Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/05/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 29th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|source=https://m.facebook.com/PanachandINC/photos/a.331670587340163/566935697146983/?type=3&source=54&ref=page_internal}} Goldsztajn (talk) 13:10, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|source=https://twitter.com/GayatriKailash/status/1383755564652535808/photo/1}} Goldsztajn (talk) 13:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dynacorp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely that uploader is the original copyright holder for these movie posters and magazine covers.

Njd-de (talk) 13:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Files have been mass-deleted by Billinghurst. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:01, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kimsa Sok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo here and on kmwiki

Minoraxtalk 16:18, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Given the user is blocked on 2 other projects it does not seem that this request should run for 7 day. Deleted speedily under F10. --Herby talk thyme 08:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Stephen Cribb (1875-1963)

[edit]

We have had several files on Commons for a number of years attributed to S Cribb of Southsea (Portsmouth, England) with an unknown date of death. There are a number of invalid licences used against the images but the general presumption is that he died over 70 years ago. From census and death records at FamilySearch, I have confirmed that he died in 1963 (See Wikidata entry). That suggests the majority of his work is still in copyright until January 2034. Unless we have some alternative grounds to justify loss of copyright protection, all of his works will need to be deleted. However, prior to deletion, I'd recommend transfer of eligible files to English Wikipedia as the majority were published prior to 1926 (so PD under US law). We can set a template on the Wikipedia files that will identify them for transfer back to Commons in 2034. --From Hill To Shore (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep As a procedural matter - these images have different sources and copyright statuses, so can't be lumped together like this. File:HMAS Australia HMS Victory.jpg forms part of the Australian War Memorial's collection for instance and the AWM states that it is in the public domain [1] so it's fine to have here. This image is also out of scope given that the AWM lists the maker as "unknown" - it seems that a Commons contributor added the claim it was taken by this person without any supporting evidence. Likewise File:Australian submarine AE2 arriving at Portsmouth to prepare for her voyage to Australia.jpg is attested to be 'No known copyright restrictions' by the Australian Maritime Museum - it is entirely possible that it was/is the owner of this image. Other images are listed as being out of copyright as they form part of now-PD books. As such, the images need to be considered separately, or at least in groups, with a focus on those whose status on Commons rests on the date of death. Nick-D (talk) 07:18, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Broichmore: It looks like you identified Stephen Cribb as the author of File:HMAS Australia HMS Victory.jpg. Can you please comment on your reasoning? From Hill To Shore (talk) 10:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rcbutcher: @From Hill To Shore: Because Rcbutcher had added a credit line of : Purchased from Mr Stephen Cribb of Southsea, England. back on 16 December 2009. Broichmore (talk) 10:51, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately Rcbutcher has passed away, so we can't seek any further clarification on that front. Wayback Machine has its earliest copy of the webpage in 2016, so we can't see the information Rcbutcher had in 2009. I'll strike this one from the nomination for now. If evidence emerges later that Cribb was the author, it can be relisted for consideration at that time. From Hill To Shore (talk) 11:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As two editors are voting for a procedural keep, I will close this one down and relist. From Hill To Shore (talk) 11:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural Keep: Closing nomination to relist as separate nominations. From Hill To Shore (talk) 11:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The images have been relisted under the following discussions:

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen presente en la página web de Avelina Lésper desde 2018. En esta versión está cortada. Luisalvaz (talk) 01:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, blatant Copyright Violation, false source, false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate submission in error. Pithecanthropus4152 (talk) 04:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 08:06, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is Dachas = David Hash? Since this is the only uploads by this user, I doubt this is not own work A1Cafel (talk) 09:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Dachas (= (Da)vid (C) (Has)h) is David's account. For proof, I've added a link to the empty Dachas page in my Twitter bio, where I originally posted the photo.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dachas (talk • contribs) 09:52, 29 May 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, I think it's own work of David Hash. The user found Wikipedia and Commnons just now. =) Great photo, thanks! (Although it is a pity that almost all great photos of lunar eclipses are from one country, from the USA) --Brateevsky {talk} 11:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Tập tin này có hình dạng Mặt Trăng ngoài không gian. Trorens218 (talk) 15:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Chắc ngôn ngữ sang tiếng Việt cho rằng: "Dachas = David Hash? Vì đây là video duy nhất do người dùng này tải lên, tôi nghi ngờ đây không phải là tác phẩm của riêng mình". Trorens218 (talk) 15:55, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's enough for identity verification.  I withdraw my nomination--A1Cafel (talk) 16:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is used without permission on my Tweet Yamatonadesiko1942 (talk) 02:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is used without permission on my Tweet Yamatonadesiko1942 (talk) 17:50, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I'm sorry. I have uploaded the image (referenced with your nickname and account) to expand the information in that section. If it bothers you, I'm sorry again. All the best. XxSuguSxX (discusión) 21:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Tillietshabo (talk) 00:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. --Minoraxtalk 05:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 00:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redundant to files in Category:Sampaloc-Tambubong-Caingin, San Rafael, Bulacan Arterial Road. I don't see a need to actually separate this kind of stuff into specific time frames, a road is a road.

Minoraxtalk 08:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near duplicates & redundant to other files in category.

Minoraxtalk 08:46, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:43, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Почему мои файлы удаляют без причины?! Я требую восстановление всех файлов, которые были загружены мной ранее! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ana Avdeeva (talk • contribs) 07:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ana Avdeeva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal photographs.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:32, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ana Avdeeva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are still out of COM:SCOPE, and reuploading them does not help this.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:21, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, low resolution, and superseded by a .svg file. Worldlydev (talk) 12:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also delete: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Tustna_komm_new.png&redirect=no


Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional spam Zabe (talk) 12:20, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope unused spam selfie image. Wikimedia is not a private and personal photo-album. No educational value. Acabashi (talk) 13:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope unused spam selfie image. Wikimedia is not a private and personal photo-album. No educational value. Acabashi (talk) 13:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moazahmedfikry3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian - Out of Scope

--Alaa :)..! 13:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian - Out of Scope --Alaa :)..! 13:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RFlackAttack (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EXOL0804 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:36, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal image. SCP-2000 16:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal image. SCP-2000 16:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope/ spam Hoo man (talk) 16:47, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional spam Zabe (talk) 19:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Дубликат File:Mechanism of Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution.png -- Tomasina (talk) 19:47, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor-quality hand-drawn chemcial structure. Have File:Rubidium-carbonate-2D-structure.svg as high-quality alternative. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 21:38, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've requested WP:OTRS, however, this logo fails COM:TO. Missvain (talk) 00:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:56, 6 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 29 May 2021 --Krdbot 14:09, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cele body (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works/dubious claims of own work. File:Leanne Riley 2018.jpg is cropped from [2].File:Scout_Taylor-Compton_Big.png is an edited version of [3]. File:GJL in July 2019.png is a photomontage without source information. File:Mara_Giantess_Eat.gif has a watermark from a service for making gifs from youtube videos, and the original source is not identified.

Spicy (talk) 01:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong filename HansJAB (talk) 17:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please request a file rename via COMMONS:RENAME. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong filename HansJAB (talk) 18:25, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please request a file rename via COMMONS:RENAME. --Missvain (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Speedy (Selfie).

Speedy deletion challenged at COM:UDR. Opening regular discussion. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete, there are plenty of freely licensed photos at flickr.com showing fishing boats or people in Cocodrie actually fishing. As far as I can tell, neither uploader nor anybody else added this photo to the article en:Cocodrie, Louisiana. I have checked the logs from CommonsDelinker and there is no record that this photo was used in any Wikimedia project on May 27, 2021. Thuresson (talk) 10:12, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment I believe it has long been established that Commons is not just for images used in articles; it is also for supplemental material illustrating in-scope subjects in more detail than would be seen in articles with one or two images. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:47, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • BTW, I try to keep familiar with free licensed images of South East Louisiana on Flickr, and try to curate and copy the better ones to Wikimedia. (There were not so many of Cocodrie when I uploaded this in January 2011.) The largest batch of photos with hits for "Cocodrie" on flickr are a set by a user who labeled everything about a trip as "Cocodrie" as that was a destination on the trip, but many of the photos are not of Cocodrie, but of other locations in S. E. Louisiana - I have identified actual locations of some of them and uploaded them categorized appropriately. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - I've cropped the file which is located at File:Fishing at Cocodrie LA Christian (cropped).jpg - Generally speaking if there's not enough images of an area then we tend to keep images regardless of quality however in this specific case there's 27 files of this area although admittedly not of the buildings behind the guy.
Due to the guy taking up 96& of the image it renders it useless (usage-wise) and scope-wise IMHO it fails SELFIE/PERSONAL IMAGE.
As stated I have cropped the file which is a poor crop but there's not much one can do - I would hope the new file whilst poor can still be of use to someone years down the line if when for instance these are demolished etc. –Davey2010Talk 20:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:59, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for art in the United States. Sculpture created in 2012, therefore not PD. Andre Carrotflower (talk) 01:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't follow why this is up for deletion. What is FoP? Tommycw1 (talk) 02:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Huh - I learned something new today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. So in theory you could upload it to Wikipedia if it's used as the primary identification for an article specifically about the sculpture, but you wouldn't be able to upload it to commons or use the photo anywhere else on Wikipedia. Is that correct Andre? TheNewMinistry (talk) 02:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what Wikipedia's policy is on fair-use material (i.e. whether such files are usable in multiple articles) but you're correct that they can't be hosted at Commons. -- Andre Carrotflower (talk) 05:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:59, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:59, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 03:59, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Syria A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Syria A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Syria A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Syria A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Syria A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Syria A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prepared by "Commuter Transportation Services, Inc" and contains a copyright notice. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.4.73 05:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:28, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.4.73 05:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:28, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.4.73 05:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:28, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.4.73 05:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:28, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.4.73 05:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:28, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This painting is an exact copy of File:MargareteBayMantua.jpg Ecummenic (talk) 06:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a framed 2D artwork can not give any additional copyright to the uploader. Arjunaraoc (talk) 07:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 04:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not free, no indication that this is CC0 Etzedek24 (but on Commons!) (talk) 22:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 14:29, 9 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 1 June 2021 --Krdbot 19:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Flag of Turkey.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 00:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-made original images. None are actually official flags or representative of data. Hoax/fancraft and they are not in use. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is a better and higher resolution of this image available now Thecorrector21 (talk) 18:55, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by AntiCompositeNumber at 22:36, 15 June 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1): https://www.ispr.gov.pk/press-release-detail.php?id=5649 --Krdbot 01:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PCP unlikely ViperSnake151 (talk) 04:55, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 03:47, 16 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 8 June 2021 --Krdbot 13:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is copyrighted Pali1972 (talk) 06:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 03:46, 16 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 8 June 2021 --Krdbot 13:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TO. Highly likely the artwork on this label is copyrighted. Commons:Deminimis does not apply. Missvain (talk) 00:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TO. Highly likely the artwork on this label is copyrighted. Commons:Deminimis does not apply. Missvain (talk) 00:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TO. Highly likely the artwork on this label is copyrighted. Commons:Deminimis does not apply. Missvain (talk) 00:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible COM:TO. Highly likely the artwork on this label is copyrighted. Commons:Deminimis does not apply. Missvain (talk) 00:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible COM:TO. Highly likely the artwork on this label is copyrighted. Commons:Deminimis does not apply unless you cut out the wine and have a very bokey'd out bread basket. Missvain (talk) 00:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement of BYD Skyrail https://www.skyrailbahia.com.br/o-projeto/diferenciais/ Sorocabano 32 (talk) 01:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Olá, o intuito do uso das imagens, que encontram-se publicamente na página da referida instituição, é divulgar o trabalho e informar a sociedade do andamento do projeto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro Inácio Machado Neto (talk • contribs) 23:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - That may be, but the source is explicitly copyrightewd -- "© Copyright - skyrail bahia 2019. ". .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement of BYD Skyrail https://www.skyrailbahia.com.br/banco-de-imagens/ Sorocabano 32 (talk) 01:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC) Olá, o intuito do uso das imagens, que encontram-se publicamente na página da referida instituição, é divulgar o trabalho e informar a sociedade do andamento do projeto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro Inácio Machado Neto (talk • contribs) 23:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sorocabano 32: can't {{FoP-Brazil}} applies here? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The user is posting content from a well-defined copyrighted website. The images are a mixture of real photos and electronic mockups, created for commercial and publicity purposes. If the user obtains permission to use the images of the BYD company, he must send them to the email to "permissions-pt@wikimedia.org" and use the corresponding license. Sorocabano 32 (talk) 01:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement of BYD Skyrail https://www.skyrailbahia.com.br/banco-de-imagens/ Sorocabano 32 (talk) 01:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC) Olá, o intuito do uso das imagens, que encontram-se publicamente na página da referida instituição, é divulgar o trabalho e informar a sociedade do andamento do projeto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro Inácio Machado Neto (talk • contribs) 23:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for art in the United States. Sculpture created in 1983, therefore not PD. TheNewMinistry (talk) 02:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • There's no copyright notice on the statue, and a US Copyright Office catalog search turns up no subsequent copyright registrations under the name Malcolm Alexander (sculptor's identity per [4]). Therefore, PD-US-1975-89 applies, and the file's licensing information has been updated to reflect as much. -- Andre Carrotflower (talk) 05:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for art in the United States. Sculpture created in 1983, therefore not PD. TheNewMinistry (talk) 03:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • There's no copyright notice on the statue, and a US Copyright Office catalog search turns up no subsequent copyright registrations under the name Malcolm Alexander (sculptor's identity per [5]). Therefore, PD-US-1975-89 applies, and the file's licensing information has been updated to reflect as much. -- Andre Carrotflower (talk) 05:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Skopje was liberated on November 14 and there was a snow. This photo is from the summer time and is obvious deception. See for example this photo, which was captured on 13/14 November. Jingiby (talk) 08:08, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere in the description nor in the photo is mentioned thta the photo is taken on 14th of November as this editor Jingiby wants you to manipulate with. Thanks, --Forbidden History (talk) 09:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then this photo is not from 1944, because in December the weather is even colder. Definitely not from the newly liberated Skopje. It is not clear when and where it was made and it is clearly manipulative.
It's one thing to ask to change the description if you find it suspicious, but you are trying to manipulate instead. I assume you know all the weather forecast for everyday from 13 of November till 31 of December, is that correct? You say its not clear where it's made. That tells enough of your attempts with this manipulations--Forbidden History (talk) 09:20, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is much more likely that this photo was captured on a meeting in Skopje with Macedonian soldiers returning after the end of the war with Germany in the late May in 1945. Jingiby (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - obviously not taken in November or December. Also, an image with an unknown author cannot be CC-0. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Skopje was sized on November 14 and there was a snow. See for example this photo, which was captured on November 13 in Skopje. This photo is made in the summer and is obvious deception. Jingiby (talk) 08:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere in the description nor in the photo is mentioned that the photo is taken on 14th of November as this editor Jingiby wants you to manipulate with. Thanks, --Forbidden History (talk) 09:08, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then this photo is not from 1944, because in December the weather is even colder. Definitely not from the newly liberated Skopje. It is not clear when and where it was made and it is clearly manipulative.
It's one thing to ask to change the description if you find it suspicious, but you are trying to manipulate instead. I assume you know all the weather forecast for everyday from 13 of November till 31 of December, is that correct? --Forbidden History (talk) 09:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is much more likely that this photo was captured on a meeting in Skopje with Macedonian soldiers returning after the end of the war with Germany in the late May in 1945. Jingiby (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - obviously not taken in November or December. Also, an image with an unknown author cannot be CC-0. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This deletion request applies only for first version, not for whole file. There is no freedom of panorama in Gambia, so I cropped copyrighted poster out. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made criticized area unrecognizable, because in my opinion it's the better way. The cropped image looks bad, if ever you should at least cut off the whole poster. --Im Fokus (talk) 04:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Still first version should be delete. Taivo (talk) 14:06, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Blurring face does not make the image OK. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored second version (my crop) after discussion with Jim on his talkpage. Taivo (talk) 20:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Arbalete as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: This sign has a wrong design. The correct one is here: File:Italian traffic signs - inizio autostrada.svg  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Regasterios as Fair use (Fair use)  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacks a license for home country Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploading a new one Editordailyplanet (talk) 14:21, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claim of own work is not credible. The image description states "Photo E Sreedharan ( The Economic Times )" which would indicate it was copied from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ Whpq (talk) 14:25, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from [6]. It even says in the metadata that the copyright holder is "SEA SERPENT", which is probably not Lorenauy. The same issue likely concerns all of Lorenauy's uploads. Paranaja (talk) 14:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the image would be in New Zealand's public domain I can't determine if it would be in the public domain for the United States (any tips on determining this would be appreciated). The current license "cc-by-3.0" wouldn't apply for this image as the National Library of New Zealand states the image cannot be used for commercial purposes. Salavat (talk) 15:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - It is PD-New Zealand and was on the URAA date, so it is PD in the USA as well. The NAtional LIbrary's prohibition on commercial use is not valid for a PD image. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since). I will look for a valid Israeli license amd and add it. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Deletion_requests/File:Mandate_passport_used_by_Israeli_pilot_Ephraim_Henenson_to_bring_the_Avia_S-199_to_Israel_in_1948.jpg&oldid=565900196

Hello, I am a collector of old documents and passports for over 15 years now and the image is from a item in my private archive. What else can I do to prevent it from being deleted? I am sharing an image from my collection for the public, with only historical purposes. Thank you, Neil Huddyhuddy (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Huddyhuddy: , another user tagged the copyright © license as being invalid, this was because you used a Creative Commons license which applies to the photograph, but the document itself needed to have its own license otherwise it would have been deleted. I added "Template:PD-Israel" as this file is no longer copyrighted by the Israeli government. The initial user just wanted you to clarify that the document you uploaded was in fact free from copyright © or had another form of free license compatible with the scope of Wikimedia Commons (See: "Commons:Licensing"). I added the template, so that should prevent this file from being deleted. As a clarification, I oppose its deletion and started this page to stop an otherwise automated deletion by a robot 🤖. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:44, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Scanning/photographing document doesn't make uploader and author, so any additional license tags except public domain one are invalid and must be removed. Sure, uploader may mention in description that he/she digitized it. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:44, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, The document is part of my private collection of old documents and passport. I upload images for educational purposes only, for sharing them with the public. I do not ask anything for sharing them, just that the public can enjoy them. Thank you again, Neil Huddyhuddy (talk) 11:07, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Propably an old photo which is not made by Flickr uploader. Matlin (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The cover of a self-published release. Notability? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:48, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -- Author is not uploader. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The cover of a self-published release. Notability? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unclear copyright. Pibwl (talk) 19:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

US unpublished family photos are copyright for 120 years per the Hirtle chart so these will come into the public domain in 2031. The current licence does not apply to unpublished works.

Ww2censor (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Shyamal L. (talk) 03:30, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. (Could be uploaded to the English Wikipedia as fair use, particulary the cropped version, under the "fair use dead person" rubric. If you like. However, a (person who claims to be and probablu is) a grandchild objected, so enh, I'd forget it.) Herostratus (talk) 19:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source, https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s60s1xbg, describes the picture as "Photograph taken by Salt Lake Tribune staff". That's inconsistent with {{PD-USGov}}, since the staff of the Salt Lake Tribune are not officers or employees of the United States government. bjh21 (talk) 22:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: website screenshot CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacks a license for home country Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Flag of Russia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image without EXIF, probably a copyvio. C messier (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo. No original author or permission. Smooth O (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exact duplicate of File:Paco Blanco eta Fernando Cossio.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:14, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:08, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

自分のプライバシーを傷つけると気がつきました 由紀奈 (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:DW. --JuTa 20:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is being used by a self-promoting individual across wiki's (en and simple). Page was deleted on simple. Requesting under Commons:Deletion_policy#Self-promotion_or_vandalism/attack PotsdamLamb (talk) 21:08, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 00:03, 20 July 2021 UTC: No permission since 10 July 2021 --Krdbot 13:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kosim141 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works. Film scrin + https://kinolift.com/ru/16767/media + https://rg.ru/2018/01/16/vyshel-pervyj-tizer-rossijskogo-fentezi-vratar-galaktiki.html

--NoFrost (talk) 19:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping to close nomination, file already deleted. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work --NoFrost (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work --NoFrost (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work --NoFrost (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work --NoFrost (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

غير مكتمل John.dayli (talk) 20:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal image of non contributor. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

غير مكتمل John.dayli (talk) 20:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping to close nomination, file already deleted. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

غير مكتمل John.dayli (talk) 20:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping to close nomination, file already deleted. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

غير مكتمل John.dayli (talk) 20:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping to close nomination, file already deleted. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This people is not notable 103.139.9.250 20:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I was going to close this with no action as there is no File:Writer in the woods.jpg, but I see now that this is actually about File:LITU ANAM.photography shihab mohammad.jpg. Leaving for another admin to decide, as I'm not sure what to make of the Bengali description (per Google translation, it could possibly indicate notability - a writer? - but I'm not sure). Gestumblindi (talk) 19:35, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Housekeeping to close nomination, file already deleted. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded with picture https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/Wagen_152%40Hauptbahnhof-ROB_am_29.04.2021.jpg a much better quality of the bus in the same angle OliverZenglein (talk) 20:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled-down duplicate of File:Cancun Strand Luftbild (22143397586).jpg

Same applies to:

scaled-down duplicate of File:Cancun beach aerial - Luftbild (19853298089).jpgcapmo (talk) 20:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, we have a similar much better one: File:2001 03 11 Schloss Schönbrunn 03 (50988179343).jpg Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The two images are not the same. This one isn't smaller than the other, nor is the other which is blurry better than this one. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know if this is a public palce according to the Canadian law but in all cases this seems to be a temporary decoration of the interior of a store and that fail the criterion "permant" of Commons:Freedom_of_panorama/Americas#Canada. See a quick google search for the images of the same store to see how they can change quickly of decoration [7]. Furthermore not even need of this google search, have you ever been inside a modern popular store, whatever the brand, don't they change the decoration regularly? is to change regularly synonym of "permanenlty"? Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:57, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:43, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine ausreichende Lizenzierung, Quelle scheint zwar mit Hochlader zu korrespondieren - Urheber ist aber offensichtlich ein Dritter Lutheraner (talk) 18:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild ist gekauft, alle Rechte liegen beim DBFZ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (talk • contribs) 05:49, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bitte ggf. per E-Mail eine Genehmigung ans "Volunteer Response Team" schicken. Siehe COM:VRT. Danke. --Rosenzweig τ 20:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo,
vielen Dank für die Info. Mir ist das "Problem" leider nicht klar. Urheberrechte an Bildern liegen grundsätzlich beim Creator/Fotografen und können meines Wissens nach auch nicht abgetreten werden. Die vollständigen Nutzungsrechte wurden uns für das Bild überlassen. An welche Adresse soll ich was senden?
Besten Dank und Gruß, Paul Trainer (DBFZ) Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (talk) 06:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Moin Paul, bitte Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) von einer "offiziellen" E-Mail-Adresse aus (nicht googlemail oder so) an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org, danke! Gruß, Achim55 (talk) 10:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: now has a VRT permission. --Rosenzweig τ 17:56, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without any CC BY 3.0 by 公民行動影音 123.193.196.71 18:12, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The video was licensed by CC-BY-NC-SA per the start of video. SCP-2000 01:51, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see [8]YouTube上只能選擇YouTube標準授權或CC-BY,而不能選擇其他CC系列授權,根據公民行動影音官網的授權敘述,應認定授權為CC-BY-NC,故不合Commons要求。另建議去信公民行動影音請他們不要標註CC-BY。--Xiplus#Talk 今天, 09:53 am (UTC+8)」 —Outlookxp (talk) 02:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multi-licensing is allowed. See commons:Multi-licensing. Njzjz (talk) 10:43, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without any CC BY 3.0 by 公民行動影音 123.193.196.71 18:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The video was licensed by CC-BY-NC-SA per the start of video. SCP-2000 01:51, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Multi-licensing is allowed. See commons:Multi-licensing.--Wpcpey (talk) 03:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:32, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

公民行動影音 has no CC 3.0 Outlookxp (talk) 18:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official channel from themselves and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:44, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I suspect this video may not taken by 公民行動影音 as they are a Taiwen media per their official website. SCP-2000 01:46, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Multi-licensing is allowed. See commons:Multi-licensing.--Wpcpey (talk) 03:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中國新網網 has no CC 3.0. Please see www.chinanews.com/scroll-news/news1.html” 未经授权禁止转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像,违者将依法追究法律责任。” Please also note this picture has no original 中國新聞網 title of top right. It also violates CC.by 3.0(姓名標示...以及表示是否有對內容上做出變更。 Modifications and adaptations must be indicated)Outlookxp (talk) 18:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep all images that were released by 中国新闻网 (China News Service) and were nominated by User:Outlookxp in 2021/05/29. No valid reason per my comment in Commons:Deletion_requests/File:民众悼念罗伯.jpg. SCP-2000 05:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: per above. Cypp0847 (talk) 02:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:29, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中国新闻网 has no cc 3.0 Outlookxp (talk) 18:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中國新網網 has no CC 3.0. Please see www.chinanews.com/scroll-news/news1.html” 未经授权禁止转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像,违者将依法追究法律责任。” Please also note this picture has no original 中國新聞網 title of top right. It also violates CC.by 3.0(姓名標示...以及表示是否有對內容上做出變更。 Modifications and adaptations must be indicated)

Outlookxp (talk) 18:44, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中国新闻网 has no cc 3.0 Outlookxp (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:36, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中国新闻网 has no cc 3.0 Outlookxp (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:37, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see www.chinanews.com/scroll-news/news1.html” 未经授权禁止转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像,违者将依法追究法律责任。”

commons:PCP :The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted.

Outlookxp (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中国新闻网 has no cc 3.0 Outlookxp (talk) 18:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video is come from the official channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中國新網網 has no CC 3.0. Please see www.chinanews.com/scroll-news/news1.html” 未经授权禁止转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像,违者将依法追究法律责任。Outlookxp (talk) 18:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please see http://www.chinanews.com/common/footer/law.shtml

” 1)凡本网注明“来源:中国新闻网”或带有“中新社”和“中新网”电头的所有文字、加盖“中新社”或“中新网”水印且注明“中新社发 ****摄”、“中新社记者 ****摄”或“中新网记者 ****摄”的图片稿件、来源为“中国新闻网”或视频画面上标有“中新视频”、“中新社”、“中新网”、“CNSTV”的视频,版权均属中新社或中新网所有,未经本网书面授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载、链接、转贴或以其他方式使用,否则即为侵权,本网将依法追究其法律责任--00:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

These pictures need written authorization(书面授权) by 中国新闻网. commons:PCP :The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted.

” 2) 使用时必须保留原电头“中新社”或“中新网”

These pictures were deleted 中新社 title of the top-left corner, and User:SKBNK ‎ has no any indication for these Modifications. It also violates CC.by 3.0(姓名標示...以及表示是否有對內容上做出變更。 Modifications and adaptations must be indicated)

3)经本网书面授权的媒体、网站,只能从“供稿服务”里下载取稿,使用时必须保留原电头“中新社”或“中新网”,并注明“稿件来源:中国新闻网”或“稿件来源:中新网”,违者本网将依法追究责任。同时,本网保留修改、更正、删节已供稿件的权利。...请与原著作权人联系确认其真实性并获取相应授权]...

Written authorization of pictures must be downloaded by web conjugation service (供稿服务). Youtube has 供稿服务 by 中国新闻网. And these pictures need author' aggree.

--Outlookxp (talk) 00:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No valid reason. The video was released under valid CC license. See also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:航拍浙江温岭槽罐车爆炸事故现场.png and Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_91#User:Walter_Grassroot. @Outlookxp I urge you should stop nominate files that released by 中国新闻网 Youtube channel and discuss in here first. SCP-2000 01:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please note this picture has no original 中國新聞網title. It also violates CC.by 3.0(姓名標示...以及表示是否有對內容上做出變更。 Modifications and adaptations must be indicated) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Outlookxp (talk • contribs) 04:46, 30 May 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]
There is sufficient source information in file description page (i.e. cite the link of original video). That is clearly enough for fulfill CC-BY Attribution requirement. --SCP-2000 05:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Techyan 's comment can clearly explain why videos that published by 中國新聞網 Youtube channel don't violate COM:PCP policy. --SCP-2000 05:38, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[9]「YouTube上只能選擇YouTube標準授權或CC-BY,而不能選擇其他CC系列授權...。--Xiplus#Talk 今天, 09:53 am (UTC+8)」 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Outlookxp (talk • contribs) 02:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your quote is unrelated to this deletion request as here is about China News Service, not 公民行動影音. --SCP-2000 02:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You quoted another comment. However, this case is unrelated to choosing CC licnese or Youtube standard license. --SCP-2000 05:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per SCP-2000, but I'd love to add an entry for China News at Commons:Problematic sources, to warn further users to check their videos carefully of carefully before uploading here. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:50, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep See Commons:Deletion requests/File:航拍浙江温岭槽罐车爆炸事故现场.png, another screenshot from CNS(中国新闻社) video. --ClayM300 (talk) 10:51, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. No valid reasons provided. The video was released under the Creative Commons Attribution license on the official YouTube channel of the news source. --Cold Season (talk) 22:45, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中國新網網 has no CC 3.0. Please see www.chinanews.com/scroll-news/news1.html” 未经授权禁止转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像,违者将依法追究法律责任。” Please also note this picture has no original 中國新聞網 title of top right. It also violates CC.by 3.0(姓名標示...以及表示是否有對內容上做出變更。 Modifications and adaptations must be indicated)

Outlookxp (talk) 18:57, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中国新闻网 has no cc 3.0. Please see www.chinanews.com/scroll-news/news1.html” 未经授权禁止转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像,违者将依法追究法律责任。Please note this picture has no original 中國新聞網title of top right. Outlookxp (talk) 19:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中国新闻网 has no cc 3.0 Outlookxp (talk) 19:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel on 1:06 and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中国新闻网 has no cc 3.0 Outlookxp (talk) 19:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYVIO:

  1. @Walden69, Asclepias, BotMultichill, and Multichill: licence seems to be incompatible with indicated source (initial license: "non-transferable license" & "we do not allow to resell" vs {{Copyrighted free use}})
  2. please, do a redirect to Drapeau de Saint-Malo (20è siècle).svg
  3. thanks, En rouge (talk) 19:55, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and remark. Redirect made. --Ellywa (talk) 20:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中國新網網 has no CC 3.0. Please see www.chinanews.com/scroll-news/news1.html” 未经授权禁止转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像,违者将依法追究法律责任。Please note this picture has no original 中國新聞網 title of top right. It also violates CC.by 3.0(姓名標示...以及表示是否有對內容上做出變更。 Modifications and adaptations must be indicated)Outlookxp (talk) 18:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:31, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:32, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中國新網網 has no CC 3.0. Please see www.chinanews.com/scroll-news/news1.html” 未经授权禁止转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像,违者将依法追究法律责任。” Please also note this picture has no original 中國新聞網 title of top right. It also violates CC.by 3.0(姓名標示...以及表示是否有對內容上做出變更。 Modifications and adaptations must be indicated)Outlookxp (talk) 18:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video. The screenshot available on 0:16--Wpcpey (talk) 22:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:32, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:33, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中國新網網 has no CC 3.0. Please see www.chinanews.com/scroll-news/news1.html” 未经授权禁止转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像,违者将依法追究法律责任。” Please also note this picture has no original 中國新聞網 title of top right. It also violates CC.by 3.0(姓名標示...以及表示是否有對內容上做出變更。 Modifications and adaptations must be indicated) Outlookxp (talk) 18:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

commons:PCP :The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted.—-Outlookxp (talk) 05:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multi-licensing is allowed. See commons:Multi-licensing.--Wpcpey (talk) 03:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:36, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中國新網網 has no CC 3.0. Please see www.chinanews.com/scroll-news/news1.html” 未经授权禁止转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像,违者将依法追究法律责任。”

Please see http://www.chinanews.com/common/footer/law.shtml ” 2) 使用时必须保留原电头“中新社”或“中新网”

The picture has no original 中國新聞網 title of top right. It also violates CC.by 3.0(姓名標示...以及表示是否有對內容上做出變更。 Modifications and adaptations must be indicated)

Outlookxp (talk) 18:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: CC license. --Rosenzweig τ 20:35, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中国新闻网 has no cc 3.0. Please note this picture has no original 中國新聞網 title of top right. It also violates CC.by 3.0(姓名標示...以及表示是否有對內容上做出變更。 Modifications and adaptations must be indicated)OOutlookxp (talk) 19:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video. The screenshot available in 2:22--Wpcpey (talk) 22:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:42, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:42, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中國新網網 has no CC 3.0. Please see www.chinanews.com/scroll-news/news1.html” 未经授权禁止转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像,违者将依法追究法律责任。” Please also note this picture has no original 中國新聞網 title of top right. It also violates CC.by 3.0(姓名標示...以及表示是否有對內容上做出變更。 Modifications and adaptations must be indicated)

Outlookxp (talk) 19:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:43, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

中国新闻网 has no cc 3.0 Outlookxp (talk) 19:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:43, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see http://www.chinanews.com/common/footer/law.shtml ” 2) 使用时必须保留原电头“中新社”或“中新网” These pictures were deleted 中新社 title of the top-left corner, and User:SKBNK ‎ has no any indication for these Modifications. It also violates CC.by 3.0(姓名標示...以及表示是否有對內容上做出變更。 Modifications and adaptations must be indicated))Outlookxp (talk) 19:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Please noted that the video comes from the official YouTube channel and they use CC terms to release the video.--Wpcpey (talk) 22:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: per discussion. License CC-BY-SA on the youtube film still today. --Ellywa (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]