dbo:abstract
|
- El Cas Hollingsworth contra Perry (en anglès: Hollingsworth v. Perry) van ser una sèrie de casos dels tribunals federals dels Estats Units que van legalitzar el matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe en l'Estat de Califòrnia. El cas va començar en 2009 en el Tribunal de Districte dels Estats Units per al Districte Nord de Califòrnia, que va determinar que la prohibició del matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe viola la igualtat de protecció de la llei. Aquesta decisió va anul·lar la Proposició 8, que havia prohibit el matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe. Després que l'Estat de Califòrnia es negués a defensar la Proposició 8, els promotors oficials de la mateixa van intervenir i van apel·lar a la Cort Suprema. El cas es va litigar durant els governs tant d'Arnold Schwarzenegger com de Jerry Brown, per la qual cosa es va conèixer com a Perry contra Schwarzenegger i Perry contra Brown, respectivament. Com Hollingsworth contra Perry, va arribar finalment al Tribunal Suprem dels Estats Units, que va sostenir que, d'acord amb els precedents, els promotors oficials d'una mesura d'iniciativa de votació no tenien dret, en virtut de l'Article III, a apel·lar una sentència adversa d'un tribunal federal quan l'Estat es negava a fer-lo. L'efecte de la sentència va ser que el matrimoni homosexual a Califòrnia es va reprendre en virtut de la decisió del judici del Tribunal de Districte a partir de 2010. Altres troballes de la decisió del judici, incloent les conclusions de fet del Jutge Vaughn Walker, continuen controlant el precedent per a futurs casos rellevants. El cas va ser registrat en la Cort Suprema en 570 U.S. 693 (2013) (Expedient nº12-144). (ca)
- Hollingsworth v. Perry (vorher Perry v. Schwarzenegger und Perry v. Brown) ist ein Verfahren vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten zur Verfassungswidrigkeit eines Verbots der gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehe in Kalifornien. Das Verfahren begann mit einer Klage vor dem Bundesbezirksgericht in San Francisco gegen Proposition 8, ein erfolgreiches Referendum, mit dem die so geändert wurde, dass nur noch Ehen zwischen einem Mann und einer Frau staatlich anerkannt würden. In ihrem Antrag behaupten die Kläger, Proposition 8 würde gegen das Rechtsstaatlichkeitsgebot und den Gleichheitsgrundsatz der Bundesverfassung verstoßen. Am 26. Juni 2013 entschied der Supreme Court, dass die Gegner der gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehe in Kalifornien nicht berechtigt waren zu klagen; damit gilt in diesem Bundesstaat wieder das ursprüngliche Urteil des erstinstanzlichen District Court und somit das Recht für Homosexuelle zu heiraten. (de)
- Hollingsworth v. Perry was a series of United States federal court cases that re-legalized same-sex marriage in the state of California. The case began in 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which found that banning same-sex marriage violates equal protection under the law. This decision overturned ballot initiative Proposition 8, which had banned same-sex marriage. After the State of California refused to defend Proposition 8, the official sponsors of Proposition 8 intervened and appealed to the Supreme Court. The case was litigated during the governorships of both Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jerry Brown, and was thus known as Perry v. Schwarzenegger and Perry v. Brown, respectively. As Hollingsworth v. Perry, it eventually reached the United States Supreme Court, which held that, in line with prior precedent, the official sponsors of a ballot initiative measure did not have Article III standing to appeal an adverse federal court ruling when the state refused to do so. The effect of the ruling was that same-sex marriage in California resumed under the district court trial decision from 2010. Other findings from the trial decision, including Judge Vaughn Walker's findings of fact, remain controlling precedent for future relevant cases. The case was docketed with the Supreme Court at 570 U.S. 693 (2013) (Docket No. 12-144). (en)
- Hollingsworth v. Perry adalah sejumlah kasus di pengadilan federal Amerika Serikat yang melegalkan pernikahan sesama jenis di negara bagian Kalifornia. Kasus ini dimulai pada tahun 2009 di pengadilan distrik utara Kalifornia yang memutuskan bahwa pelarangan pernikahan sesama jenis melanggar asas . Keputusan ini dibatalkan oleh inisiatif referendum Proposition 8 yang telah melarang pernikahan sesama jenis. Setelah negara bagian Kalifornia menolak mempertahankan Proposition 8, para pendukung resmi Proposition 8 melakukan intervensi dan mengajukan banding. Kasus ini dipertimbangkan selama masa jabatan gubernur Arnold Schwarzenegger dan Jerry Brown, sehingga kasus ini juga dikenal dengan nama Perry v. Schwarzenegger dan Perry v. Brown. Kasus Hollingsworth v. Perry pada akhirnya mencapai Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat, dan mahkamah tersebut memutuskan bahwa para pendukung inisiatif referendum tersebut tidak memiliki kedudukan hukum untuk mengajukan banding ketika negara bagian menolak melakukan hal tersebut, karena mereka tidak dapat menunjukkan bahwa mereka telah dirugikan oleh keputusan tersebut. Dampak keputusan ini adalah kelanjutan . (in)
|
dbo:thumbnail
| |
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 135540 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
|
- dbr:California_Courts_of_Appeal
- dbr:California_Department_of_Public_Health
- dbr:California_Supreme_Court
- dbr:American_Family_Association
- dbr:American_Foundation_for_Equal_Rights
- dbr:Amicus_curiae
- dbr:Precedent
- dbr:Proposition_8
- dbr:ProtectMarriage.com
- dbr:Public_Broadcasting_Service
- dbr:Question_of_fact
- dbr:Romer_v._Evans
- dbr:Same-sex_marriage
- dbr:Samuel_Alito
- dbr:San_Diego
- dbr:San_Francisco
- dbr:San_Francisco_Bay_Area
- dbr:En_banc
- dbr:Minority_group
- dbr:Political_movement
- dbr:Social_movement
- dbr:Proffer
- dbr:Bill_Clinton
- dbr:Bill_Moyers
- dbr:David_Boies
- dbr:Defense_of_Marriage_Act
- dbr:Dennis_Hollingsworth
- dbc:2013_in_United_States_case_law
- dbr:Homosexual_agenda
- dbr:John_Paul_Stevens
- dbr:John_Roberts
- dbr:Joyce_L._Kennard
- dbr:Judicial_disqualification
- dbr:Judicial_review
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_570
- dbr:Pepperdine_University
- dbr:Republican_Party_(United_States)
- dbr:United_States_Constitution
- dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit
- dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California
- dbr:United_States_v._Windsor
- dbr:University_of_California,_Davis
- dbr:University_of_Cambridge
- dbr:Vaughn_Walker
- dbr:Vikram_Amar
- dbr:Violence_against_LGBT_people
- dbr:David_Blankenhorn
- dbr:California_Attorney_General
- dbr:California_Proposition_8_(2008)
- dbr:Defendant
- dbr:Developmental_psychology
- dbr:Domestic_partnership
- dbr:Domestic_partnership_in_California
- dbr:Due_Process_Clause
- dbr:Indispensable_party
- dbr:Initiative
- dbr:Injunction
- dbr:Intervention_(law)
- dbr:Social_inequality
- dbr:Obergefell_v._Hodges
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
- dbr:Courage_Campaign
- dbr:Court_order
- dbr:Cross-examination
- dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
- dbr:George_Chauncey
- dbr:National_Organization_for_Marriage
- dbr:Opening_statement
- dbr:Social_networking_service
- dbr:Strict_scrutiny
- dbr:Rebuttal
- dbr:Question_of_law
- dbr:Christian_Legal_Society_v._Martinez
- dbr:Cinema_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Claremont_McKenna_College
- dbr:Clarence_Thomas
- dbr:Class_action
- dbr:Edward_Leavy
- dbr:Ellen_DeGeneres
- dbr:Gavin_Newsom
- dbr:Gender_role
- dbr:George_W._Bush
- dbr:Georgia_State_University
- dbr:Governor_of_California
- dbr:Mores
- dbr:N._Randy_Smith
- dbr:Concurring_opinion
- dbr:Constitutional_amendment
- dbr:Constitutional_law
- dbr:Conversion_therapy
- dbr:Theodore_Olson
- dbr:Equal_Protection_Clause
- dbr:Equality_before_the_law
- dbr:LGBT_history
- dbr:LGBT_parenting
- dbr:Marriage_license
- dbc:2013_in_LGBT_history
- dbr:Anthony_Kennedy
- dbr:Antonin_Scalia
- dbr:Antonio_Villaraigosa
- dbr:Appellate_court
- dbr:Legal_opinion
- dbr:Liberty_Counsel
- dbr:Los_Angeles_County,_California
- dbr:Loving_v._Virginia
- dbr:Loyola_Law_School
- dbr:Lujan_v._Defenders_of_Wildlife
- dbr:Maggie_Gallagher
- dbr:Chris_Geidner
- dbr:Silicon_Valley
- dbr:Stanford_University
- dbr:Stay_of_execution
- dbr:Stephen_Breyer
- dbr:Stephen_Reinhardt
- dbr:Steve_Inskeep
- dbr:Strauss_v._Horton
- dbr:Closing_argument
- dbr:Dennis_Herrera
- dbr:Fundamental_rights
- dbr:Donald_B._Verrilli,_Jr.
- dbr:Party_(law)
- dbr:Pedophilia
- dbr:Social_stigma
- dbr:Social_support
- dbr:Standing_(law)
- dbr:Stay_of_proceedings
- dbr:Swing_vote
- dbr:2000_United_States_presidential_election
- dbr:Barbara_Boxer
- dbr:8_(play)
- dbr:Brokeback_Mountain
- dbr:Brooklyn
- dbr:Bush_v._Gore
- dbr:C-SPAN
- dbr:CBS
- dbr:CNN
- dbc:United_States_same-sex_union_case_law
- dbr:Time_100
- dbr:TruTV
- dbr:Twitter
- dbr:U.S._District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California
- dbr:UCLA_School_of_Law
- dbr:Will_&_Grace
- dbr:William_Eskridge
- dbr:Case_or_Controversy_clause
- dbr:Dissenting_opinion
- dbr:County_Clerk
- dbr:Harvard_Law_Review
- dbr:Lea_Brilmayer
- dbr:Minority_stress
- dbr:Adam_Lambert
- dbr:Adrienne_Barbeau
- dbc:2008_California_Proposition_8
- dbc:2010_in_LGBT_history
- dbr:Al_Gore
- dbr:Alameda_County,_California
- dbr:Allen_v._Wright
- dbr:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
- dbr:Daniel_N._Robinson
- dbr:Erwin_Chemerinsky
- dbr:Ethics_and_Public_Policy_Center
- dbr:Expert_witness
- dbr:Federal_Supplement
- dbr:Federalism_in_the_United_States
- dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Fox_News_Channel
- dbr:Brian_S._Brown
- dbr:Brief_(law)
- dbr:Pacific_Justice_Institute
- dbr:Paris_Hilton
- dbr:Pasadena,_California
- dbr:Bishop_(Catholic_Church)
- dbr:Equal_protection_under_the_law
- dbr:Judicial_activism
- dbr:Judicial_interpretation
- dbr:Legal_doctrine
- dbr:Per_curiam_decision
- dbr:Social_equality
- dbr:Privilege_(evidence)
- dbr:Procedural_law
- dbr:Request_for_production
- dbr:Gregory_M._Herek
- dbr:Griswold_v._Connecticut
- dbr:Hearing_(law)
- dbr:Helen_Zia
- dbr:Involuntary_dismissal
- dbr:James_Ware_(judge)
- dbr:Baker_v._Nelson
- dbr:Tani_Cantil-Sakauye
- dbr:Courtroom_photography_and_broadcasting
- dbr:Tess_Harper
- dbr:The_Case_Against_8
- dbr:The_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints
- dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_California
- dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Arnold_Schwarzenegger
- dbr:Arye_Gross
- dbr:Aspen_Institute
- dbr:Associated_Press
- dbc:2010_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation
- dbr:Advice_and_consent
- dbr:Charles_J._Cooper
- dbr:Jerry_Brown
- dbr:Jerry_Sanders_(politician)
- dbr:John_C._Eastman
- dbr:KQED_Inc.
- dbr:Kamala_Harris
- dbr:Karcher_v._May
- dbr:Kenneth_P._Miller
- dbr:Kim_McLane_Wardlaw
- dbr:L._Ed._2d
- dbr:Lady_Gaga
- dbr:Lambda_Legal
- dbr:Lawrence_v._Texas
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Systemic_bias
- dbr:Homophobia
- dbr:The_Advocate_(LGBT_magazine)
- dbr:Trial
- dbr:Diamond_v._Charles
- dbr:Dianne_Feinstein
- dbr:Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Marsha_Berzon
- dbr:Political_science
- dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor
- dbr:Civil_and_political_rights
- dbr:Ilan_Meyer
- dbr:Imperial_County,_California
- dbr:In_re_Marriage_Cases
- dbr:Michael_Daly_Hawkins
- dbr:Michael_Lamb_(psychologist)
- dbr:National_Center_for_Lesbian_Rights
- dbr:National_Public_Radio
- dbr:Oral_argument_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Campaign_for_California_Families
- dbr:Case_citation
- dbr:Case_or_Controversy_Clause
- dbr:Race_(human_classification)
- dbr:Raymond_C._Fisher
- dbr:Certified_question
- dbr:Certiorari
- dbr:Yale_University
- dbr:YouTube
- dbr:Mandamus
- dbr:Same-sex_relationship
- dbr:Stanford_Law_Review
- dbr:Social_history
- dbr:United_States_Reports
- dbr:United_States_district_court
- dbr:Verbatim_theatre
- dbr:Preliminary_injunction
- dbr:Impeachment
- dbr:In_camera
- dbr:Summary_judgment
- dbr:Plaintiff
- dbr:Video_hosting_service
- dbr:M._Edward_Whelan_III
- dbr:Standard_of_review
- dbr:Trial_court
- dbr:Sidney_Runyan_Thomas
- dbr:Rational_basis_review
- dbr:Yarmulkes
- dbr:Arizonans_for_Official_English
- dbr:California_state_elections,_November_2010
- dbr:Legal_standing
- dbr:Alliance_Defense_Fund
- dbr:F.3d
- dbr:Nancy_Cott
- dbr:Theodore_B._Olson
- dbr:U.S._Solicitor_General
- dbr:We_the_People
- dbr:File:Kristin_Perry_and_Sandra_Stier,_San_Francisco_Pride_2013.jpg
- dbr:File:10-16696,_10-16751_-_Perry_v._Schwarzenegger_-_Part_1_-_Standing.webm
- dbr:File:10-16696,_10-16751_-_Perry_v._Schwarzenegger_-_Part_2_-_Merits.webm
- dbr:File:11-16577_Perry,_City_and_county_of_SF_v._Brown,_Hollingsworth_et._al..webm
- dbr:File:11-17255_Perry_v._Brown_et._al._and_Hollingsworth_et._al..webm
- dbr:File:Hollingsworth_v._Perry.jpg
- dbr:W:_United_States_Constitution
|
dbp:align
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-03-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Hollingsworth v. Perry, (en)
|
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
| |
dbp:docket
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Petitioners v. Kristin M. Perry, et al. (en)
|
dbp:holding
|
- After lower courts ruled that California's ban on same-sex marriage was an unconstitutional violation of the right to equal protection under the law, the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage opponents did not have standing to intervene as they could not demonstrate that they were harmed by the decision. (en)
|
dbp:joindissent
|
- Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Scalia, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- Hollingsworth v. Perry (en)
|
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oralargument
| |
dbp:otherSource
| |
dbp:otherUrl
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
|
- 172800.0 (dbd:second)
- 25920.0 (dbd:second)
- Cert. granted, . (en)
- Answered, Perry v. Brown, 52 Cal.4th 1116 ; (en)
|
dbp:quote
|
- Today's decision is by no means California's first milestone, nor our last, on America's road to equality and freedom for all people. (en)
- It was still emotional to be denied [a marriage license]. But in all fairness [to the clerk], she handled it really well. [Her words] reiterated that we were denied equal rights. It made us feel that we made the right decision to be a part of this case. (en)
- What's at stake in the Perry case is not just the right of California voters to reaffirm the definition of marriage as only between a man and a woman, but whether marriage will be redefined in every state in the nation. (en)
|
dbp:source
|
- 0001-08-04 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- —Jeffrey Zarrillo, co-plaintiff (en)
- —ProtectMarriage.com, defendant-intervenor (en)
|
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:width
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dct:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- El Cas Hollingsworth contra Perry (en anglès: Hollingsworth v. Perry) van ser una sèrie de casos dels tribunals federals dels Estats Units que van legalitzar el matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe en l'Estat de Califòrnia. El cas va començar en 2009 en el Tribunal de Districte dels Estats Units per al Districte Nord de Califòrnia, que va determinar que la prohibició del matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe viola la igualtat de protecció de la llei. Aquesta decisió va anul·lar la Proposició 8, que havia prohibit el matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe. Després que l'Estat de Califòrnia es negués a defensar la Proposició 8, els promotors oficials de la mateixa van intervenir i van apel·lar a la Cort Suprema. El cas es va litigar durant els governs tant d'Arnold Schwarzenegger co (ca)
- Hollingsworth v. Perry (vorher Perry v. Schwarzenegger und Perry v. Brown) ist ein Verfahren vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten zur Verfassungswidrigkeit eines Verbots der gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehe in Kalifornien. Das Verfahren begann mit einer Klage vor dem Bundesbezirksgericht in San Francisco gegen Proposition 8, ein erfolgreiches Referendum, mit dem die so geändert wurde, dass nur noch Ehen zwischen einem Mann und einer Frau staatlich anerkannt würden. In ihrem Antrag behaupten die Kläger, Proposition 8 würde gegen das Rechtsstaatlichkeitsgebot und den Gleichheitsgrundsatz der Bundesverfassung verstoßen. Am 26. Juni 2013 entschied der Supreme Court, dass die Gegner der gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehe in Kalifornien nicht berechtigt waren zu klagen; damit gilt in diesem B (de)
- Hollingsworth v. Perry was a series of United States federal court cases that re-legalized same-sex marriage in the state of California. The case began in 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which found that banning same-sex marriage violates equal protection under the law. This decision overturned ballot initiative Proposition 8, which had banned same-sex marriage. After the State of California refused to defend Proposition 8, the official sponsors of Proposition 8 intervened and appealed to the Supreme Court. The case was litigated during the governorships of both Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jerry Brown, and was thus known as Perry v. Schwarzenegger and Perry v. Brown, respectively. As Hollingsworth v. Perry, it eventually reached the United States Supr (en)
- Hollingsworth v. Perry adalah sejumlah kasus di pengadilan federal Amerika Serikat yang melegalkan pernikahan sesama jenis di negara bagian Kalifornia. Kasus ini dimulai pada tahun 2009 di pengadilan distrik utara Kalifornia yang memutuskan bahwa pelarangan pernikahan sesama jenis melanggar asas . Keputusan ini dibatalkan oleh inisiatif referendum Proposition 8 yang telah melarang pernikahan sesama jenis. Setelah negara bagian Kalifornia menolak mempertahankan Proposition 8, para pendukung resmi Proposition 8 melakukan intervensi dan mengajukan banding. Kasus ini dipertimbangkan selama masa jabatan gubernur Arnold Schwarzenegger dan Jerry Brown, sehingga kasus ini juga dikenal dengan nama Perry v. Schwarzenegger dan Perry v. Brown. Kasus Hollingsworth v. Perry pada akhirnya mencapai Mahkam (in)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Hollingsworth v. Perry (en)
- Cas Hollingsworth contra Perry (ca)
- Hollingsworth v. Perry (de)
- Hollingsworth v. Perry (in)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:depiction
| |
foaf:homepage
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Petitioners v. Kristin M. Perry, et al. (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |