drv2 |page=Superkombat Fighting Championship |xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superkombat Fighting Championship |reason=SUPERKOMBAT had received coverage from the largest European newspapers such as MARCA, Gazeta Sporturilor etc. It had a contract with the most known sports European channel [[Eurosport]] and also with [[CBS Sports]] in the United States of America. }} ~~~~

I have picked your strongest argument as the reason, It would be best to find the links to prove the coverage, as it would prove WP:GNG if true. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! I really appreciate, buddy! —.karellian-24 (talk) 22:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Superkombat

Hi again! The articles must be renamed into:

Superkombat Fighting Championship to Superkombat (I will mention in the article the full name),

and

• 2018 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2018 in Superkombat
• 2017 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2017 in Superkombat
• 2016 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2016 in Superkombat
• 2015 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2015 in Superkombat
• 2014 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2014 in Superkombat
• 2013 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2013 in Superkombat
• 2012 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2012 in Superkombat
• 2011 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2011 in Superkombat

The other admin said so, per WP:MOSCAPS and WP:MOSTM.

Regards,

—.karellian-24 (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

If they do get restored or recreated they can be renamed. A deleted page cannot be renamed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, thank lot, I will try to rename it after if it wil be recovered! I already know that, I just thought you can move the material but I will do it myself if gets recovered. —.karellian-24 (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

hi

Can you copy paste original text to Poochy (Nintendo) here? there might be some info for Characters in the Mario franchise#Poochy. thanks 2005-Fan (talk) 19:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

redacted text mucking page format

@2005-Fan: here is the maximum version. most of its life was a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! 2005-Fan (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Okay, I added something here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Characters_in_the_Mario_franchise&type=revision&diff=1006635777&oldid=1006261970. 2005-Fan (talk) 23:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Bigg Boss Malayalam poster.jpg

Hi Graeme. Since you've edited this file's page before here, maybe you can figure out what's going on. If Wikipedia has an equivalent to c:COM:OVERWRITE or c:COM:SPLIT, then this would likely qualify. It looks like the uploader is trying to update File:Bigg Boss Malayalam 2 poster.jpg, but instead uploaded it as an updated version of this. The problem (if it's a problem) is the the older version appears to have been intended solely for List of Bigg Boss (Malayalam TV series) episodes, whereas the newer version seems to have been intended for Bigg Boss (Malayalam TV series). The file is going to be tagged for removal from the main series article by JJMC89 Bot per WP:NFCC#10c if a rationale isn't provided for that particular use. I don't know anything about the show and have no idea if the new logo is correct since the non-free use rationale wasn't updated when the file was updated. Any suggestions on what to do here? -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look at this Graeme. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

OK I have split the images to two files File:Bigg Boss Malayalam poster.jpg, and File:Bigg Boss Malayalam poster 3.jpg. Marchjuly can you use them appropriately and fix FURS as needed? We also need a source! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm not the uploader; so, I don't know where the file came from. I'll post a note on the uploader's page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I posted a message about this on the uploader's user talk page; so, perhaps they will clarify the source of the file. Now, I'm wondering if you'd mind taking a look at File:Manfred Lindner.jpg, which is similar case of file overwriting. This file is being discussed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 February 15#File:Manfred Lindner.jpg and both versions might actually be subject to WP:F9; so, perhaps there's no point to spliting the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, best to await discussion about whether any will be kept. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Phenoxyacetic acid

Hi Graeme

There is a draft article Draft:Phenoxyacetic Acid that has been awaiting review since it was created by a new editor last December. I have commented on their talk page User talk:Danidq1 that it has a large number of errors and would be better if its useful portions (e.g. the Chembox) were merged to Phenoxy herbicide. However, after a week the user has not responded to my comments. It would be helpful if you could formally decline the draft and suggest next steps. Thanks. Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)