dbo:abstract
|
- Verrall v Great Yarmouth BC [1981] QB 202 is a land and contract law case on the arbitrary revocation of an agreed, future licence in land for good consideration. It also determined whether the remedy of specific performance was available to the claimant, who succeeded in the action and as respondent against the Council's appeal or whether damages would be a more appropriate remedy. It decided that ordering specific performance was appropriate. (en)
|
dbo:thumbnail
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 3402 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:caption
| |
dbp:citations
|
- [1980] 1 All ER 839 (en)
- [1980] 3 WLR 258 (en)
- [1981] QB 202 (en)
|
dbp:court
| |
dbp:dateDecided
|
- 0001-10-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:fullName
|
- Richard Verrall v Great Yarmouth Borough Council (en)
|
dbp:judges
|
- Roskill LJ (en)
- Cumming-Bruce LJ (en)
- Lord Denning M.R. (en)
- Watkins J (en)
|
dbp:keywords
|
- Licence relating to property, future event licence for consideration, revocation in breach, unjustified breach, party politics, specific performance (en)
|
dbp:name
|
- Verrall v Great Yarmouth BC (en)
|
dbp:priorActions
|
- Appellant also lost at High Court. (en)
|
dbp:subsequentActions
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Verrall v Great Yarmouth BC [1981] QB 202 is a land and contract law case on the arbitrary revocation of an agreed, future licence in land for good consideration. It also determined whether the remedy of specific performance was available to the claimant, who succeeded in the action and as respondent against the Council's appeal or whether damages would be a more appropriate remedy. It decided that ordering specific performance was appropriate. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Verrall v Great Yarmouth BC (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:depiction
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |