iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://dbpedia.org/resource/Poole_v._Fleeger
About: Poole v. Fleeger
An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Poole v. Fleeger, 36 U.S. (11 Pet.) 185 (1837), is a 7-to-0 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the states of Kentucky and Tennessee had properly entered into an agreement establishing a mutual border between the two states. The plaintiffs in the case were granted title to property improperly conveyed by the state of Tennessee north of this border. In the ruling, the Supreme Court asserted the fundamental right of states and nations to establish their borders regardless of private contract, and made a fundamental statement about the rights of parties to object to a trial court ruling under the rules of civil procedure.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Poole v. Fleeger, 36 U.S. (11 Pet.) 185 (1837), is a 7-to-0 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the states of Kentucky and Tennessee had properly entered into an agreement establishing a mutual border between the two states. The plaintiffs in the case were granted title to property improperly conveyed by the state of Tennessee north of this border. In the ruling, the Supreme Court asserted the fundamental right of states and nations to establish their borders regardless of private contract, and made a fundamental statement about the rights of parties to object to a trial court ruling under the rules of civil procedure. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 29239630 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 15150 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 975874056 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:case
  • Poole v. Fleeger, (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-02-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1837 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Burgess Poole and Others, Plaintiffs in Error v. The Lessee of John Fleeger and Others (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Plaintiffs are granted title to land in Kentucky improperly conveyed by Tennessee prior to the Compact of 1820 establishing the two states' mutual border. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Poole v. Fleeger (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Story (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 11 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 185 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 36 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Poole v. Fleeger, 36 U.S. (11 Pet.) 185 (1837), is a 7-to-0 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the states of Kentucky and Tennessee had properly entered into an agreement establishing a mutual border between the two states. The plaintiffs in the case were granted title to property improperly conveyed by the state of Tennessee north of this border. In the ruling, the Supreme Court asserted the fundamental right of states and nations to establish their borders regardless of private contract, and made a fundamental statement about the rights of parties to object to a trial court ruling under the rules of civil procedure. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Poole v. Fleeger (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • Burgess Poole and Others, Plaintiffs in Error v. The Lessee of John Fleeger and Others (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License