iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotient_stack
Quotient stack - Wikipedia

In algebraic geometry, a quotient stack is a stack that parametrizes equivariant objects. Geometrically, it generalizes a quotient of a scheme or a variety by a group: a quotient variety, say, would be a coarse approximation of a quotient stack.

The notion is of fundamental importance in the study of stacks: a stack that arises in nature is often either a quotient stack itself or admits a stratification by quotient stacks (e.g., a Deligne–Mumford stack.) A quotient stack is also used to construct other stacks like classifying stacks.

Definition

edit

A quotient stack is defined as follows. Let G be an affine smooth group scheme over a scheme S and X an S-scheme on which G acts. Let the quotient stack   be the category over the category of S-schemes, where

  • an object over T is a principal G-bundle   together with equivariant map  ;
  • a morphism from   to   is a bundle map (i.e., forms a commutative diagram) that is compatible with the equivariant maps   and  .

Suppose the quotient   exists as an algebraic space (for example, by the Keel–Mori theorem). The canonical map

 ,

that sends a bundle P over T to a corresponding T-point,[1] need not be an isomorphism of stacks; that is, the space "X/G" is usually coarser. The canonical map is an isomorphism if and only if the stabilizers are trivial (in which case   exists.)[citation needed]

In general,   is an Artin stack (also called algebraic stack). If the stabilizers of the geometric points are finite and reduced, then it is a Deligne–Mumford stack.

Burt Totaro (2004) has shown: let X be a normal Noetherian algebraic stack whose stabilizer groups at closed points are affine. Then X is a quotient stack if and only if it has the resolution property; i.e., every coherent sheaf is a quotient of a vector bundle. Earlier, Robert Wayne Thomason proved that a quotient stack has the resolution property.

Examples

edit

An effective quotient orbifold, e.g.,   where the   action has only finite stabilizers on the smooth space  , is an example of a quotient stack.[2]

If   with trivial action of   (often   is a point), then   is called the classifying stack of   (in analogy with the classifying space of  ) and is usually denoted by  . Borel's theorem describes the cohomology ring of the classifying stack.

Moduli of line bundles

edit

One of the basic examples of quotient stacks comes from the moduli stack   of line bundles   over  , or   over   for the trivial  -action on  . For any scheme (or  -scheme)  , the  -points of the moduli stack are the groupoid of principal  -bundles  .

Moduli of line bundles with n-sections

edit

There is another closely related moduli stack given by   which is the moduli stack of line bundles with  -sections. This follows directly from the definition of quotient stacks evaluated on points. For a scheme  , the  -points are the groupoid whose objects are given by the set

 

The morphism in the top row corresponds to the  -sections of the associated line bundle over  . This can be found by noting giving a  -equivariant map   and restricting it to the fiber   gives the same data as a section   of the bundle. This can be checked by looking at a chart and sending a point   to the map  , noting the set of  -equivariant maps   is isomorphic to  . This construction then globalizes by gluing affine charts together, giving a global section of the bundle. Since  -equivariant maps to   is equivalently an  -tuple of  -equivariant maps to  , the result holds.

Moduli of formal group laws

edit

Example:[3] Let L be the Lazard ring; i.e.,  . Then the quotient stack   by  ,

 ,

is called the moduli stack of formal group laws, denoted by  .

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ The T-point is obtained by completing the diagram  .
  2. ^ "Definition 1.7". Orbifolds and Stringy Topology. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. p. 4.
  3. ^ Taken from http://www.math.harvard.edu/~lurie/252xnotes/Lecture11.pdf

Some other references are