iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bicknell_v._Comstock
About: Bicknell v. Comstock
An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Bicknell v. Comstock, 113 U.S. 149 (1885), was an action to recover the cost paid for a tract of land in Iowa and the value of the improvements made by the defendant. The complaint alleged a conveyance by Bicknell to one Bennett, the subsequent transfer to the defendant by sundry mesne conveyances, valuable improvements on the premises made by Bennett and his grantees, and a failure of title in Bicknell when the deed was made by reason of a superior title in the State of Iowa under a land grant. Judgment below for plaintiff, to reverse which this writ of error was brought.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Bicknell v. Comstock, 113 U.S. 149 (1885), was an action to recover the cost paid for a tract of land in Iowa and the value of the improvements made by the defendant. The complaint alleged a conveyance by Bicknell to one Bennett, the subsequent transfer to the defendant by sundry mesne conveyances, valuable improvements on the premises made by Bennett and his grantees, and a failure of title in Bicknell when the deed was made by reason of a superior title in the State of Iowa under a land grant. Judgment below for plaintiff, to reverse which this writ of error was brought. The mutilation (without the consent and against the protest of the grantee) of a patent for public land by the Commissioner of the Land Office, after its execution and transmission to the grantee, and the like mutilation of the record thereof, do not affect the validity of the patent. A state statute of limitations as to real actions begins to run in favor of a claimant under a patent from the United States on the issue of the patent and its transmission to the grantee. The lapse of time provided by a statute of limitations as to real actions vests a perfect title in the holder. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 15666195 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2359 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 904916317 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:case
  • Bicknell v. Comstock, (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-01-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1885 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Bicknell v. Comstock (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Bicknell v. Comstock (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Miller (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 5 (xsd:integer)
dbp:submitdate
  • 0001-01-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:submityear
  • 1885 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 149 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 113 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Bicknell v. Comstock, 113 U.S. 149 (1885), was an action to recover the cost paid for a tract of land in Iowa and the value of the improvements made by the defendant. The complaint alleged a conveyance by Bicknell to one Bennett, the subsequent transfer to the defendant by sundry mesne conveyances, valuable improvements on the premises made by Bennett and his grantees, and a failure of title in Bicknell when the deed was made by reason of a superior title in the State of Iowa under a land grant. Judgment below for plaintiff, to reverse which this writ of error was brought. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Bicknell v. Comstock (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Bicknell v. Comstock (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License