Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/03/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
uploader did not create the item portrayed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Mys 721tx Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Text information only: out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep, speedy close, in scope, used at sister website, Wikisource, at s:Tribute to Leonard Nimoy by Adam Schiff. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 02:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment - Please see COM:INUSE, specifically, "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough." Thank you! -- Cirt (talk) 02:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)- Comment Please see COM:L at Excluded educational content : Certain content is excluded from Commons, not because it is intrinsically non-educational, but because there are other Wikimedia Foundation projects that are more appropriate to host such content. This applies both to media files and to text... Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text. Purely textual material such as plain-text versions of recipes, lists of instructions, poetry, fiction, quotations, dictionary definitions, lesson plans or classroom material, and the like are better hosted elsewhere, for example at Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, Wikiversity or Wikisource. That the files were uploaded and immediately place in use doesn't exempt them from being out of Scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE, is quite clear, specifically, "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough." Thank you! -- Cirt (talk) 02:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The problem is, this isn't a media file it's plain text. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is, Ellin Beltz (talk · contribs) wants to willfully ignore COM:INUSE. -- Cirt (talk) 03:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- CommentThere is no need to get personal. There is a serious question here: COM:L clearly states that some material is educationally excluded. That includes plain text documents. It also reads "..Wikimedia Commons hosts only media files such as photographs, scanned images, diagrams, animations, audio (e.g. music, spoken dialogue) and video clips, along with any associated metadata. Explanatory and other text is permitted on the file page only to the extent to which it advances Commons' aim and is not excluded educational content." The issue of COM:INUSE is not being ignored by me here. The document here is pure text, no media no logos no photos - only text. As such it would be better hosted elsewhere. The discussion here is about a file, not personalities. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Ellin Beltz (talk · contribs) behavior is to keep citing one page while ignoring the applicability of COM:INUSE. Sounds a lot like w:WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, which is most disturbing. -- Cirt (talk) 03:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Citing a Wikipedia policy on Wikimedia Commons isn't applicable. There are many Wikipedia policies (e.g. "Fair Use" which are not Commons policies. It would helpful for you to avoid personal attacks and deal with the content of the nomination. Commons deletes many "in use" images if they are COM:COPYVIOs and/or out of COM:SCOPE. Images must be in scope to be hosted on Commons. Please address the content of the nomination instead of additional personal remarks. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Please address why COM:INUSE should be ignored by Ellin Beltz (talk · contribs) to the detriment of our sister sites and educational use at those sister sites like Wikisource. -- Cirt (talk) 03:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Ellen pointed out Commons:Project_scope#Excluded_educational_content which also mentions However, Commons can be used to host such material if included in a shareable media file that is of use to one of the other Wikimedia Foundation-hosted (WMF) projects (so, scanned copies of existing texts that are useful to other WMF projects—e.g. to serve as the basis of a reliable, verifiable source—are in scope). Also allowed are files which embody something of value over and above raw text. For example, files consisting of scans of out-of-copyright books, newspapers and the like which preserve original font, layout, embedded images and the like are within scope. I'd argue that preserving original font, layout, embedded images (in this case the logo) are the key reasons to keep this file on Wikimedia Commons + it allows for easier re-use for sisterprojects such as Wikipedia or Wikidata. Nonetheless it would make sense to provide a transcription of this text through Wikisource. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 04:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the helpful suggestion of additional sister project use, Christoph Braun (talk · contribs), now also at d:Q19430689. -- Cirt (talk) 04:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, any set of scans that do not have graphics would meet Ellin's definition. Wikisource routinely moves such works to Commons because Commons is where they belong. There are hundreds of thousands of works on the English Wikisource alone, a very large percentage of which are nothing but text (but text that has a layout and can be used as an authoritative source in side-by-side transcription). Commons hosts most scans of all-text books, statutes, and a wide-variety of other text-only material that is used at Wikisources (the only exceptions generally involve differences in licensing between Commons and the Sources). Do you propose deleting every book that does not contain graphics? If you think these works don't belong on Commons then you need to start a discussion at an appropriate location not nominate them for deletion. Nomination of scans or documents that are properly licensed and in-use on Wikisource is a very bad idea. --Doug(talk • contribs) 05:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: This is an authoritative work that in my eyes doesn't qualify as "raw text" in the spirit of Commons:SCOPE. Even if it wasn't yet used on Wikisource, the fact that's it's within scope is good enough for me. We have (and use) {{Book}} for a reason... just my two cents. The Haz talk 07:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Speedily kept as this is an obvious case: PDFs that are used or possibly used for Wikisource are within COM:SCOPE. Please be refered to Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats from which I take the following quote:
- Files that might realistically be useful to one or more other Wikimedia projects, e.g. Wikisource or Wikibooks, should be kept; deletions should not be based on the sole ground that the file would be better hosted on one of those other projects. Any media file that is realistically useful to or is within the scope of even one other Wikimedia Foundation project can be hosted here.
- Remember that Wikisource may use PDF or DjVu files in order to proofread or create source texts: Therefore, scans of suitable editions of notable public domain works are almost always within scope for this reason. That said, remember that editorial decisions involved in preparing a text from several sources may allow a new copyright, so the editions used must be out of copyright themselves.
Commons hosts myriads of such file which are in use for Wikisource projects. We have PDFs, DjVus, scans of individual pages etc — all what we can get from public domain text sources of published books and relevant texts which are in the possible scope of Wikisource. The quote given by Ellin Beltz (which, BTW, is not from COM:L as claimed but from COM:SCOPE) stops short before following clarification:
- However, Commons can be used to host such material if included in a shareable media file that is of use to one of the other Wikimedia Foundation-hosted (WMF) projects (so, scanned copies of existing texts that are useful to other WMF projects—e.g. to serve as the basis of a reliable, verifiable source—are in scope)
Summarily according to our policies this file is within our COM:SCOPE. I've speedied this as it is obvious and as this is possibly disrupting to the Wikisource communities. We do not need this again. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Text information only: out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, speedy close, in scope, used at sister website, Wikisource, at s:Statement by the President on the Passing of Leonard Nimoy. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 02:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Please see COM:INUSE, specifically, "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough." Thank you! -- Cirt (talk) 02:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Please see COM:L at Excluded educational content : Certain content is excluded from Commons, not because it is intrinsically non-educational, but because there are other Wikimedia Foundation projects that are more appropriate to host such content. This applies both to media files and to text... Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text. Purely textual material such as plain-text versions of recipes, lists of instructions, poetry, fiction, quotations, dictionary definitions, lesson plans or classroom material, and the like are better hosted elsewhere, for example at Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, Wikiversity or Wikisource. That the files were uploaded and immediately place in use doesn't exempt them from being out of Scope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ellin Beltz (talk • contribs)
- COM:INUSE, is quite clear, specifically, "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough." Thank you! -- Cirt (talk) 03:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete per nom. This plain-text document is not a “media file“: the very first point of the scope policy says, “The following are not considered media files, and may not be hosted here: […] Files which are representative merely of raw text”. A signed letter on White House stationery would be another story altogether, but the educational value of this file consists solely in its verbal content; as an image it is utterly generic.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- It is in use at a sister site. That makes it in scope here. -- Cirt (talk) 03:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- That doesn’t trump everything else. The passage you quoted above even says, “A media file that is in use …” (emphasis mine), and the passage I quoted is where that term is defined. This document clearly falls under “excluded educational content.”—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- It's a form of media, yes. -- Cirt (talk) 03:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- A published statement is a historical document, and in certain circumstances becomes the de facto record where audiovisual images are not available. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, exactly, thank you! -- Cirt (talk) 04:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- A published statement is a historical document, and in certain circumstances becomes the de facto record where audiovisual images are not available. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- It's a form of media, yes. -- Cirt (talk) 03:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Odysseus, you're leaving out part of the definition "Files which are representative merely of raw text (e.g. ASCII files, raw source code listings as mentioned above, etc)." Ignoring completely the fact that this bears the logo of a US Gov't agency, it's a PDF that contains formatting and metadata far beyond that in an ASCII file, if you copy the text into vi, save it, and upload it, then you'd have an ASCII file. --Doug(talk • contribs) 05:52, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- That doesn’t trump everything else. The passage you quoted above even says, “A media file that is in use …” (emphasis mine), and the passage I quoted is where that term is defined. This document clearly falls under “excluded educational content.”—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per Cirt -- this is in scope by definition, as it is in use by a sister project. However, I think Ellin brings up a legitimate point to be discussed: to the degree that files like this are useful only to English Wikisource, and not to other projects, is there a good reason to keep them here instead of English Wikisource? The function it's designed for (verification of the text) is fulfilled regardless of which project it lives at. In some cases, a PDF or DJVU is useful to other projects; but in many cases, it isn't. So, I hadn't really thought about this before -- but I'd be happy to see further discussion. -Pete F (talk) 03:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. This is the very soul of Commons, to be a central educational repository to help out the sister sites. -- Cirt (talk) 03:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- That is only used by one wiki is a choice, and does not make it out of scope at Commons, and it gives any wiki the opportunity to use it, which can only happen when it is at Commons. It is not up to Commons to further determine after that. This is a record that a statement was made by a person about the death of another person. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed. -- Cirt (talk) 04:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- That is only used by one wiki is a choice, and does not make it out of scope at Commons, and it gives any wiki the opportunity to use it, which can only happen when it is at Commons. It is not up to Commons to further determine after that. This is a record that a statement was made by a person about the death of another person. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep within scope. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 04:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Ellen pointed out Commons:Project_scope#Excluded_educational_content which also mentions However, Commons can be used to host such material if included in a shareable media file that is of use to one of the other Wikimedia Foundation-hosted (WMF) projects (so, scanned copies of existing texts that are useful to other WMF projects—e.g. to serve as the basis of a reliable, verifiable source—are in scope). Also allowed are files which embody something of value over and above raw text. For example, files consisting of scans of out-of-copyright books, newspapers and the like which preserve original font, layout, embedded images and the like are within scope. I'd argue that preserving original font, layout, embedded images (in this case the logo) are the key reasons to keep this file on Wikimedia Commons + it allows for easier re-use for sisterprojects such as Wikipedia or Wikidata. Nonetheless it would make sense to provide a transcription of this text through Wikisource. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 04:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the helpful suggestion of additional sister project use, Christoph Braun (talk · contribs), now also at d:Q19430723. -- Cirt (talk) 04:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The nominator is poorly informed. probably 100's of thousands of scans of just text are among the millions of books on the Wikisources and almost all are hosted here. They are not raw text and neither is this important document from the US Government, which is no different from the many thousands of pages of scans of statutes that are contained here. See my comment above about raw text.--Doug(talk • contribs) 05:52, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Speedily kept as this is an obvious case: PDFs that are used or possibly used for Wikisource are within COM:SCOPE. Please be refered to Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats from which I take the following quote:
- Files that might realistically be useful to one or more other Wikimedia projects, e.g. Wikisource or Wikibooks, should be kept; deletions should not be based on the sole ground that the file would be better hosted on one of those other projects. Any media file that is realistically useful to or is within the scope of even one other Wikimedia Foundation project can be hosted here.
- Remember that Wikisource may use PDF or DjVu files in order to proofread or create source texts: Therefore, scans of suitable editions of notable public domain works are almost always within scope for this reason. That said, remember that editorial decisions involved in preparing a text from several sources may allow a new copyright, so the editions used must be out of copyright themselves.
Commons hosts myriads of such files which are in use for Wikisource projects. We have PDFs, DjVus, scans of individual pages etc — all what we can get from public domain text sources of published books and relevant texts which are in the possible scope of Wikisource. The quote given by Ellin Beltz (which, BTW, is not from COM:L as claimed but from COM:SCOPE) stops short before following clarification:
- However, Commons can be used to host such material if included in a shareable media file that is of use to one of the other Wikimedia Foundation-hosted (WMF) projects (so, scanned copies of existing texts that are useful to other WMF projects—e.g. to serve as the basis of a reliable, verifiable source—are in scope)
Summarily according to our policies this file is within our COM:SCOPE. I've speedied this as it is obvious and as this is possibly disrupting to the Wikisource communities. We do not need this again. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
mehrmalige verwendung ohne Namensnennung auf u.a. Sozialen Plattformen DanielaFrank (talk) 09:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dann schicke denen doch einen Anwalt an der Hals. --Hydro (talk) 10:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Sagt sich immer so leicht. werde ich auch in den Fällen versuchen, nur zurzeit soll es aus Wiki raus gelöscht werden. Finde es ziemlich krass das so ein Akt betrieben werden muss. Immerhin bin ich Urheber!
DanielaFrank (talk)
Kept: speedy kept, license is not revokable Denniss (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joeyang2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo images, no permission.
Yann (talk) 09:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:19, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: not only out of scope, also vanadlized photo Amada44 talk to me 17:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grossmeister (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused private images of low quality, poor educational purpose.
Achim (talk) 20:43, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grossmeister (talk · contribs)
[edit]Эlcobbola talk 17:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of previously deleted images. Эlcobbola talk 17:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jona (SG) IMG 7245 ShiftN.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/Gary Mark Smith
No images, too much text for the Commons. This page must either be deleted or be moved to a Wikipedia.--
Bo-rhein-sieg 18:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
deleted —JeremyA 01:32, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Hexadecimal symbols by Boolean hexadecimal
[edit]Original research. These symbols are exclusively used to cross-wiki promote the users idea of a proper display of hexadecimal files. As he stated on de wiki:
„die Zeichen habe ich entworfen. Quellen außerhalb der Wikipedia bin ich erst dabei zu schaffen, was eine Aufgabe für die nächsten Jahre sein dürfte. Mein Ziel war es Hexadezimalziffern zu entwerfen, …“
- (Rough translation: I designed the signs. external sources I'm on to create, that will be a job for the next years. It was my goal to develop hexadecimal digits …)
As this original research is a massive violation of the guidelines of nearly all wikimedia projects, (see WP:NOR and interwikis) there is no use for these files. In order to protect our projects from original research, I request deletion of these files. --Code·is·poetry 09:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Image:0000.jpg
- Image:000L.jpg
- Image:00L0.jpg
- Image:00LL.jpg
- Image:0123.4567.89AB.CDEF(standard).jpg
- Image:0L00.jpg
- Image:0L0L.jpg
- Image:0LL0.jpg
- Image:0LLL.jpg
- Image:Hexa.jpg
- Image:L000.jpg
- Image:L00L.jpg
- Image:L0L0.jpg
- Image:L0LL.jpg
- Image:LL00.jpg
- Image:LL0L.jpg
- Image:LLL0.jpg
- Image:LLLL.jpg
- as Codeispoetry mentioned the ban of original research is one of the key points in the wikipedia projects. As there is no other use for this images --> Delete ...Sicherlich Post 09:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, as I don't see a useful usage for these symbols on Wikimedia projects. --32X 11:14, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. (Können wa die nich speedyen?) abf /talk to me/ 11:24, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete +1 May i upload the secret letters i "designed" when i was 14? --Drahreg01 15:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Strong keep The images themselves are potentially useful though not all uses of them may be legitimate. --Simonxag 01:15, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment Could you explain how these files could be used in a proper way? Code·is·poetry 09:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete These images are not useful at all and are in no way related to encyclopaedic content. --Stephkoch 03:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Original research. ViperSnake151 13:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete These files are outside the Commons:Scope. -Nard 22:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. As said above. --TM 10:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
deleted, --Polarlys 13:10, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Cruelty to animals just for the photo. Sound Animal Protection Act does not allowed. According to the law does not allow such photos.217.93.148.94 11:36, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- cher anonyme, si vous scrutez attentivement la photo, vous verrez qu'il s'agit en fait d'un bout de papier blanc roulé (avec lequel mon chat jouait avant de s'endormir) et non d'une cigarette...
- Cordialement
- Sombresprit (talk) 07:42, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- On Sombresprit wikipedia user side following caption: "J'essaie de commencer à fumer... mais je n'y arrive pas." In englisch: "I try to start smoking ... but I can not." To give the impression which is damaged an animal is advertising for cruelty to animals and even banned this Act ago.
- --217.93.163.216 13:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Bon, écoutez, cher(s) inconnu(s), si, premièrement, vous n'êtes pas capables de comprendre un clin d'oeil à un film, ni l'humour en général, je n'y peux rien, mais si vous continuez à vous exprimer non seulement en anglais, de plus dans un anglais incompréhensible (ces messages me semblent, sans être un expert, bafouer les règles grammaticales élémentaires de l'anglais), et via des IP qui semblent dédiés uniquement à venir m'enquiquiner sur cette image, je vais demander la cloture de cette requête sur le champ pour harcèlement, j'ai mieux à faire que de perdre mon temps avec des IP flottantes.
- Sombresprit (talk) 13:59, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 12:14, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for speedy deletion gave as reason only "inappropriate image" without explaining what was supposed to be inappropriate about it. Seems to be an attempt at censorship.
I believe the image should be kept. Keep AdeMiami (talk) 08:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- The additional reason is given on the tag. Go look.--HappyLogolover2011 (talk) 23:22, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- The full reason given is "Inappropriate image. sexy and nude image is not allowed." In fact, nudity is allowed. There are hundreds of such photos here. There's even a category for it. So still no sufficient reason for deletion. --Ebyabe (talk) 14:59, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
- The additional reason is given on the tag. Go look.--HappyLogolover2011 (talk) 23:22, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Info The current delete request comes from User:71.94.172.52 who erroneously added comments to the closed discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:At the nudist beach.jpg. The newest comments read "Sorry but thats not good and theres rules about that here. Mediawiki can take it down very easily. So therefore it needs to be deleted." Then User:71.94.172.52 tagged the file for speedy deletion with the reason "Inappropiate image". A couple of users have clouded the issue somewhat by deleting the speedy deletion tag twice. User:71.94.172.52 had added the edit comment "Theres rules about that picture and should not be allowed on the site." when restoring his request for deletion. I will restore the original intent "Inappropriate image" to the current delete tag. I will also post a message on the user's talk page asking for clarification on what rule he believes this violates. --Arg342 (talk) 09:05, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Info Image was previously listed for deletion and kept. Commons:Deletion requests/Image:At the nudist beach.jpg. Infrogmation (talk) 12:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per previous listing; free licensed image in use in multiple projects; no reason offered for deletion beyond anon's apparent dislike of nudity and mistaken belief that such is "not allowed". Infrogmation (talk) 12:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Comment Sorry but thats not good and theres rules about that here. Mediawiki can take it down very easily. So therefore it needs to be deleted.--71.94.172.52 04:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Above comment is by the deletion nominator; I moved it here to the current discussion from Commons:Deletion requests/Image:At the nudist beach.jpg Infrogmation (talk) 12:11, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Could we please be given a reason for this delete. Which rule? What is inappropriate? I didn,t see a geotag but that is optional.--ClemRutter (talk) 12:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I see no valid reason of deletion. Nudism is a subject that is in the scope. And nude in public makes the picture acceptable in terms of rights of the person. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason for deletion has been given. No personality rights issues. In use on one or more Wikimedia projects = in scope. Thryduulf (talk) 15:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Comment Uh the reason is sexy and nude image. Thats the reason it should be deleted and i gave a valid reason by the way so now you guys know its not allowed.--71.94.172.52 18:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Which rule? What is inappropriate? Uh the reason is sexy and nude image is a point of view. All wikipedia policies are written down on a page, they have been discussed on a talk page, and when I ask for a rule I want you to direct me to the page where the policy is written down so I can read it. We must verify the information. Until then there is no argument to answer.--ClemRutter (talk) 22:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Still no valid reason for deletion that I can see. As I read it, this is within the scope of Commons. In particular COM:CENSORSHIP clearly allows this.--Arg342 (talk) 22:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing's changed since the discussion 3 years ago. --Ebyabe (talk) 00:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- Comment FYI, the same user also request a speedy delete of this image, because it contained nudity. It seems the user is under the impression that nude images shouldn't be here, period. --Ebyabe (talk) 17:49, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep There's nothing to discuss until we know, in the proposer's opinion, which rule has been broken and how it has been broken.--SueTwo (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I support the opinions expressed by users User:Infrogmation, User:ClemRutter and User:SueTwo. Regards, Kmw2700 (talk) 17:03, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep No rule broken. --Salocin
Diskussion 11:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC) - Keep These appear to be nudists/naturists nude at a nudist/naturist location and not acting sexually or offensively. Therefore acceptable under Wiki rules and clearly/explicitly described by the image title. Tim Forcer (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept Anon has gained no support for deletion, and has failed to provide any evidence for their repeated claim that it in violation of "rules" nor what those "rules" might be. No Commons policies favoring deletion have been cited. Infrogmation (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Naked young woman 86.168.178.67 16:08, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept, per previous DR with broad concensus. Commons is not censored. Also, file in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
blurry image Alan Liefting (talk) 20:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per num. -- Geagea (talk) 14:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
This is your obvious printscreen, first edit, small size and the "prinscreennlook". Natuur12 (talk) 23:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- The metadata suggests that it was taken with a photocamera (Olympus SP590UZ). And 2.048 × 1.536 pixels doen't seem to be that small? LeeGer (talk) 09:55, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Point taken that it is not that small. I'm going to withdraw this one till I have further evidence. Natuur12 (talk) 12:26, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:26, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Test and empty file Brateevsky {talk} 10:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Test. INeverCry 01:59, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Minhazuddinbd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text document of questionable notability, out of scope.
- File:Chader Kahini.pdf
- File:Planer Kahini.pdf
- File:Oxford Grammar.PDF
- File:Xclusive General Knowledge Bangladesh.pdf
- File:How to make Bootable Pendrive.pdf
- File:Bangladesh - বাংলাদেশ.pdf
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Minhazuddinbd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:বসে পানি পান করাও একটি সুন্নাহ.jpeg
- File:Road - BD Photography.jpeg
- File:Why this difference in bangladesh.jpg
- File:Madhabpur Pilot High School.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, especially File:বসে পানি পান করাও একটি সুন্নাহ.jpeg who contains obvious promo --Scoopfinder(d) 16:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Minhazuddinbd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Commons:Derivative works from software screenshots.
- File:Hack Computer System.pdf
- File:Change Windows 7 s start-log-on-Background.pdf
- File:১ মিনিটে Samsung Galaxy মোবাইল আনলক(কোন সফটওয়ার ছাড়াই)...পানির চেয়ে সহজ!!.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Physical world map 2004 with country borders and capitals; Robinson Projection: standard parallels 38°N and 38°S (click for large 2 MB version) Ji young yun ....... (talk) 12:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: An error of an specific file or category is not a valid reason for deleting the whole this Gallery. If you found errors in some maps, please fix or improve them before, individually. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Files uploaded by Pradeesh Abraham (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal repository. We can only accept files which has educational value.
- File:Pradeesh Abraham jpj 1.jpg
- File:Pradeesh Abraham Jpj 3.jpg
- File:Pradeesh Abraham @ Office.jpg
- File:Pradeesh Abraham jpj.jpg
- File:Pappa . Sister . Mamma And Me.jpg
- File:Pradeesh Abraham 2.jpg
- File:Pradeesh Abraham 12.jpg
- File:Pradeesh Abraham.jpg
Sreejith K (talk) 22:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
سكس 78.93.70.86 01:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep No reason given. Is this a case of testing or vandalism? --Jarekt (talk) 11:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense nomination Didym (talk) 01:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
unused, useless, no encyclopedic value Frédéric (talk) 19:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per deletion policy: "Was uploaded with the intent to be used solely for purposes of vandalism, personal attacks, and/or spamming."-Aleator (talk) 11:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Attack image; I notified uploader. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:01, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 01:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
permission missing Imagination0010101 (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: permission link gives a valid permission for CC-by-SA 3.0 Didym (talk) 01:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I dont want to display my image anymore Gvenkat5 (talk) 02:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: usually not a reason for deletion, but only used on the uploader's user page, otherwise out of scope Didym (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Véase el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused and noneducational self image Reguyla (talk) 23:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused and noneducational selfie. Commons isn't a photoalbum Reguyla (talk) 23:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Orcakrilozona (talk · contribs)
[edit]Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope / unclear copyright status.
- File:Joseph didonato music album.jpg
- File:859771172610.600x600-75.jpg
- File:DLX Artwork TIG.jpg
- File:Aritst Photo.jpg
- File:Josephdidonato1.jpg
FDMS 4 00:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope, per COM:SELFIE Scoopfinder(d) 00:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The pic is in use, but this editor seems to be more concerned about promoting himself than editing. Strakhov (talk) 10:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope, per COM:SELFIE Scoopfinder(d) 00:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The pic is in use, but this editor seems to be more concerned about promoting himself than editing. Strakhov (talk) 11:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete Per nominator's. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 18:55, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot from a video game, copyright status and scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot from a video game, copyright status and scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot from a video game, copyright status and scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot from a video game, copyright status and scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 00:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot from a video game, copyright status and scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot from a video game, copyright status and scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot from a video game, copyright status and scope unclear. Fry1989 eh? 00:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Véase el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
derivative works of copyrighted material. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 01:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copy of http://fuguchaulnes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/311312_499343866789065_690392375_n.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 01:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Severe questions of COM:SCOPE, copyright. I can't get the sounds to play so I can't 100% verify.
- File:Fight in the world.mid
- File:Alonekjjjj.mid
- File:Alive ma,nik.mid
- File:Go kokol.mid
- File:Princess fuun show yourself.mid
- File:Princess fuun big adventure.mid
- File:Orochimaru-s theme.mid
- File:Need to be strong.mid
- File:Naruto main theme.mid
- File:Naruto 34 - Hinata Vs Neji.mid
- File:Naruto 31 - Konohamarus theme.mid
- File:Naruto 26 - Evil.mid
- File:Naruto 23 - Haruka Kanata.mid
- File:Naruto 22 - Wind.mid
- File:Naruto 18 - Strong and Strike.mid
- File:Naruto 14 - Evening.mid
- File:Naruto 13 - Go go go Naruto.mid
- File:Naruto 10 - Sakuras theme.mid
- File:Naruto 9 - Loneliness.mid
- File:Naruto 8 - Sadness and sorrow.mid
- File:Naruto 7 - The raising fighting spirit.mid
- File:Naruto 4 - Morning.mid
- File:Naruto 2 - I said Im Naruto.mid
- File:Naruto 1 - Rocks.mid
- File:Naruto s daily life.mid
- File:Kanashimi wo yasashisa ni.mid
- File:Its the training.mid
- File:Hokage-s funeral.mid
- File:Happy end.mid
- File:Daylight of Konoha.mid
- File:Bad situation.mid
- File:Avenger.mid
- File:Gba ending theme.mid
- File:Gaara+ep77.mid
- File:Fooling mode.mid
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
The flickr url don´t exist anymore and the Luc Viatour website is copyrighted © Luc Viatour 1993 / 2014 Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
OH, wow, I guess none of you can read french... "La plupart des images sont en Licence libre Creative Common CC-BY-SA.. Renseignez vous avant toute publication pour les quelques exceptions (personnes, créations d'artistes, architecture, etc). La plupart des photos sont disponibles en haute résolution." So check first, if your claim is true, instead of deleting a free image. Catfisheye (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Français : "La plupart des images sont en Licence libre Creative Common CC-BY-SA."English: "Most images are freely License Creative Commons CC-BY-SA.". Catfisheye Improve your french or use google translate. How can we guess what image is freely licensed. Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- My French does not fail that much. The argumentation for deletion was, that all the images on his website are copyrighted, although the mainpage clearly indicated, that the most of them are free. So prove, that the image now has become copyrighted, instead of argueing and deleting without prove. Because the picture had been reviewed here and maybe you know the rule of commons, that says: "It is important to note, though, that once a work has been made available under a given license, the copyright holder cannot legally change or revoke the license on copies of that work. Thus, an image originally licensed as CC-BY and uploaded to Commons under that license (and verified), but later changed on Flickr to All Rights Reserved, may remain on Commons under the CC-BY license." The same applies, if the photographer just deleted his pictures. ----
Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Image with no (meaningful) description. What is this? See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Strakhov (talk) 10:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Strakhov (talk) 10:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. (w:BlueBird Cabs Ltd.) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Strakhov (talk) 10:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, we don't need a project full of selfies. Reguyla (talk) 19:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Strakhov (talk) 10:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, we don't need a project full of selfies. Reguyla (talk) 19:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Strakhov (talk) 10:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, we don't need a project full of selfies. Reguyla (talk) 19:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Upload appears promotional or self-promotional in nature, see description, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Strakhov (talk) 10:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, we don't need a project full of selfies. Reguyla (talk) 19:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
now redundant; original image at File:Centrosome Cycle.svg has embedded text now ♥ Kelvinsong talk 02:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
photo says it is from Quiznos.com, does the user have rights to upload photos from website? Mjrmtg (talk) 02:10, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
If subject (see title) is same as uploader, this isn't a selfie and the real photographer would have to file OTRS, else COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:10, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete a self-timer is a possibility here, but... the image is out of scope and precautionary principle applies, Strakhov (talk) 09:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE: Commons is not a personal photo album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Strakhov (talk) 10:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, we don't need a project full of selfies. Reguyla (talk) 19:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, let's please not bite the newbies, new user, photo of that user, see w:User:Shi-geek. He may want to use the photo on his userpage. -- Cirt (talk) 20:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Still unused a week later, and no further edits from uploader. INeverCry 03:25, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader has left message at my talk page. I have urged him to reply here instead. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, per comment by uploader: "Hi, it't scanned fotoportrait from family archive. I'm son of Michail Bernstein. Nobody other person & never can has copyright for this photo.". -- Cirt (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. This is a professional portrait. Owning a photo doesn't give the uploader copyright of it. INeverCry 03:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
users only upload, photo has adam-lambert.net watermark on it, doubtful ownership Mjrmtg (talk) 02:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:19, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Strakhov (talk) 09:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, we don't need a project full of selfies. Reguyla (talk) 19:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:19, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Strakhov (talk) 09:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, we don't need a project full of selfies. Reguyla (talk) 19:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:19, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Strakhov (talk) 09:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, we don't need a project full of selfies. Reguyla (talk) 19:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:19, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
The band was only active in the 80s (see hair!) and I fail to see how an iPhone could have captured them in 2013 looking unchanged since the 80s. Probable rephotograph of original, would need clarification on source to be retained, else COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, likely took a picture of his own photograph for ease of uploading. -- Cirt (talk) 03:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. This is a photo of an old photo, and we have no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder of the original image. INeverCry 03:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Strakhov (talk) 10:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, we don't need a project full of selfies. Reguyla (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete Per nominator's. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 18:55, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:21, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Strakhov (talk) 10:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, we don't need a project full of selfies. Reguyla (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, we don't need a project full of selfies. Reguyla (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO DW of body shown at "Sir Tom Jones" part of art series Celebrities as Neoclassical Paintings by George Dawe. A different head has been appended to the body painted by Dawe. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Uploader doesn't seem to be the person who created the image. The website sourced is a mix of youtubes, movie clips, reprinted photographs. I see a note a the bottom of the page that claims all content is free, but as I also see copyrighted Hollywood movies in the mix, I am asking for clarification on the source, and author of this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:08, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, website says everything on the site is public domain. In this case we have an image of the subject himself, attributed to be copyright owned by that subject. See statement at bottom of website: "Todos los contenidos son de dominio público.". We can't really get a better license release than "public domain". Thank you! -- Cirt (talk) 20:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment If there wasn't so much copyrighted material on the page, I'd be happy to accept that license. But I don't think the page owner is correct. 18:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ellin Beltz (talk • contribs)
- In this case the copyrighted material released is an image of himself, released to "public domain". -- Cirt (talk) 21:44, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment There is no indication that uploader is Fabian C. Barrio. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom/COM:PRP. INeverCry 03:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The skalpel (talk · contribs)
[edit]promotional photos, out of scope
- File:The skalpel 1.jpg
- File:Скальпель 016.jpg
- File:Скальпель 015.jpg
- File:Скальпель 017.jpg
- File:Скальпель 014.jpg
- File:Скальпель 012.jpg
- File:Скальпель 013.jpg
- File:Скальпель 009.jpg
- File:Скальпель 010.jpg
- File:Скальпель 008.jpg
- File:Скальпель 007.jpg
- File:Скальпель 005.jpg
- File:Скальпель 006.jpg
- File:Скальпель 002.jpg
- File:Скальпель 001.jpg
- File:Скальпель 004.jpg
- File:Скальпель 011.jpg
- File:Скальпель 003.jpg
Mjrmtg (talk) 02:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, useful and educational material, contained in category, Category:Butterflies by country. -- Cirt (talk) 03:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, this chart will be incorporated into the en Wikipedia article on Commercial Butterfly breeding just as soon as I can get to it. How about deleting some of the 100s of redundant Monarch butterfly images....yikes.
Kept: per Bfpage. INeverCry 03:49, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you so much!
Text information only: out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, most helpful contribution by Prosfilaes (talk · contribs). In-scope. Educational and encyclopedic. Contributes to archive of information about Buddy Holly as noted in category Category:Buddy Holly. Thank you! -- Cirt (talk) 03:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep COM:SCOPE says "scanned copies of existing texts that are useful to other WMF projects—e.g. to serve as the basis of a reliable, verifiable source—are in scope".--Prosfilaes (talk) 13:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Now in use: wikisource:en:Aircraft Accident Report for Buddy Holly's crash -Pete F (talk) 18:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, Peteforsyth, your contribution of this to Wikisource is most appreciated. -- Cirt (talk) 20:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- FYI, Thanks to Peteforsyth, now also in use, at d:Q19463353. -- Cirt (talk) 20:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, Peteforsyth, your contribution of this to Wikisource is most appreciated. -- Cirt (talk) 20:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 03:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted content. FDMS 4 02:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:52, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Screenshot, no indication of user's own work and probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:52, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Promotional materials, out of COM:SCOPE and possible COM:COPYVIOs as well. Commons isn't a place to promote a business or product, try Facebook instead.
- File:Building Integrated, transpired solar air heating collector by MatrixAir.png
- File:Close-up of a wall mounted, transpired collector's absorber by Matrix Energy Inc..gif
- File:MatrixAir "TR" transpired solar air heating system.gif
- File:MatrixAir "TR" unglazed solar absorber.jpg
- File:MatrixAir Delta.JPG
- File:MatrixAir solar air heating system at Light Armoured Vehicle Facility, CFB Petawawa, Ontario, Canada.JPG
- File:Modular, roof mounted solar air heating system on a multi-residential rooftop.JPG
- File:Modular, roof mounted, two stage transpired solar air heating collector from MatrixAir.jpg
- File:Modular, roof-mounted MatrixAir Delta Solar Air Heating System.JPG
- File:Transpired solar air heating collector in multi-residential high rise buidling.JPG
- File:Transpired solar air heating collectors on schools.JPG
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously educational and encyclopedic images. Good examples of potential usage illustrating multiple topics including: Solar air heat, Solar collector, and Solar thermal collector. Thank you! -- Cirt (talk) 02:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment These files came to my attention after reading the captions/article at Solar air heat. The pictures were obviously uploaded for promotional purposes else there would be no reason to repeat "Matrix Air" in the file names and in the captions on the solar air heat page. I specifically find these images in use on Copyrighted webpages:
- File:Building Integrated, transpired solar air heating collector by MatrixAir.png - http://www.matrixenergy.ca/solar-air-heating/matrixair-system.html
- File:Close-up of a wall mounted, transpired collector's absorber by Matrix Energy Inc..gif -http://www.matrixenergy.ca/solar-air-heating/matrixair-system.html
- File:MatrixAir Delta.JPG - title shows source of image to be from the Matrix Air company.
- File:Modular, roof mounted, two stage transpired solar air heating collector from MatrixAir.jpg - title shows source of image to be from the Matrix Air company.
- File:Transpired solar air heating collector in multi-residential high rise buidling.JPG - https://www.energysage.com/project/6750/solar-air-heating-for-multi-residential-buildings/ click on image to see much larger original version
- File:Modular, roof-mounted MatrixAir Delta Solar Air Heating System.JPG - title shows source of image to be from the Matrix Air company.
- File:MatrixAir "TR" transpired solar air heating system.gif - DW of File:Building Integrated, transpired solar air heating collector by MatrixAir.png
- Matrix Air website [1] is marked "All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2009 – 2015 EnergySage, page marked "© Copyright 2013 Matrix Air Heating Inc. All Rights Reserved."
- It is very likely these images were uploaded for promotional purposes: (a) name of uploader is name of company being promoted (b) captions on en:w show intent (c) as many images as I checked came from their website.
- The Canon Powershot pictures are likely the work of some individual and may be able to be solved by an OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- ((vd}} While I agree with Cirt that these could be useful images, the fact that they come from a (C) ARR web site makes it impossible for us to keep them here without a free license. That will have to come via OTRS from an authorized officer of Matrix Air Heating Inc. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Jim. INeverCry 03:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
нарушение АП (с сайта http://kizeeva.com/) kosun (talk) 05:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Restored per ticket:2015031710030223 Natuur12 (talk) 10:57, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
нарушение АП (с сайта http://kizeeva.com/) kosun (talk) 05:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Restored per ticket:2015031710030223 Natuur12 (talk) 10:52, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
нарушение АП (с сайта http://kizeeva.com/) kosun (talk) 05:08, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
One poor quality image of uncertain location and uncertain provenence and 16 images of coloured text that are not within scope of Commons.
- File:PottersField.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-01.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels.pdf
- File:Color coding for parallel.JPG
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-e.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-d.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-c.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-b.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-a.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-6.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-5.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-4.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-3.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-2.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-1.png
- File:Mattthew 27 Parallels-0.png
Alan Liefting (talk) 05:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused image of a non-notable social event. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 06:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per Didym, Strakhov (talk) 09:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Self-promotion - used in a deleted article en:Pika Browser (web browser based on a sample app of the Pika platform - see en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pika Browser). Possibly unfree. Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sisagester (talk · contribs)
[edit]probably copyright violation, unlikely to be own work, available on various sites without indication of free license
- File:HXB1500-asphalt-mixing-plant.jpg
- File:HXB2000-asphalt-mixing-plant.jpg
- File:Asphalt-batch-mix-plants.jpg
- File:Asphalt-plants-for-road.jpg
Didym (talk) 06:34, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I have some doupts that this is witin the commons:scope. Sanandros (talk) 07:10, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational purpose, out of scope. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete delete per Jianhui67, Strakhov (talk) 09:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Duplication of content at File:15S 2015 track.png Keith Edkins (talk) 08:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Very low quality, hard to determine what the photo is showing Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per Gbawden, Strakhov (talk) 09:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
It's 2009-April dated, we have a 2009-February-dated-version with better quality this one, copyright violation or not the file is not needed. Strakhov (talk) 08:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete Copyright violation. The one uploaded by Strakhov seems to be the original one, and with much more resolution. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 19:00, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of art not covered by Spanish FOP exception, since it is not permanent stuff. I think "de minimis" does not apply, Strakhov (talk) 10:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete Per nominator's. See the source image --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 18:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 10:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio http://russ-krasota.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=63&Itemid=91 Petrov Victor (talk) 10:22, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Test picture Brateevsky {talk} 10:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Test picture Brateevsky {talk} 10:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work, considering an official symbol of a faculty of a Brazilian university. Per logs this is the 4th reupload by user: All previous uploads were deleted per missing permission. Permission and/or further details needed. The symbol may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 11:52, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 11:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Inferior unused duplicate of File:Flagge Hochtaunuskreis.png ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 11:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MelAlves098 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not used out of scope media.
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Small resolution image with no EXIF data. Author mentionned the same as the image subject — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused inferior duplicate of File:Centarus sirrus.svg. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 12:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The version before was 45 × 25 (1 KB)--Kopiersperre (talk) 12:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Inferior unused duplicate of File:Flagge Main-Taunus-Kreis.png. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 12:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Inferior unused duplicate of File:Flagge Landkreis Offenbach.png. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 12:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely cropped & resized & watermark removed from a historic version of (example) http://www.pontagrossa.pr.gov.br/colegio-regente-feijo = http://www.pontagrossa.pr.gov.br/files/fotos/12_colegio_regente_feijo.jpg Gunnex (talk) 12:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anscharius (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 13:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nvargaspicapau (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Nvargaspicapau, the huge log of deleted files, including multiple personalities like author = "nvargas" (= himself?), "CORNELIO", "UTFPR", "PREFEITURA" etc. and the mass DR Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Nvargaspicapau, indicating also to multiple personalities and digicams in use. All files were uploaded only after the mass DR and reveal the same problems: multiple authors and exif
- File:Cipeca02 edited.jpg
- File:Cipeca01 edited.jpg
- File:Utfpcampuscornelio5.jpg
- File:Utfprcampuscornelio4.JPG
- File:Utfprcampuscornelio3.JPG
- File:Utfprcampuscornelio2.JPG
- File:Utfprcampuscornelio.jpg
- File:Prefeitura cornelio.jpg
- File:InauguracaoCIPECA.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, the information provided by the uploader is insufficient to find or verify the sources. Some files can be found by searching, for example File:Cipeca01 edited.jpg (source: UTFPR) is taken from http://paginapessoal.utfpr.edu.br/avargas/laboratory-of-automatic-control-systems. The source is not freely licensed. Same applies to other uploads. --Martin H. (talk) 20:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 13:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 13:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 13:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 13:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Thomas1313 (talk) 13:34, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement : the owner of the artwork has requested that the photograph be deleted. Thomas1313 (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement : the owner of the artwork has requested that the photograph be deleted. Thomas1313 (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement : the owner of the artwork has requested that the photograph be deleted. Thomas1313 (talk) 13:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement : the owner of the artwork has requested that the photograph be deleted. Thomas1313 (talk) 13:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement : the owner of the artwork has requested that the photograph be deleted. Thomas1313 (talk) 13:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement : the owner of the artwork has requested that the photograph be deleted. Thomas1313 (talk) 13:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement : the owner of the artwork has requested that the photograph be deleted. Thomas1313 (talk) 13:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement : the owner of the artwork has requested that the photograph be deleted. Thomas1313 (talk) 13:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement : the owner of the artwork has requested that the photograph be deleted. Thomas1313 (talk) 13:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement : the owner of the artwork has requested that the photograph be deleted. Thomas1313 (talk) 13:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement : the owner of the artwork has requested that the photograph be deleted. Thomas1313 (talk) 13:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Self-promo,see w:fr:Discussion utilisateur:Mediateurscientifique. Juggler2005 (talk) 14:02, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sorbonniere89 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos with unclear copyright status.
- File:Spinzar Cotton Company.jpg
- File:Sarwar Nasher Khan and Prince Philip of England.jpg
- File:Sarwar Nasher Khan in exile.jpg
- File:Sarwar Nasher Khan in Ghazni.jpg
- File:King Zahir (right) and Lord Nasher.jpg
Juggler2005 (talk) 14:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Promo/self-promo, see w:es:Usuario discusión:Transparente La Isla Sagrada. Juggler2005 (talk) 14:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete – per nomination. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 20:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Missing an educational content. Out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 14:15, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:20, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 04:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Not needed low resolution crop from ISS-42 EVA-3 (l) Terry Virts.jpg. Ras67 (talk) 15:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Modern photo of 3D object. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Planchamagnetica (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Ocaso Estepario.JPG
- File:Sin titulito nada.JPG
- File:Evo Morales 2008.JPG
- File:Woman pronto.JPG
- File:Pieza única muda.JPG
- File:Trasmundo vitroleo.JPG
- File:Amor sepulcral.JPG
- File:Siguiente Navaja Diablada.JPG
- File:Challa de San Francisco Alcholatum.JPG
- File:Los borrachos OH! menaje a Velazquez.JPG
- File:Pastillas neo comander.JPG
- File:Agosto alax pacha.JPG
- File:Cristo Estudio.JPG
- File:Mural new year.JPG
- File:Analogia goya.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Pico Moyano - Iceberg del Sur.jpg
- File:Iceberg del Sur - Video Clip Paula.jpg
- File:Pepe2.jpg
- File:Pico Moyano - Sesión de Fotos 2014.jpg
- File:Pepe Moyano en sesión de fotos de Todo es Posible - Iceberg del Sur.jpg
- File:Agustín Moyano tocando en la Fiesta de la Primavera (2013).jpg
- File:Agustín Moyano - Sesión de fotos Todo es Posible.jpg
- File:Iceberg del Sur - Reportaje Gonzalito Personal Fest 2015.jpg
- File:Iceberg del Sur - Personal 2015.jpg
- File:Iceberg del Sur - Personal Fest (2015).jpg
- File:Iceberg del Sur - Todo es Posible 1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Goldmanjordan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. One photo is Commons:Derivative work from advertisement.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Posters. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Jual rumah minimalis idaman keluarga.png
- File:Rumah minimalis masa kini.jpg
- File:Desain Rumah Minimalis.png
- File:Desain Rumah Minimalis Terbaru 2015.jpg
- File:Desain Rumah Ideal Minimalis dan Modern Untuk Keluarga Kecil.jpg
- File:Tipe Rumah Minimalis Paling Populer.jpg
- File:Rumah Minimalis Paling Diminati.jpg
- File:Jual Rumah Idaman Bandung.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. This photo appears to be an indoor shot derivated from an artwork by (as indicated) living Brazilian artist Beatriz Balen Susin and may not be covered by COM:FOP#Brazil, considering the "?" entry for public interiors at the summary table via COM:FOP#Situation in different countries. Additional, it is unclear if this artwork is permanently located at the location or only was installed for a temporary exhibition. Gunnex (talk) 16:10, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VictorAnyakin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative work from a non permanent exhibition
- File:Example of Russian propaganda at exhibition «Presence» (2).jpg
- File:List of Russian units that operated in east Ukraine as compiled by InformNapalm and UAcrisis.jpg
- File:T-64BV tank searchlight 9 annotation at the exhibition «Presence».jpg
- File:Smerch rocket fragments from Kramatorsk annotation at exhibition «Presence».jpg
- File:NSV «Utyos» machine gun on 6T7 mount annotation at exhibition «Presence».jpg
- File:Granat-4 drone annotation at exhibition «Presence».jpg
- File:Example of Russian propaganda at exhibition «Presence» (3).jpg
- File:Documents, awards, insignia, russian personnel id tags at exhibition «Presence».jpg
- File:ZIL-131 vehicle annotation at exhibition «Presence».jpg
- File:RPO «Shmel» annotation at exhibition «Presence».jpg
- File:Example of Russian propaganda at exhibition «Presence» (4).jpg
- File:Example of Russian propaganda at exhibition «Presence» (1).jpg
- File:BMD-2 annotation at exhibition «Presence».jpg
- File:BM-21 Grad of the 18 motor brigade annotation at the exhibition «Presence».jpg
- File:BTR-80 hull annotation at exhibition «Presence».jpg
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- As far as understand russian propaganda is considered to be a work of art protected by copyright. If it is true, I don't see what arguments can prevent deletion of these photos from Commons.
- If you believe that annotations violate copyright, I still have them stored and will try to convert into textual descriptions as far as possible. Of course, it is kind of unfortunate as sometimes people ask what is the source of information in photo description. With best regards--vityok (talk) 21:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Taken from here. Copyright status unknown Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Same as with Commons:Deletion requests/File:HEROILMA foto 1 edited-1 945 1417.jpg Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Derivative works of insignia. No information provided to determine copyright status.
- File:Compagnie Administration Service.jpg
- File:InsigneCAS.gif
- File:Insigne 5eme Cie.gif
- File:Insigne ccl.jpg
- File:42eme Régiment de Transmissions.jpg
- File:7eme Cie.jpg
- File:5eme Cie.jpg
- File:4eme Cie.jpg
- File:2eme Cie.jpg
- File:1ere Cie.jpg
- File:Insigne de la 1ere Armée.jpg
- File:Compagnie808-petit.jpg
- File:807-cie-trans.jpg
- File:Insigne FFA.jpg
- File:Ancien insigne du 18 rt.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 21:05, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
User:Oursmili 11:50, 8 August 2014 ( UTC). Je voudrais savoir pourquoi vous les supprimer, Il s'agit d'un travail personnel en vue d'améliorer une page wikipédia. Information about copyright was add on
Deleted: The descriptions assert that these are PD without giving any reason. It is possible that they are PD-old, but without information explaining that, they cannot be kept. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- This file was my work and it's my photography of my collection who is the problem ?? Oursmili (talk) 09:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- De plus tous les insignes sont {{PD-old}}
Après je vois pas ? Oursmili (talk) 10:15, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- I encorauge you to read COM:DW. All of your photographs are derivate works. If the works are in the public domain, right, no problem. Otherwise, original copyright remains. Some of the original picture could be regarded as ineligible (being too simple to be copyrighted) but, in general, you must provide a public-domain rationale for each of them. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 10:57, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete First, I doubt that any of these are PD-Old. That would require that the designer has been dead for 70 years. Generally, we do not assume PD-Old unless the work is from before 1885.
- Second, despite Oursmili's assertion that they are his own photography, all of those I have looked at are very small images -- less than 200px on each side. That is not typical for "own work". Of course, Oursmili can easily prove that they are his work by uploading new versions at camera resolution on top of these. If he cannot do that, then I must believe they are someone else's photography. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- From a brief look at a couple of the small photos, I think it’s just as likely that they were cropped out of a larger shot of an entire display or set, therefore still at original resolution. (I haven’t examined them closely enough to see evidence of sensor noise on the one hand, or resampling on the other, but low resolution is not uncommon for images of this kind—especially if the photographer doesn’t have macro lenses or adequate lighting for ECUs.)—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:24, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- I encorauge you to read COM:DW. All of your photographs are derivate works. If the works are in the public domain, right, no problem. Otherwise, original copyright remains. Some of the original picture could be regarded as ineligible (being too simple to be copyrighted) but, in general, you must provide a public-domain rationale for each of them. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 10:57, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Bonjour messieurs :
Lien d'explication.
Oursmili (talk) 16:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, i will test to explain to you in english : the french insignia of military units have there right transferred to the units and this right felt in the public domaine 70 years after the first publications. Is it good, for you a part of my insignia was on public domain and the insignia of new units (GSBdD for example ) can't be on commons but can be on wikipédia in terms of the French logos PDD. I hope you understand. If you know how i can put this on this image. Thanks Oursmili (talk) 18:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete For the sake of argument, let's say the insignia are in the public domain. Even then, they are 3D objects which means the photographs themselves are eligible for copyright. These photographs appear to be copyvios stolen from www.compagnie-des-uniformes.com. All are low (web) resolution - File:Bras-musique-materiel.jpg is here; File:Bras-chasseur-afrique-ssoff.jpg is here; etc. See also my comments about this user's already deleted images. Эlcobbola talk 18:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Elcobbola. INeverCry 04:24, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Is it in the public domain? Why? Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, see watermarks. Permission needed.
Sealle (talk) 16:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:03, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Prt Sc screenshot from here; notice image label from hovering mouse on right. Эlcobbola talk 17:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Clearly not uploader's own work; many/all appear to be screenshots from online videos or websites. For example, File:Leysya pesnya 1.JPG is from here, File:Danspataru1.JPG is here, etc.. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jindřich Krejča.JPG where uploader used "prt sc" to upload a copyvio.
- File:Бурёнка из Маслёнкино.JPG
- File:Leysya pesnya 1.JPG
- File:Duel (Rumunská televízia).JPG
- File:Anatoma1.JPG
- File:Aurelianandreescu1.JPG
- File:Andacalugareanu2.JPG
- File:Danspataru2.JPG
- File:Danspataru1.JPG
- File:Andacalugareanu1.JPG
Эlcobbola talk 17:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
The project has sufficient images of this type without extras. The categories Frenulum piercing and Foreskin contain may better photos of this same topic.
- File:Piercing frenulum.JPG
- File:Circumcision simulated.JPG
- File:Prepuce1.JPG
- File:Prepuce2.JPG
- File:My frenulum removed.JPG
- File:My Scrotum.JPG
- File:Foreskin long.JPG
Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 08:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Эlcobbola talk 17:52, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 04:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BanglarPitha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bulk copyvio upload; images appear to have been taken from various internet sites and watermarked to promote BanglarPitha (see image summaries); File:Teler pitha.jpg is here; File:Patisapta,.jpg is here; File:Chitoi Pitha.jpg is here; etc.
- File:Pitha 1.jpg
- File:Love Pitha.jpg
- File:Vapa puli.jpg
- File:Teler pitha.jpg
- File:Dudh Chitoi Pitha.jpg
- File:Patisapta,.jpg
- File:Pata Pitha.jpg
- File:Nokhsi golap.jpg
- File:Fuljhuri Pitha.jpg
- File:Dudh Puli Pitha.jpg
- File:Dimer Pitha.jpg
- File:BanglarPitha logo.png
- File:Chitoi Pitha.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 18:19, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Tiny duplicate of File:Flag of Spain.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Low res, no camera EXIF, all other user uploads are copyvios; appeared here in April 2014 (uploaded to Commons January 2015); quack. Эlcobbola talk 18:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marcosas12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works - scans of publications; no information provided to determine copyright status. Even if somehow free, most out of scope per Commons:Project_scope#Excluded_educational_content.
- File:Oberdan 15.jpg
- File:Oberdan 16.jpg
- File:Oberdan 14.jpg
- File:Oberdan 13.jpg
- File:Oberdan 12.jpg
- File:Oberdan 9.jpg
- File:Oberdan 8.jpg
- File:Oberdan 7.jpg
- File:Oberdan 6.jpg
- File:Oberdan 3.jpg
- File:Oberdan 19.jpg
- File:Oberdan 5.jpg
- File:Oberdan 4.jpg
- File:Folleto 56.jpg
- File:Oberdan 2.jpg
- File:Oberdan 1.jpg
- File:Folleto 88.jpg
- File:Folleto 79.jpg
- File:Folleto 66.jpg
- File:Folleto 43.jpg
- File:Folleto 34.jpg
- File:Folleto 50.jpg
- File:Folleto 55.jpg
- File:Folleto 78.jpg
- File:Folleto 67.jpg
- File:Folleto 29.jpg
- File:Folleto 25.jpg
- File:Folleto 240.jpg
- File:Folleto 23.jpg
- File:Folleto 24.jpg
- File:Folleto 209.jpg
- File:Folleto 22.jpg
- File:Folleto 21.jpg
- File:Folleto 20.jpg
- File:Folleto 18.jpg
- File:Folleto 17.jpg
- File:Folleto 16.jpg
- File:Folleto 15.jpg
- File:Folleto 13.jpg
- File:Folleto 12.jpg
- File:Folleto 11.jpg
- File:Folleto 10.jpg
- File:Folleto 6666.jpg
- File:Folleto 9.jpg
- File:Folleto 7.jpg
- File:Folleto 6.jpg
- File:Folleto 5.jpg
- File:Folleto 1.jpg
- File:Folleto 4.jpg
- File:Folleto 3.jpg
- File:Folleto 2.jpg
- File:Folleto 8.jpg
- File:Op 4.jpg
- File:Op 9.jpg
- File:Op 6.jpg
- File:Op 8.jpg
- File:Op 5.jpg
- File:Op 7.jpg
- File:Oberdan Paterlini.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
SVG available as File:Flag of Mexico with Silver Arms.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
completely redundant to identical SVG version File:NEOS – Das Neue Österreich logo.svg PanchoS (talk) 19:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Please delete this file for 2 reasons: 1.Stracture in this is for 1-buten-2-amine and not for 1-Propen-2-amine. 2. I uploaded the correct stracture to file:1-propen-2-amine.svg.
--Vchorozopoulos (talk) 19:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Photograph of signature by artist who died in 1997. Cannot be PD due to age. Although signature itself is PD-ineligible, the painting over which the signature was written is clearly and prominently visible. Эlcobbola talk 18:34, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
advertisement/spam Sebari (talk) 19:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
advertisement Sebari (talk) 19:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- DeleteConcur with submitter. Out of scope. Reguyla (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:33, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
unsharp blurry photo without encyclopedic value — Draceane diskuse 11:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Indeed. Delete.--Juandev (talk) 16:10, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Concur with submitter. Out of scope. Reguyla (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted logo from https://www.facebook.com/WroclawDlaJezusa Pnapora (talk) 21:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prefeitura de timon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Timon which were created (per http://vejatimon.com/brasao-cidade-timon-maranhao/) by municipal law Lei Municipal n° 1936 in 12.2014. Permission from (someone of) http://www.timon.ma.gov.br/ (official site) needed.
Gunnex (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. The logo, at least, was previously published here. Huon (talk) 21:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright claim in metadata WQUlrich (talk) 21:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Looks like this picture is a printscreen from a video, of which the copyright is owned by the broadcaster -Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 17:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 22:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This football logo from Colombia is not likely to be available under a free license, its source http://www.leonesfc.co has no copyright declaration but should obviously be assumed to be copyrighted seb26 (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 22:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
According to Daily Mail (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2783455/American-fighter-joins-Kurds-battle-against-Islamic-State.html) there is a copyright: (c) facebook.com/jordan.matson.3 89.182.92.19 22:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
According to Daily Mail (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2783455/American-fighter-joins-Kurds-battle-against-Islamic-State.html) there is a copyright by Reuters existing Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 22:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 04:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files by User:Stefania panzera
[edit]Stefania panzera (talk · contribs)
- Image:Pic04.jpg
- Image:0,2299,OID2377550,00.jpg
- Image:72689regh58.jpg
- Image:Srystftuftuftuiftu.jpg
- Image:RSchenker4.jpg
Alls files by User:Stefania panzera are suspected copyvios. All self claimed, with inappropriate file names, without a date and description where the images was made. I have identified six files as clear copyvios. --GeorgHH • talk 14:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Looks like a sockpuppet: identical files was uploaded by User:Riccardo il rocker
- Image:1986-BRAVO-gth05.jpg - Image:1986-BRAVO-05.jpg
- Image:RSchenker4.jpg - Image:RSchenker.jpg
- Image:Vlcsnap-83695.png --GeorgHH • talk 14:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: Files have apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Missing source.
- File:1881 Occupation of the People in the Parish of Mapleton.jpg
- File:2011 Occupation of the parish of Mapleton.jpg
- File:@Pinenipplenouis and Harry Styles have a love baby named Michael Clifford 2013-11-18 21-52.jpg
- File:AhmadJawad in captions.jpeg
- File:April Watts.jpg
- File:Autógrafo Merche.png
- File:Batalla del 19 de Marzo.jpg
- File:Beatae Virgo Mariae Immaculata Conceptio sub Washingtonensis Foedetae Americae.jpg
- File:Beuninho e davi 2014-03-30 02-13.jpg
- File:Bru avi 2014-03-30 02-15.jpg
- File:Bruninho & davi 2014-03-30 02-14.png
- File:Bruninho e davi 2014-03-30 15-16.png
- File:Dimitri Tavadze.jpg
- File:Echelelte de Sentier Vicinal.JPG
- File:Fb logo.jpg
- File:Gregorio Luperon.JPG
- File:Juan Suero.jpg
- File:Julian Besteiro4.jpg
- File:Laurel and Hardy! 2014-03-30 00-02.gif
- File:Linie U4 Berlin.gif
- File:Linie U7 Berlin.gif
- File:MailiKohan california.jpg
- File:Mib brudav 2014-03-30 02-16.jpg
- File:Monumento caduti.jpg
- File:Phung-The-Tai.jpg
- File:Phùng thế tài.jpg
- File:PROPOSED MRT CORRIDOR.jpg
- File:Stemma de Luna d'Aragona.jpg
- File:Taylor swift 2014-03-30 19-55.jpg
- File:Total Population of Mapleton Civil Parish from 1801 to 2011..jpg
- File:Tulio Cestero.JPG
- File:Бодаренко Татьяна Андреевна 2014-03-30 23-53.jpg
- File:پوستر.jpg
- File:立浪さん.png
- File:겨울이색썰매-이색 겨울자전거스키-이색놀이기구제작-이색썰매제작-이색자전거제작--www-igreenxx-com-www-igreenbike-com 2013-10-24 23-31.jpg
- File:이색자전거-이색놀이기구제작-이색자전거체험-이색썰매-이색스포츠-별난자전거-www-igreenxx-com-www-igreenbike-com 2013-10-24 23-39.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Files have apparently been deleted (except one) Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files of User:Prabhu Prasad Tripathy
[edit]- File:Biju-Patnaik.jpg
- File:Aparajita.jpg
- File:Aprajita Mohanty.jpg
- File:Uttam.jpg
- File:Young Uttam.jpg
- File:Uttam Mohanty456.jpg
- File:Uttam in film.jpg
- File:Uttam Mohanty123.jpg
- File:Uttam-Aparajita-Babusan.jpg
copyrvio issue by new user, copied (unintentionally due to ignorance?)from : http://www.fullorissa.com/ and other websites watermark name of copyholders exists on images. --Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 02:42, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Files have apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files of User:Puterinusa
[edit]- File:Puterindonesia1992.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia1994.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia1995.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia1996.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia2000.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia2001.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia2002.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia2003.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia2004.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia2005.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia2006.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia2007.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia2008.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia2009.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia2010.jpg
- File:Puterindonesia2011.jpg
All the images are most likely to have been copied from Puteri Indonesia website, the national pageant of Indonesia. --GrayFullbuster (talk) 02:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Files have apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrey Zhivotov (out of project scope)
[edit]Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Andrey Zhivotov
Not used painting by Andrey Zhivotov's daughter. Self-promotion, out of project scope.
Kobac (talk) 07:53, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Not used logos of Andrey Zhivotov's companies. Self-promotion, out of project scope.
Kobac (talk) 07:54, 16 March 2012 (UTC) --Geagea (talk) 14:19, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Files have apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. Possible self-promotion.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Files have apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio music artwork
- File:FF 19b.jpg
- File:FF 19a.jpg
- File:FF 18b.jpg
- File:FF 18a.jpg
- File:FF 17b.jpg
- File:FF 16a.jpg
- File:FF 17a.jpg
- File:FF 16b.jpg
- File:FF 15b.jpg
- File:FF 15a.jpg
- File:FF 15j b.jpg
- File:FF 14b.jpg
- File:FF 15j a.jpg
- File:FF 14a.jpg
- File:FF 13b.jpg
- File:FF 13a.jpg
- File:FF 12b.jpg
- File:FF 12a.jpg
- File:F 11a.jpg
- File:F11 b.jpg
- File:FF 10b.jpg
- File:FF 10a.jpg
- File:FF 10j b.jpg
- File:FF 10j a.jpg
- File:FF 9b.jpg
- File:FF 9a.jpg
- File:FF 8b.jpg
- File:FF 8a.jpg
- File:FF 7a.jpg
- File:FF 7b.jpg
- File:FF 6b.jpg
- File:FF 5b.jpg
- File:FF 6a.jpg
- File:FF 5a.jpg
- File:FF 4b.jpg
- File:FF 4a.jpg
- File:FF 3b.jpg
- File:FF 3a.jpg
- File:FF 2b.jpg
- File:FF 2a.jpg
- File:FF 1b.jpg
- File:FF 1a.jpg
—Blurred Lines 15:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Files have apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:Photosskrs.png
- File:Photo rscny11111.png
- File:Photocnyrs.png
- File:Photo rs ds.jpg
- File:Photorspm.jpg
- File:Teamphoto059172006.jpg
- File:PhotoBL.png
INeverCry 00:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete A load of (c)vios already deleted. Reasonable doubt about own work claim of these files. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thunder Martinez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Mass deletion of files added by User:Visosil - all files grabbed from Internet
- File:Mskaa.jpg
- File:Salaaa.jpg
- File:Isjokmls.jpg
- File:Ksama.jpg
- File:Dmkw.jpg
- File:Smkaaa.jpg
- File:Olqq.jpg
- File:Diwkl.jpg
- File:2003 Campeao.jpg
- File:Skkos.png
- File:Sks.jpg
- File:Nkssa.jpg
- File:Smksa.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 16:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Batch error. Tagged with copyvio. Gunnex (talk) 16:23, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Files have apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zoheirbagherzadeh (talk · contribs)
[edit](c) Mahtaab [2]
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Files have apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded from www.ailesaadeti.tv
[edit]- File:Ailesaadeti eleni.png
- File:Ailesaadeti mahir.png
- File:Ailesaadeti nazlı.png
- File:Ailesaadeti paşababa.png
- File:Ailesaadeti binnazhala.png
- File:Ailesaadeti şevketenişte.png
- File:Ailesaadeti lamia.png
- File:Ailesaadeti mustafa.png
- File:Ailesaadeti belkıs.png
- File:Ailesaadeti hulki.png
- File:Ailesaadeti fitnat.png
- File:Ailesaadeti didar.png
- File:Ailesaadeti pertev.png
- File:Ailesaadeti marika.png
- File:Ailesaadeti tulumbacıhüsnü.png
- File:Ailesaadeti bohçavımelahat.png
- File:Ailesaadeti küçükselim.png
- File:Ailesaadeti despina.png
Request filed by: User:Fcn at 02:00, on 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- please delete--Motopark (talk) 13:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: Files have apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Hasar logos
[edit]Not a relevant company. The logos seem to be uploaded only for advertisement purpose. no WP pages related with those files. Out of project scope. Fma12 (talk) 04:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- File:297 image-HasarConsultoria.jpg
- File:C_Hasar.jpg
- File:Compañia-hasar.jpg
- File:Grupo-hasar-logo.jpg
- File:H_Chile.jpg
- File:H_Paraguay.jpg
- File:H_Servicios.jpg
- File:Hasar_Servicios.jpg
- File:Hasar_Sistemas.jpg
- File:Hasar-mexico-hasar-mexico-371189-F70.gif
Deleted: Files have apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
nonexsisting name Uleli (talk) 18:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
no files --Uleli (talk) 20:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: Apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Hiiaxi on Picasa
[edit]Picasa user Hiiaxi is not the copyright holder of this files but someome who is uploading random webpix to Picasa. Maybe someone abusing Picasa as a webhost for files he wants to post in forums etc. related to his playing of an online soccer simulation in 2009, see https://picasaweb.google.com/hiiaxi.film.arsiv/Transfer2009?noredirect=1. --Martin H. (talk) 16:00, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
--Martin H. (talk) 16:00, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Takabeg (talk) 15:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Files have apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/How to contact with Head Office by E.mail
Please delete this site because there are no photos available during a wrong identification. --Ak ccm (talk) 06:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
no copyright Nardoleo (talk) 09:41, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
no copyright Nardoleo (talk) 09:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
no copyright Nardoleo (talk) 09:38, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
no copyright Nardoleo (talk) 09:46, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
no copright Nardoleo (talk) 09:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
no copyright Nardoleo (talk) 09:44, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
no copyright Nardoleo (talk) 09:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This image was published to a chinese magazine before uploaded to here. Sysywjel (talk) 18:10, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation 196.12.216.23 10:51, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
I am the creator of this file and need it removed for security reasons. Futuremansd (talk) 10:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Empty file, corrupt Radiant chains (talk) 09:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This file had been previously nominated for speedy deletion, but it is not a copyright violation.
- I'm not sure that we must delete this caricature. I'll join it to our new publication of RAW and we'll see. - Simon Villeneuve 11:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Simon, que représente cette image qu'il soit pertinent de garder sur Wikipédia ? Une caricature faite par un auteur précis, et donc digne d'être conservée ? Ou simplement un dessin qui peut représenter n'importe quoi, et qui n'a donc aucune utilisation possible, ni aucun caractère original ?--Sammyday (talk) 18:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Simon Villeneuve et Sammyday : Àmha, une conservation ne serait pas une mauvaise chose puisque cette image est sous license libre sur Flickr [3]. Le problème est que l'utilisateur Hibourassa prétend qu'il s'agit de son travail personnel. --Super Bazooka (talk) 19:26, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Sammyday : Je ne sais pas s'il y a un endroit sur Wikipédia (autre que dans les RAW) où l'image peut-être utilisée, mais je crois qu'elle est pertinente sur Commons. On peut ainsi souligner, notamment, que le poids de M. Barrette est un sujet de discussion récurrent dans les médias québécois et que cette caricature souligne ce trait.
J'aimerais bien garder l'image, ne serait-ce que pour les RAW, mais bon, je n'en ferai pas une croisade. - Simon Villeneuve 01:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)- J'ai ramené avec les bons paramètres. - Simon Villeneuve 01:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Sammyday : Je ne sais pas s'il y a un endroit sur Wikipédia (autre que dans les RAW) où l'image peut-être utilisée, mais je crois qu'elle est pertinente sur Commons. On peut ainsi souligner, notamment, que le poids de M. Barrette est un sujet de discussion récurrent dans les médias québécois et que cette caricature souligne ce trait.
- Simon Villeneuve et Sammyday : Àmha, une conservation ne serait pas une mauvaise chose puisque cette image est sous license libre sur Flickr [3]. Le problème est que l'utilisateur Hibourassa prétend qu'il s'agit de son travail personnel. --Super Bazooka (talk) 19:26, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Simon, que représente cette image qu'il soit pertinent de garder sur Wikipédia ? Une caricature faite par un auteur précis, et donc digne d'être conservée ? Ou simplement un dessin qui peut représenter n'importe quoi, et qui n'a donc aucune utilisation possible, ni aucun caractère original ?--Sammyday (talk) 18:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Offensive. Encourages violence against women 41.157.10.72 08:59, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Commons is not censored. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 12:14, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Per COM:INUSE and COM:CENSOR. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per above Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Está editado incorrectamente Jhose1 (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
{{subst:delete2|image=File:Galaxy Y Pro.jpg|reason=THis is not a work of the brazilian goverment, its copyrighted to Samsung... Ther Terms of Use states that "Unless otherwise stated, the copyright, trademarks, database rights and other intellectual property rights in all content and material on the Website (including without limitation photographs and graphical images) are proprietary rights owned by the Company or its licensors. For the purposes of these Terms, any use of extracts from the Website other than in accordance with clause 2.1 for any purpose is prohibited. If you breach any of these Terms, your permission to use the Website automatically terminates and you must immediately destroy any downloaded or printed extracts from the Website.
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Lacks Permission Oirat (talk) 03:34, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This image is copyrighted. Source Amarhgil (talk) 14:51, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio Jtir (talk) 13:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- HOLLYWOOD - OCTOBER 26: Gary Oldman and Winona Ryder attend an In-House Garden Screening of 'All About Eve' Presented by Martin + Osa and hosted by Kate Beckinsale in support of FilmAid at the Chateau Marmont on October 26, 2008 in Hollywood, California. (Photo by John M. Heller/Getty Images)
- --Jtir (talk) 13:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Soy el propietario de la foto y ya no quiero que esté en Commons --
George Miquilena 18:47, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
does already exist, see File:Ship to Gaza by Latuff.gif Kimdime (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
fake information UPMASSCOM (talk) 06:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vituzzu as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: no educational purpose, pict with unknown copyright status uploaded for a completely not relevant page Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:22, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Privacy reasons Uazikoff (talk) 22:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
privacy reasons Uazikoff (talk) 15:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vituzzu as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: no educational purpose, pict with unknown copyright status uploaded for a completely not relevant page Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:22, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified by User:Takabeg was:
- Copyvio. --Sreejith K (talk) 09:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified by User:Takabeg was:
- Copyvio. --Sreejith K (talk) 09:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Creating missing Sub-page. Original reason specified by User:Takabeg was:
- Copyvio. --Sreejith K (talk) 09:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Quality and version not great (superseeded by File:Geological time spiral.png). This file was uploaded by me a few hours ago. Mwtoews (talk) 23:18, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
suspected copyright violation 84.56.218.141 12:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Published on a free resource. All need to do - delete watermark in the photoshop. --85.141.122.98 07:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's absolutely essential part of the article, illustrating an event not captured in a free-source pictures. This picture is small, low-res and can not replace the quality of the original.FeelSunny (talk) 08:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: Thats not helpful comments: The image must be free because the holder of copyrights released some of his rights - not because any source published the image. The image is used in an article is also totaly unrelated to copyrights. I say Delete, in coherence with my deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/Template:RU-MID - this image is listed there too. --Martin H. (talk) 11:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: p.s.: The russian Wikipedia accepts "fair use", commons does NOT! Maybe this is the source of Sunnys misunderstanding? --Martin H. (talk) 11:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: It should be noted that this file also appears on http://patdollard.com/2008/08/war-breaking-russia-bombs-georgia-as-georgia-attacks-russian-backed-province/, where it is credited to APTN. --Xeeron (talk) 11:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot of a film. Derivative work. BrokenSphere 17:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
its not from 117.200.1.52 12:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
user 'no longer' wishes to share image, not in use by an articles. 173.33.181.66 23:23, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
user no longer wishes to share file, image not used in any article. 173.33.181.66 23:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
user no longer wishes to share image and no in use by any article. 173.33.181.66 23:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
incorect location Minerpen (talk) 12:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Tagged as non-free on Wikipedia by uploader. McMarcoP does not assert that he holds the copyright! Papa November (talk) 23:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- I do indeed not hold the copyright, as it is a logo of an association. I tagged it as a non-free logo under the "Non-free media use rationale" to indicate and represent the association described in the The Ghost Club article, as there is no free equivalent and its use is intended only to help identifying the association in the article. Please let me know what I can do about it. McMarcoP (talk) 11:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- The file is safely hosted on English Wikipedia (same filename) and there's no risk of it being deleted there. Commons, however, cannot host any non-free material at all... it's a repository for freely-licensed media files only. The article you wrote on English Wikipedia won't be affected at all if this copy of the file is deleted. Hope that makes sense! Papa November (talk) 14:10, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- It makes perfect sense, I wasn't aware of the difference in policies. Thank you and sorry for the misunderstanding. McMarcoP (talk) 10:15, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Possible chance image may be copyrighted Mikemoral♪♫ 21:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Derivative work from copyrighted image, inserted {{Copyvio}}. --Simo82 (talk) 16:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Posted in error. IanRiccaboni (talk) 20:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I have since submitted a more suitable image Jameskramer (talk) 18:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Spam. --Bilderling (talk) 13:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Spam. --Bilderling (talk) 13:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Spam. --Bilderling (talk) 13:55, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Speedy Delete as copyrighted advertisement. --Rrburke (talk) 14:38, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Spam. --Bilderling (talk) 13:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Spam. --Bilderling (talk) 13:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Spam. --Bilderling (talk) 13:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Source is candiens.com, no valid license Xgeorg (talk) 12:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate; Incorrect name. Gaeser (talk) 19:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Also please see this discussion.--Gaeser (talk) 19:37, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't display correctly. Trying to upload it as png again. Florian Jesse (talk) 14:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
questionable original license on radswiki.net Radswiki (talk) 04:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Fixed error on change Gluck2.jpg by same author Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
duplicate of White Beech - seedling.JPG Poyt448 (talk) 10:12, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Duplicate of File:White Beech - seedling.JPG. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:32, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Want to remove it from my account. CoquitoLopez (talk) 16:20, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I created the file and a moment later spotted that I misspelled the name of the island. I have uploaded a duplicate under the correct name (File:Gugh island Scilly.svg). Hogweard (talk) 20:31, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
this icon has a wrong name and has been replaced by BSicon_vKBHFe-KBHFa.svg Wiebevl (talk) 00:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted video. No assertion of specific permission. Uploaded by disruptive cross-wiki spammer. Diego Grez (previously MisterWiki) let's talk 15:47, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This image was published to a chinese magazine before uploaded to here. Sysywjel (talk) 18:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This unique file copyright and license and also lacks information Elberth 00001939 (talk) 16:53, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I uploaded it, but named it incorrectly. Rrius (talk) 02:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
The author wants to delete this photo because he has uploaded much better one. The old file has strong distortions and blown out light fragments. PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Looks suitable to make it a redirect for File:D-gorki-domik-0427.jpg.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Agree to a dupe-deletion with redirect, as the older is already from 2009 and might be used externally. --Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
questionable original license on radswiki.net Radswiki (talk) 04:26, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Falsches Lemma Admiral Horthy (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
URV 87.193.229.85 08:24, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
this is not own work of the uploader, doubtful origin, probably a family archive + wrong license Gouwenaar (talk) 09:58, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Duplicate of File:Het wapen van Andries de Graeff.jpg. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:14, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
"aimable autorisation" n'est pas suffisant, sous quelle licence Forez-info a-t-il mis cette photo ?
"kindly given" is not enought: witch licence was really choosen by Forez-info? --MGuf (d) 12:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio form minecraft 80.161.143.239 14:00, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. Note that a custom texture pack is being used in this screenshot. The texture pack should be presumed copyrighted unless proved otherwise. If proved otherwise, this image isn't a violation of Minecraft's copyright as the only thing protected is the game textures. Kyores (talk) 10:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Please delete this picture, because it is ugly. Better to copy 
Kosioryt (talk) 10:35, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
A screenshot of a graph (Unknown source) which could be copyrighted but it's not the uploaders own work. Bidgee (talk) 10:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Seems PD-ineligible, but not used and not educationally useful; similar to File:Australia-demography.png. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- The source given is wrong and the image has been taken from this website Elzinik. There is even a watermark on the fileMegistias (talk) 22:03, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
bad name
new file: File:Grenzstein_MarkMeißen-Oberlausitz.jpg --WikiAnika (talk) 10:13, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:59, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm trying to NOT delete this image - I messed up in the licensing, and tried to fix it as the non-free but it wouldn't accept the change. Does anyone have suggestions/ideas of what needs to be done on this? This is my first try at uploading a non-free image, but I've failed miserably at it an need a bit of advice. Thanks for your assistance. Zul32 (talk) 23:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:59, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
no FOP in France, architect Roger-Henri Expert died in 1955. --Coyau (talk) 14:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:59, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This file lacks information and disrespects others leave it seems that the file was uploaded elsewhere Elberth 00001939 (talk) 17:23, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:59, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
This image is a duplicate of File:The execution of Guy Fawkes' (Guy Fawkes) by Claes (Nicolaes) Jansz Visscher.jpg Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 23:53, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:59, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of permission EhJJ (talk) 20:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: File has apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
User did not invent this flag, image needs a source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, in use, per COM:INUSE, at w:List of Puerto Rican flags. Simple geometric shapes. Let's not go deleting all the random flags at Category:Flags of Puerto Rico, thanks. -- Cirt (talk) 20:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep:Just an unofficial variant of the Puerto Rico flag, very bellow the COM:TOO and in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:03, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 17:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Exact duplicate of File:1200x1800 Erasmus.JPG. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:34, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
exact duplicate of File:1200x1800 Jan Joosten.JPG Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Did you mean File:2000x3000_Jan_Joosten.JPG? This file is not in use, but the bigger-resolution one seems blurrier than this smaller version. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Corrected nomination per Amitie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:39, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masaharu Kitayama (talk · contribs)
[edit]For "Encounter" file names:
The file descriptions explain who created the decorative image in this photo. While photo is user's own work, decorative image isn't. possible [[COM:COPYVIO].
For "Kiroshima" file names: Only the largest image is necessary the other uploads are direct duplicates of File:3000x2000 Kuroshima of Oita.JPG
Uploader may not understand that the Commons upload engine creates multiple file sizes and multiple uploads are not needed!
- File:900x600 Kuroshima of Oita.JPG
- File:1800x1200 Kuroshima of Oita.JPG
- File:1200x800 Kuroshima of Oita.JPG
- File:900x600 Encounter.JPG
- File:3000x2000 Encounter.JPG
- File:1200x800 Encounter.JPG
- File:1800x1200 Encounter.JPG
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Nominating for consensus on copyright holder of Lebanese passport? Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted. Yann (talk) 17:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Hayim logos
[edit]Proper permission is needed. These logotypes are not in the public domain
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 14:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Israel
Out of scope: Commons is not a ramdom repository of personal/touristic images
- File:Entering the old city (12149855126).jpg
- File:Feasting (12149682304).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres IMAG0098 (11872073156).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04273 (11872120644).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04274 (11871957203).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04275 (11871679835).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04287 (11872108284).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04288 (11871943683).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04302 (11871657215).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04306 (11871929723).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04308 (11871928743).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04319 (11872485566).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04327 (11871641165).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04328 (11872078864).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04334 (11872476066).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04337 (11872473236).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04340 (11872471026).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04352 (11871622765).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04353 (11872059524).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04359 (11871618125).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04366 (11872050804).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04367 (11872450976).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04375 (11871606775).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04379 (11872441936).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04380 (11871875963).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04382 (11872037914).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04383 (11872437936).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04385 (11872436956).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04388 (11872435086).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04389 (11872033024).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04390 (11871593875).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04391 (11872432356).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04402 (11871856243).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04413 (11872410146).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04414 (11871570905).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04425 (11872400776).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04426 (11871834533).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04428 (11871995984).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04439 (11871987614).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04449 (11871540265).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04451 (11871975844).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04453 (11871810643).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04454 (11871535675).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04455 (11871534565).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04456 (11872373006).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04495 (11871937864).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04509 (11871929614).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04510 (11871491275).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04511 (11872329586).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04512 (11871762273).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04513 (11872326536).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04514 (11871760303).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04516 (11871758713).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04517 (11871483825).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04518 (11871920394).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04519 (11872320696).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04521 (11871753673).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04522 (11872317546).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04523 (11872316706).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04524 (11871477055).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04525 (11871476135).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04536 (11871468515).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04541 (11872301896).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04571 (11871873904).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04609 (11871685193).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04611 (11871848804).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04634 (11872235026).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04798 (11871724044).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04799 (11871286005).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04801 (11871283695).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04802 (11871555533).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04803 (11872119136).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04804 (11871280525).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04805 (11871716404).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres IMAG0089 (11871243375).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres IMAG0102 (11871507383).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08434 (9537325941).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08450 (9537332019).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08489 (9538747899).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08490 (9538748421).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08494 (9538750757).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08495 (9538751757).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08566 (9541586084).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08580 (9542353804).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08647 (9539589197).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08659 (9560847857).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08667 (9563643696).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08684 (9560861995).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08694 (9563653980).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08695 (9560866987).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08709 (9560871887).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08827 (9626579578).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08895 (9629650984).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08923 (9629656616).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09035 (9629679724).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09154 (9626459099).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09156 (9629691744).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09174 (9626462557).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09195 (9629701210).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09197 (9626469855).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4093456712 4ba487f6be Good Guys O (9198163285).jpg
- File:Israel Friends (4259179476).jpg
- File:Israel Friends (4259179824).jpg
- File:Isreal063 edited-1 (882761881).jpg
- File:Jessica in Jaffa (12149777286).jpg
- File:Jessica in Jaffa (12149803746).jpg
- File:Jessica in Jerusalem (12149196255).jpg
- File:Jessica in Jerusalem (12149228415).jpg
- File:Jessica in Jerusalem (12149585324).jpg
- File:Me on a horse (4063441674).jpg
- File:On the beach (12149548923).jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 38196 Pretty Girl in a hike at the begging of the spring.JPG
- File:Sheinkin -Tel Aviv (3) (5362172078).jpg
- File:The western wall (12149628474).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09251 (9629725102).jpg
- File:Infinite Venessas (4073387642).jpg
- File:Everyone wants hummus (12149660464).jpg
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 17:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_56.jpg){kind=link}
_54.jpg){kind=link}
_85.jpg){kind=link}
_19.jpg){kind=link}
_55.jpg){kind=link}
_Starboard_Truss.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_n._0581_ebay.jpg){kind=link}
_-_portret.jpg){kind=link}
,_NSB_politicus_en_gemachtigde_voor_rechtskundige_aangelegenheden.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_SS-Führer_-_Bundesarchiv.jpg){kind=link}
_IMG_7245_ShiftN.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_56.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_56.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_56.jpg){kind=link}
_56.jpg){kind=link}
_54.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_54.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_54.jpg){kind=link}
_54.jpg){kind=link}
_85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_85.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_85.jpg){kind=link}
_85.jpg){kind=link}
_19.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_19.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_19.jpg){kind=link}
_19.jpg){kind=link}
_55.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_55.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_55.jpg){kind=link}
_55.jpg){kind=link}
_and_Lord_Nasher.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Starboard_Truss.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Starboard_Truss.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Terry_Virts.jpg){kind=link}
_Starboard_Truss.jpg){kind=link}
_Starboard_Truss.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_by_Claes_(Nicolaes)_Jansz_Visscher.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5362172078).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04272 (11871959663).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04276 (11872117944).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04293 (11871663855).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04296 (11871934953).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04320 (11872484776).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04338 (11871632645).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04356 (11872058524).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04358 (11872458276).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04357 (11872459236).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04376 (11871880023).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04381 (11872439766).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04387 (11872436066).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04392 (11871866303).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04397 (11871861563).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04393 (11871865473).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04406 (11871578355).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
User:Geagea does some mass uploading from Flickr and it seems s/he does not appear to review them. Some of the recent ones were of holiday snapshots and are unsuitable for Commons since they are personal, unused photos mainly showing one or the other or both of the holidaying couple. Some of the worst of them are: [list of nominated files] They can be seen in Category:Israel --Alan Liefting (talk) 08:18, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- I will have to reiterate what I said in that thread since you do not have appeared to have read it:
- "I do not have an "obsession" with Category:Israel. I am working on it because of all of the country categories, as seen from Commons:Categories_requiring_diffusion#Countries which I have already referred you to, is in the most dire need for diffusion."
- Can I suggest that you give a valid reason for keeping the images. Alan Liefting (talk) 08:37, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Obviously out of scope and not only "by-catch", so these streams clearly shouldn't have been uploaded in the first place. FDMS 4 17:32, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I have not reviewed the additional ones to my original DR but I take it on good faith that they are also suitable for deletion (especially the ones of the similar file names). Alan Liefting (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per num. -- Geagea (talk) 23:11, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Israel uploaded by [[User
- Geagea|Geagea]
Holiday snapshots that are beyond the scope of Commons. Tey also lack information about them.
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04507 (11871768253).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04508 (11871493155).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04515 (11871923464).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04520 (11871754713).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04537 (11871740673).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04595 (11871858364).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04598 (11871417555).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04601 (11871852694).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres IMAG0114 (11872058646).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Alan Liefting (talk) 06:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Hi! I think at least File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04508 (11871493155).jpg is in the scope of Commons (¿Category:Camels in Israel?). The rest... well... Strakhov (talk) 15:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Keep the following ones:
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04507 (11871768253).jpg (tourist attractions are in scope)
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04508 (11871493155).jpg (per Strakhov's)
Weak Keep the following ones (provided that we can identify the location):
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04598 (11871417555).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04601 (11871852694).jpg
Delete the remaining ones. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 15:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Kept: the few that where not deleted. Natuur12 (talk) 16:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Israel
Unused personal photos, holiday snapshots, and poor quality files of no conceivable use. The lack of descriptions is also problematic.
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres IMAG0100 (11871235625).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres IMAG0101 (11871672054).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres IMAG0114 (11872058646).jpg
- File:Israel 8 Jan 2012 14-56 (6683140065).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08509 (9541550416).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08511 (9541552206).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08514 (9538764345).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08515 (9541554776).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08516 (9541555584).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08517 (9538766857).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08522 (9538769875).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08575 (9538799411).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08673 (9563645670).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08678 (9563647538).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08680 (9560859933).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08681 (9563648328).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08689 (9560863591).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08692 (9563652908).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08697 (9560867605).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08698 (9563655878).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08699 (9563656542).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08700 (9560869615).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08710 (9560872413).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08711 (9563660490).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08712 (9560873285).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08721 (9563662470).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08726 (9560876531).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08880 (9626412501).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08900 (9629653276).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09042 (9626450465).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09043 (9626450935).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09044 (9629910970).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09046 (9629912130).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09238 (9629719064).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09243 (9629721310).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09245 (9629722534).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09246 (9629722910).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09247 (9626491617).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Alan Liefting (talk) 19:15, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Hi! I'd say
- Strong keep File:Israel DSC09044 (9629910970).jpg
- It seems a Livnot U'Lehibanot's establishment (I have no idea what's this thing). In fact, the English article in Wikipedia had no pic! The rest are mainly people-in-the-middle-of-something, things-in-the-middle-of-hands, and so-so photos. Nevertheless i'd give a try to this file File:Israel_DSC08516_(9541555584).jpg, since there are no faces "involved". ¿Category:Bricks? At least. There are other pics which could be valuable if a location were provided... Strakhov (talk) 22:35, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep the following ones and categorize as Category:Adobe (building material):
- Delete the remaining ones, with the likely exception of File:Israel DSC09044 (9629910970).jpg, as mentioned by Strakhov. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:42, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete
KeepFile:Israel 8 Jan 2012 14-56 (6683140065).jpg
- Hey, Discasto! This one is not that bad: ¿Category:Ocean surface waves? Strakhov (talk) 22:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- How many pictures of waves do we need? Especially ones with an unidentidied ship and not location info. Alan Liefting (talk) 22:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Well, we've pics of waves far way less artistic. It's already categorised... I don't know. I've found this one so delete the other one. Strakhov (talk) 23:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete
- File:Isreal174 (882804237).jpg
- File:Jessica in Jaffa (12149525594).jpg
- File:Israel DSC09161 (9629692910).jpg
- File:Underground pigeon coop (425863186).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The four above. Strakhov (talk) 23:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- I agree with deleting thsese extra four. One is blurred, the rest oare unused personal photos. More unneeded holiday snaps. Alan Liefting (talk) 23:12, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Delete
- File:Israel DSC08634 (9539587013).jpg not valuable for "Cushions", nor "Israel", nor "Candies", poor composition.
- File:Plane (8046902535).jpg blurred people in a plane
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04854 (11872087576).jpg not notable people gathering one place together doing not notable stuff
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres DSC04570 (11872276836).jpg holiday pic, not notable people just... being. not valuable for music or stuff like that. unused. apparently not a wikimedia event or stuff like that
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The four above. Strakhov (talk) 11:36, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept some deleted some: some where out of scope as holiday images but most have educational value. Natuur12 (talk) 16:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Israel
Various images many of which are from snap happy photographers on holiday and then blindly uploaded to Commons. Problems include blurred images, duplicates, unused personal photos, photos of peoples backs and very little else, poorly framed photos, etc. Also, they generally lack a suitable description and have poor file names.
- File:Israel (10712604035).jpg
- File:Israel 2009 by cseres IMAG0114 (11872058646).jpg
- File:Israel anemones - כלניות (6883601172).jpg
- File:Israel Beach (6683137325).jpg
- File:Israel Crocs and tzitzi (9629721856).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08630 (9539584357).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08631 (9542371992).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08662 (9563638138).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4017087172 9047a19e56 P1230934 O (9200893338).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4017102844 a148629ab7 P1230979 O (9200891780).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4026328142 e2bf920e27 P1240207 O (9198100659).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4077618366 41266bc8fa Candela O (9198073293).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4077715842 9d826fd669 P1240928 O (9198140293).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4088803917 8b185f23f2 P1250651 O (9200965838).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4088805833 a34153142a P1250657 O (9198185145).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4088806073 b67733a837 P1250658 O (9200964720).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4088806383 3c0be30c97 P1250659 O (9198184635).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4088806653 71d56e21c8 P1250660 O (9198184463).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4088806899 38fcf04169 P1250661 O (9200963728).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4089519418 daeaafb38f P1250511 O (9198172403).jpg
- File:Israel Egypt 2009 4093345928 a48328dcb9 P1250238 O (9198087759).jpg
- File:Israel Friday noon (4259178942).jpg
- File:Israel Gate at Church of the Pater Noster, Israel (8269491222).jpg
- File:Israel Integrated (4258424675).jpg
- File:Israel south (5085779125).jpg
- File:Israel south (5086377090).jpg
- File:Israel streets by Dainis Matisons (3308111099).jpg
- File:Isreal012 (882758255).jpg
- File:Isreal053 (882760715).jpg
- File:Isreal055 (883611136).jpg
- File:Isreal059 (882761123).jpg
- File:Isreal077 (883615570).jpg
- File:Isreal133 (882789587).jpg
- File:Isreal174 (882804237).jpg
- File:Jessica in Jaffa (12149525594).jpg
- File:Jessica in Jaffa (12149812816).jpg
- File:Maya surfing.jpg
- File:Mc Donald's (8046839702).jpg
- File:Mfo.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 36884 Art of Israel.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 36885 Art of Israel.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 36886 Art of Israel.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37013 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37033 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37035 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37036 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37037 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37038 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37160 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37194 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37209 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37212 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37213 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37284 Lonely at the Beach.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37326 Yom Kippur.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37333 proposed syllables.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37399 Vacation Experience.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37484 Vacation Experience.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37503 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37612 The wind blows.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37615 Beetle village.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37695 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37696 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37735 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37743 Vacation Experience.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37793 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37795 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37800 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 38151 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 38167 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 38276 Vacation Experience.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 38277 Vacation Experience.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 38665 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:Plane (8046902535).jpg
- File:Tempura shrimp on roasted aubergine (12149572383).jpg
- File:The trail (4062695327).jpg
- File:The western wall (12149473813).jpg
- File:Tomato and mozarrella (12149566873).jpg
- File:Tomato and mozarrella (12149717844).jpg
- File:Trance nature party in israel.JPG
- File:Underground pigeon coop (425863186).jpg
- File:דוריאן.jpg
- File:התכנית למנהיגות מדעית.jpg
- File:לזכר 3 הנערים (4).JPG
- File:לזכר 3 הנערים(2).JPG
- File:לזכר 3 הנערים(5).JPG
- File:לזכר 3 הנערים(6).JPG
- File:לזכר 3 הנערים.JPG
- File:לטאה.JPG
- File:מדעדודס.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Alan Liefting (talk) 16:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete The following ones:
- File:Isreal059 (882761123).jpg
- File:Isreal077 (883615570).jpg
- File:Maya surfing.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37209 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37213 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37333 proposed syllables.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37399 Vacation Experience.jpg (per COM:DW)
- File:Israel 2009 4077618366 41266bc8fa Candela O (9198073293).jpg
- File:Israel Friday noon (4259178942).jpg
- File:Israel Integrated (4258424675).jpg
- File:Israel south (5085779125).jpg
- File:Israel south (5086377090).jpg
- File:Israel (10712604035).jpg
- File:Israel Beach (6683137325).jpg
- File:Israel DSC08662 (9563638138).jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37695 Vacation Experience.JPG (per COM:DW)
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37735 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37793 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 37795 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 38276 Vacation Experience.jpg
- File:PikiWiki Israel 38151 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:PikiWiki Israel 38167 Vacation Experience.JPG
- File:לזכר 3 הנערים(2).JPG
- File:לזכר 3 הנערים(6).JPG
- File:לזכר 3 הנערים.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Keep The remaining ones. The PikiWiki images are quite useful as stock photos. BR --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 18:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept some deleted some: some files where in use others are perfectly in scope and some where out of scope. Natuur12 (talk) 17:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Israel
Various image that are not within the scope of Commons.
- File:Isreal131 (883639234).jpg - no usable subject
- File:Meal (8046905548).jpg - no usable subject
- File:People watching (4097648726).jpg- no usable subject
- File:Saying goodbye to Inbal (12149950126).jpg - unused personal image with no usable subject
- File:Snow. Ford Sierra. Israel (15784935804).jpg - no usable subject
- File:Souq al-Qattanin, Jerusalem, Israel (16221870911).jpg - no usable subject
- File:Souq, Bethlehem, Israel (16223694755).jpg - no usable subject and no description
- File:South wall (4107569220).jpg - overexposed
- File:The winding stair (4090087853).jpg - no usable subject
- File:UNDOF Golan Heights vehicle.JPG- no usable subject
- File:Venessa's foot and the long fall down (4072767367).jpg - unused personal image with no usable subject
- File:Welcome to Jordan (4076577626).jpg - overexposed
- File:Welcome to Jordan (4200647981).jpg - overexposed
- File:Wing (8046908803).jpg - no usable subject
- File:Wing view (8046822673).jpg - no usable subject
- File:גלרית קדם.jpg - no usable subject and insufficient description
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Alan Liefting (talk) 18:10, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Jesus! This file is not even from Israel! It seems (as the coordinates and user description suggest) the pic comes from Perm, Russia!! The tags in flickr are, in fact, #Ford #Sierra #Snow ¡¡#Ural!! #Winter. Folder's name was 2015. Pic's name wasIMG_20150131_095650. How this file ended in Category:Israel?
Strakhov (talk) 13:14, 7 March 2015 (UTC) - By the way, how could File:גלרית קדם.jpg be "no usable subject" if it's in fact used in two Wikipedia articles 1 & 2...? Strakhov (talk) 13:23, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Jesus! This file is not even from Israel! It seems (as the coordinates and user description suggest) the pic comes from Perm, Russia!! The tags in flickr are, in fact, #Ford #Sierra #Snow ¡¡#Ural!! #Winter. Folder's name was 2015. Pic's name wasIMG_20150131_095650. How this file ended in Category:Israel?
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: except a few, poor quality. Yann (talk) 13:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
File was corrupted. Correct version of this file: File:Georg_Benedikt_von_Ogilvy2.jpg Ctac (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
User is trying to copyright this file! 75.145.16.233 18:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: I do not understand the reason for deletion. The image is within scope and appears to be released under a free license, so what is the rationale for deleting it? —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 12:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 17:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
_-_n._0581_ebay.jpg){kind=link}
_-_n._0581_ebay.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It depicts a nude minor. 98.249.232.106 22:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
_-_n._0581_ebay.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 17:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
_-_n._0581_ebay.jpg){kind=link}
Image posted by Wikipedia spammer copied from [4]. Page states "Copyright SKYlasers 2010, All rights reserved". 75.196.56.23 01:42, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:52, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Sixas (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC) There is a recent version of this file loaded the 04th of June on Commons.
Deleted: No file by that name. Yann (talk) 17:50, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
UNUSED IMAGE WITH INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO MAKE IT EDUCATIONALLY USEFULL Alan Liefting (talk) 22:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
(OOPS, DIDN'T MEAN TO SHOUT)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:49, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Inutilité encyclopédique + mauvaise qualité + DIFFAMANT pour la personne en rouge accusée de mendicité Ddjahh (talk) 23:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Low qualitiy portrait of unimportant person Lymantria (talk) 06:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Google shows knowledge graph boxes for this person in every language. Here you can find an example. Google also shows tons of quick answer boxes on the top of search results when people search something like "how tall is Danilo Petrozzi" (example here). Danilopetrozzi
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Low quality persopnal picture Lymantria (talk) 06:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Google shows knowledge graph boxes for this person in every language. Here you can find an example. Google also shows tons of quick answer boxes on the top of search results when people search something like "how tall is Danilo Petrozzi" (example here). Danilopetrozzi
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Low resolution portrait of unimportant person Lymantria (talk) 06:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Google shows knowledge graph boxes for this person in every language. Here you can find an example. Google also shows tons of quick answer boxes on the top of search results when people search something like "how tall is Danilo Petrozzi" (example here). Danilopetrozzi
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Low resolution, non notable person Lymantria (talk) 06:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Google shows knowledge graph boxes for this person in every language. Here you can find an example. Google also shows tons of quick answer boxes on the top of search results when people search something like "how tall is Danilo Petrozzi" (example here). Danilopetrozzi
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Portrait of non notable person, low resolution Lymantria (talk) 06:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Google shows knowledge graph boxes for this person in every language. Here you can find an example. Google also shows tons of quick answer boxes on the top of search results when people search something like "how tall is Danilo Petrozzi" (example here). Danilopetrozzi
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files of User:Jcpag2012
[edit]User:Jcpag2012 seems to be a prolific uploader of copyrighted astronomical images. Many of the images are taken from the "Astronomy Picture of the Day" [APOD] pages on the NASA site, but are not NASA-created images but have been created by various individuals, in which case Jcpag2012 has released the image into the public domain on behalf of the copyright holder! I have been through his most recent 50 uploads, and listed below some obvious copyright violations, but someone experienced in astronomical images needs to review all of this user's uploads, as I am certain that many more of his uploads are copyright violations. BabelStone (talk) 19:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Thad K. V'Soske" but source specifies "©2001 Thad K. V'Soske"
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Norman Appleton" but source specifies "©2000 Norman Appleton"
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Tom Bailey" but source is APOD so this is highly unlikely.
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Paulo Raymundo" but source is APOD so this is highly unlikely.
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Fred Espenak" but source specifies "©2001 F. Espenak".
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, A. Dimai" but source is APOD so this is highly unlikely.
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, David A. Hardy" but source specifies "All art is ©David A. Hardy/AstroArt, and may not be used without written permission".
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Joe Tucciarone" but the source specifies "All of Joe Tucciarone's space and dinosaur illustrations are protected by copyright; none of them are in the public domain".
- License for these three specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Mark A. Garlick" but the source specifies "Any usage of my work for which I did not grant permission, even if it's a personal site, is an infringement of my copyright and is therefore against the law".
- File:Artist impression of Mu Arae e.jpg
- File:Artist impression of Tau Ceti e.jpg
- File:Artist impression of Tau Ceti f.jpg
- File:Artist impression of HD 40307 b.jpg
- File:Artist impression of HD 40307 g.jpg
- No sources are given for these artist's impressions, but uploader specifies that they are his own work. This is extremely unlikely, and given his history it is safe to assume they have been lifted from some random site on the internet.
- Licensed under PD NASA but source specifies "Copyright 2008 Calvin J. Hamilton".
- Licensed under PD NASA but source specifies "Copyright 2008 Calvin J. Hamilton".
- File:Comet Shoemaker-Levy and Jupiter.jpg
- File:Artist impression of Voyager 2 at Uranus.jpg
- File:Artwork of Voyager 2 Encounter with Uranus.jpg
- File:Artwork of the Solar System.jpg
- File:Big Bang Artwork.jpg
- File:Artwork of Solar Prominence.jpg
- File:Artwork of First Comet Impacts on Jupiter in 1994.jpg
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Julian Baum" but source does not suggest that it is PD
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Lynette Cook" but source specifies "Copyright © 1998-2015 Lynette R. Cook".
- "own work" -- implausible
- "own work" -- implausible
Deleted: Per nomination. Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files of User:Jcpag2012
[edit]- File:Kepler-61 b.jpg
- File:HD 40307 g.jpg
- File:Gliese 777 c.jpg
- File:Kepler-11f.jpg
- File:Kepler-20c.jpg
- File:Kepler-40 b.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Jcpag2012. I believe they should be deleted because this is crap. Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 06:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
self made — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bordoolol (talk • contribs) 2015-03-01T12:02:16 (UTC)
- Keep. The image is in use, and is therefore within scope per COM:INUSE, and it has apparently been released under a CC-BY-SA license. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 12:10, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 19:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
I took this image with my school's camera. I downsized it to a 4" tall jpeg at 72dpi because I thought that was the biggest anyone would view it on a wikipedia page. Alex Slade — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexislade (talk • contribs) 16:03, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader has had 14 days to upload a larger version and has not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep – This file is a scan of an original photo we have in our possession. The subject (Jenny Twitchell Kempton) is my great great grandmother. I am new to posting on Wikipedia, so not sure how to clear this up so the photo is not deleted. JonesSF
- Keep – The subject died in 1921 at the age of 85; the photo was apparently taken in 1860, by which time she hadn't left the US yet. Why wouldn't any of {{PD-US-unpublished}}, {{PD-old-auto-unpublished}}, or similar, be applicable? In other words, which set of circumstances would reasonably have to exist for this work work to be under copyright? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploaded as own work which it clearly is not; image needs more information regarding copyright status. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Ellin Beltz Ellin you are not justified in deleting this photo. This is from a photo we have in our possession, created around 1860. What set of circumstances would be possible for this to have a copyright issue? I am not sure why you have done this or inserted yourself here.
- Restored: 1960 is old enough. See also Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:JennyTwitchell - 1860.jpg. Yann (talk) 21:28, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Dear Discasto, why is this being listed as a derivative work, while there are a lot of other signs not neccesary made by the uploader on Wikimedia Commons?! Today I also uploaded a picture I took of a beer can. Pictures like that don't seem to bother anyone, but they're still the creative work of the breweries. Kind regards, Duveltje97
Deleted: Per nomination, photograph of a sign. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Poor quality pdf of File:Palmach-negev-instructed2operation.jpg. Alan Liefting (talk) 17:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- I will appreciate it if the image will not be deleted. It is true that the quality is problematic, but in my opinion it is still sufficiently clear. I added it to the Israel article in the English Wikipedia.
- I will try to find a better quality version of this image. Ykantor (talk) 19:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- As I mentioned File:Palmach-negev-instructed2operation.jpg is a suitable replacement. Alan Liefting (talk) 20:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, now tagged as {{superseded|Palmach-negev-instructed2operation.jpg}} and updated on Israel. –Be..anyone (talk) 12:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: replaced with better file, see Be..anyone Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
No longer suitable, no longer a crossdresser Kim Sherman1 (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:2008 Lent Festival - Sirenium
[edit]  | This image contains digital watermarking or credits in the image itself. The usage of visible watermarks is discouraged. If a non-watermarked version of the image is available, please upload it under the same file name and then remove this template. Ensure that removed information is present in the image description page and replace this template with {{Metadata from image}} or {{Attribution metadata from licensed image}}.
Caution: Before removing a watermark from a copyrighted image, please read the WMF's analysis of the legal ramifications of doing so, as well as Commons' proposed policy regarding watermarks. If the old version is still useful, for example if removing the watermark damages the image significantly, upload the new version under a different title so that both can be used. After uploading the non-watermarked version, replace this template with{{Superseded|new filename|version without watermarks}}. |
- File:2008 Lent Festival - Sirenium (1).jpg
- File:2008 Lent Festival - Sirenium (2).jpg
- File:2008 Lent Festival - Sirenium (3).jpg
- File:2008 Lent Festival - Sirenium (4).jpg
- File:2008 Lent Festival - Sirenium (5).jpg
- File:2008 Lent Festival - Sirenium (6).jpg
- File:2008 Lent Festival - Sirenium (7).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 19:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Images from professional photographer's website. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Heinrich Hoffmann
[edit]Heinrich Hoffmann ist 1957 verstorben, Bilder sind nicht frei, Bundesarchiv hat keine Rechte an den Bildern
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-00344, München, nach Hitler-Ludendorff Prozess.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-00344A, München, nach Hitler-Ludendorff Prozess retouched.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-00344A, München, nach Hitler-Ludendorff Prozess.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-2008-1016-502, Nürnberg, Reichsparteitag der NSDAP.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-2003-1128-500, Münchener Abkommen, Unterschrift Benito Mussolini retouched.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-2003-1128-500, Münchener Abkommen, Unterschrift Benito Mussolini.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R72204, Münchener Abkommen, Unterschrift Daladier.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R99057, "Wolfsschanze", Adolf Hitler mit Stab.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1983-0210-507, Berlin, Staatsakt für Admiral von Trotha.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1971-100-10, Staatsakt für den verstorbenen Ernst Udet.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-B06275, Berlin, Reichstagssitzung, Rede Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Brundage at Berlin.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-10460, Adolf Hitler, Rednerposen.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-13774, Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 137-048390, Berlin, SA-Aufmarsch am Brandenburger Tor.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1968-101-20A, Joseph Goebbels.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1970-050-07, Berlin, Emil Hacha bei Hitler.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1971-041-31, Münchener Abkommen, Mussolini, Hitler, Daladier.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1973-034-42, Obersalzberg, Adolf Hitler im Haus Wachenfeld.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1975-138-12, Josef Rettemeier.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1977-149-13, Hermann Göring, Adolf Hitler, Albert Speer.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1977-159-11, Bad Godesberg, Münchener Abkommen, Vorbereitung.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1978-043-13, Erwin v. Witzleben.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1978-043-14, Horst Wessel.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1979-026-23, Adolf Hitler und Albert Speer.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1987-004-09A, Amin al Husseini und Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1990-048-29A, Adolf Hitler-colorized.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1990-048-29A, Adolf Hitler.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1993-021-06, Berlin, Reichsluftfahrtministerium.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-2005-0020, Adolf Hitler auf einem Feldflugplatz im Osten.jpg
Ralf Roleček 10:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- I think we'd need some evidence that the Bundesarchiv did not have the right to donate them to Commons.--Wehwalt (talk) 10:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- I agree with Wehwalt.--Chamarasca (talk) 11:13, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Me too. AM (talk) 16:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- I agree with Wehwalt.--Chamarasca (talk) 11:13, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- The question is, who has the rights of Hoffmann's photographs today? Hoffmann was engaged by Adolf Hitler. Perhaps he bought the pictures and their rights from Hoffmann. In that case his photos should be public domain as they are considered to be in the USA. HeinrichStuerzl (talk) 18:53, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
This is clearly up to the Bundesarchive. Its a trustworthy source of pd images. 09:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep Most of these works were made as part of his organic work within the NSDAP and the german state. Thus they are to be considered as work of the Third Reich german government and those works had been transferred to the Bundesarchive. --Denniss (talk) 13:20, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- On Category:Heinrich Hoffmann it says: "The copyright in Germany on these photos is owned by the German state. The German Federal Archive has in December 2008 released a number of 800px-reproductions of Hoffmann's photographs licensed as {{cc-by-sa-3.0-de}}."
- There needs to be an argument for deletion beyond saying that he died in 1957... AnonMoos (talk) 16:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep Without further evidence, we have to assume that the rights are now held by the Bundesarchiv. --Phrontis (talk) 19:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep per my comment above.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:01, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Es gibt im deutschen Recht keine Möglichkeit, daß "der Staat" oder "das Bundesarchiv" die Rechte erlangen kann. Einzige Möglichkeit wäre das Erbe, was nicht zutrifft. --Ralf Roleček 13:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep Per Wehwart. Ralf Roleček's arguments seem to be based exclusively in his own opinion or interpretation. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Info its now listet here: Commons:Bundesarchiv/Questionable_licensing#Files_of_Category:Heinrich_Hoffmann --Ralf Roleček 19:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep See above. --Austriantraveler (talk) 13:22, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep It is clear that Bundesarchiv can transfer the rights.--Chamarasca (talk) 13:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Wenn sie die Rechte hätten, könnten sie auch transferieren. Haben sie aber nicht. --Ralf Roleček 17:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Deberás demostrar que no tiene los derechos. No podemos presumir tal cosa.--Chamarasca (talk) 19:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Maybe for experts in copyright law the following informations may be helpful. 1) General information about usage of pictures from the Bundesarchiv can be found here: [5] 2) The Bundesarchivgesetz (in German): [6] § 2 (8) mentions that images whose rights went from the German Reich to the Bundesarchiv are subject to the Bundesarchivgesetz. In contrast to Ralf Roleček's opinion, the Bundearchiv can have rights on images (I suppose Heinrich Hoffmann was paid by the German Reich for the images in question). --Phrontis (talk) 22:16, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Files of User:Bernie1974
[edit]
Reasons for deletion request Photographer of the picture don't want to provide this pictures in Wiki any more....
- ---
- Kept in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Files of User:Caetch
[edit]
The user says "Te cuento en detalle lo de las fotos. Las mismas están a disposición en internet." (trans: I'll tell you a detail about the photos. They are available on the internet). The user failed to explain the free source of the photos and failed to get the required permissions for them to remain in commons. Per user copyvio history. --Zeroth (talk) 02:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader acknowledged images were from internet, not own work. Importance of subject is no reason to violate copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Files of User:Carmenrojasgordillo
[edit]- File:Autorretratojosegordillo.jpg
- File:Lasaguadoras.jpg
- File:Abuela.jpg
- File:Almendros.jpg
- File:Fruteria copia.jpg
- File:Viejo.jpg
Apparently paintings by es:José_Gordillo_Sánchez (1888-1972). No permission nor date. License tag: "self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all".
Possibly an OTRS can be requested but the user has not been active here nor on Spanish Wikipedia since 2007 --Zolo (talk) 11:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: Painter died in 1972. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Contains copyrighted Windows parts. Smile4ever (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping, file was previously deleted, closing nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Filename is misleading; image is an obvious TV screen capture.Jarhed (talk) 02:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- I have over 200 photos from the event, want to see them all? Gage (talk) 02:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- And actually, I guess my photos are also "screenshots" of Newt Gingrich, Ann Coulter, Jim DeMint, Marco Rubio, John Fund, Thomas Woods, Thomas DiLorenzo, those are definitely a TV screen capture also. I've uploaded hundreds of my own photos in the past, I'm not some newly registered, useless member like yourself. Gage (talk) 02:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator was not careful and didn't check the other images by uploader before making the nomination. It's the curse of the professional photographer on Commons ! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Mistake Kirco (talk) 12:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
_-_portret.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_portret.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's not possible that the subject is about 30 years old. He seems much more older Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
_-_portret.jpg){kind=link}
- I have known young very formal people looking like this (even at 25!), so it is not impossible in my view. Hansmuller (talk) 13:38, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: WIth unknown author, there is no way to know if he/she has been dead 70 years or not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
_-_portret.jpg){kind=link}
Extremely unlikely date Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Why is it unlikely? He killed himself in July 1946, see w:en:Christiaan Lindemans (1912-1946). Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 23:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copied from 2004 book, with "unknown author" claim. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:2009
[edit]Unused images that are personal snapshots or of no possible use.
- File:Carnaval de Paris 22 février 2009 108.JPG
- File:Central park (4427016413).jpg
- File:Central park (4427778234).jpg
- File:Double mini roundabout (3418950304).jpg
- File:Double mini roundabout (3418951352).jpg
- File:Double mini roundabout (3418952612).jpg
- File:Guappo (4427015961).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Alan Liefting (talk) 23:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- I dont see the reason for the delation. Why we should delete pictures, where someone is on them? The fact that these pictures are not use is not the reason the delete them. My argument is, that these pictures are free and has a potental of educational character. Thats why they should stay, because, thats the goal of Wikimedia Commons.--Juandev (talk) 22:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- In my opinion, three of the unremarkable images of an individual who is smoking, drinking, sitting, etc fall well within the policy at Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful. Alan Liefting (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- ---
- Mixed close ... Deleted the same guy in pictures mugging for camera (Commons not personal photo album); kept the roundabouts and carnival photos (potential educational use).
Reasons for deletion request -Weissbier (talk) 15:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC) Diese Datei wird nicht im Artikelnamensraum verwendet [7]. Es handelt sich auch nicht um ein offizielles Symbol der Bundeswehr oder ähnliches. Ein Benutzer hat einfach das Bundeswehrkreuz und die Nationalfarben auf eine gelbe Schleife gepappt. Die hier abgebildete Devotionalie einer Privatperson im Kleinvertrieb sieht ebenfalls anders aus. Ich kann mir beim besten Willen keine sinnvolle Verwendung für eine Enzyklopädie vorstellen. Weissbier (talk) 15:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
![[7]](?x=https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spezial%3ALinkliste&target=Datei%3AGelbe+schleife+bw.jpg&namespace=0){kind=link}
- Keep Antragsteller auf de-WP für solchen Quatsch bekannt. --TheK (talk) 16:39, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep The fact that an image is actually not used is no valid reason for deletion. --Stepro (talk) 16:41, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
No valid reason for deletion, highly in use --> speedy keep abf «Cabale!» 16:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 24.191.98.53 as Copyvio (copyvio) Yann (talk) 08:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Stifle (talk) 11:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
appears to be an AP image from the source: http://www.voanews.com/media/photogallery/175216.html; licensing template states therefore not in public domain. JMWt (talk) 09:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- The source explicitely stats that the photo is created by VOA. The watermarks arent fixed on the images but technically added later to all VOA images, no matter its from VOA or AP, compare http://gdb.voanews.com/96D6877B-3273-41D1-92DF-E0F259C86952_mw640_mh360.JPG and http://gdb.voanews.com/96D6877B-3273-41D1-92DF-E0F259C86952_mw640_mh360_s.JPG. At the time of upload there was no such watermark on most images on VOA website and no watermarks on VOA created content, I suspect they later added it to all files because they to often forgot the correct labeling of AP or Reuters content. A check in AP database doesnt show this photo, not today and not at the day of my upload. --Martin H. (talk) 14:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- I suspect you'll have to talk to VOA about that. Their useage terms state "Vendor Content: The VOA News and Information Websites may contain text, video, audio, images, graphics, and other copyrighted material furnished by the Associated Press, Reuters, AFP, ABC News, and other content providers (collectively, “Vendor Content”). The Vendor Content is licensed for use in VOA programming only. Vendor Content is copyright protected and other than as stated above, may not be copied, redistributed, sold, or published without the express permission of the above-mentioned vendors or other copyright owners. Images, graphics, or video programming on VOA News and Information Websites may include a visual mark indicating the inclusion of any Vendor Content. You should assume all audio and radio programming on VOA News and Information Websites includes Vendor Content unless VOA specifically informs you otherwise."
- As the mark is there, it seems to me as it says you should assume it is vendor content. JMWt (talk) 17:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for sharing your experience with VOA files with us. We had the same on files such as File:VOA Markosian - Chernobyl02.jpg whith the same situation: No AP logo at the day of upload, clearly described as created by a VOA photogapher at the VOA website. And the EXIF confirms authorship. As I said: VOA relabled all old files with an AP watermark. Thats meaningles, the statment on the website was clear in the past and is still valid: The caption reads VOA - P. Heinlein. What doubt do you have that Peter Heinlein is not the photographer? --Martin H. (talk) 03:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
-
- Thank you for assuming I am acting in bad faith, in fact I am reading the useage terms as supplied by VOA for the reuse of their images. Whether or not the image had the tag when it was uploaded makes no difference to the question of whether it was "vendor content", and given that it was added subsequently as per their usage terms, this should be an indication that they think it is vendor content as per the above user content. I have no opinions on who took the photo as, as is suggested in the copied section above, the visual mark indicates that it is Vendor Content. I will be taking this further for another opinion. JMWt (talk) 15:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- At the moment of upload it has not been labled as vendor content. The watermark is added by a technical trick that may change over time without individual check by the publisher. The description has been published by the publisher, it was and still is 100% clear about the authorship. The photo is created by a VOA employee. The later adding of a watermark can not change that. --Martin H. (talk)
- Comment The image [8] has a AP watermark. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per Martin H. The original image without a watermark is still present on VOA's webservers [9] and I, too, can't find any content by Peter Heinlein on the AP Images website. This seems to be a programming error by VOA. De728631 (talk) 17:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
![[9]](?x=http://gdb.voanews.com/96D6877B-3273-41D1-92DF-E0F259C86952_mw1263_mh555.JPG){kind=link}
- Keep Repeating some links I made on the Village Pump... much of the content on VOA's site is taken from AP, correct. However... that image has a credit of "VOA - P. Heinlein" which seems to indicate it was indeed authored by a VOA employee. In looking, this article is about Peter Heinlein and an incident in Ethiopia, and states "Heinlein, an east Africa correspondent based in Addis Ababa, has worked for VOA since 1988." So I think that one was indeed a VoA employee. I would guess they run many of their images through a filter which adds "AP" but it's not always true (pretty sure I've seen that before). Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD - US Federal government Stifle (talk) 11:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Uploader claims that this file is his work, although he mainly used protected files from other websites (for example: http://zeljko-heimer-fame.from.hr/hrvat/hr-vu2.html#hr-vu-tr). I suggest deletion. --IvanOS (talk) 14:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- I forgot about this file. Yes, we had a conversation on this issue and it turned out that municipalities coats of arms in Croatia are not in public domain (I do not know how). I will remove the municipal coat of arms. Have a nice day and spread love instead of hate.--MirkoS18 (talk) 15:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Have a nice day.--MirkoS18 (talk) 15:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Stifle (talk) 11:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
I suggest deletion because uploader claimed that this file is his work, although he mainly used protected files from other websites (for example: http://zeljko-heimer-fame.from.hr/hrvat/hr-vu2.html#hr-vu-bo). IvanOS (talk) 14:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- I forgot about this file. Yes, we had a conversation on this issue and it turned out that municipalities coats of arms in Croatia are not in public domain (I do not know how). I will remove the municipal coat of arms. Have a nice day and spread love instead of hate.--MirkoS18 (talk) 15:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Have a nice day.--MirkoS18 (talk) 15:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Stifle (talk) 11:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
I suggest deletion because uploader claimed that this file is his work, although he used file of another author without specifying of real author. (for example: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CrkvaGabos.jpg). Please, pay attention on licensing of file. IvanOS (talk) 14:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- I forgot to add this part in file description. I will remove that part. Have a nice day and spread love instead of hate.--MirkoS18 (talk) 15:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Have a nice day.--MirkoS18 (talk) 15:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Stifle (talk) 11:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
I suggest deletion because uploader claimed that this file is his work, although he mainly used protected files from other websites (for example: http://zeljko-heimer-fame.from.hr/hrvat/hr-vu2.html#hr-vu-ne). IvanOS (talk) 14:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- I forgot about this file. Yes, we had a conversation on this issue and it turned out that municipalities coats of arms in Croatia are not in public domain (I do not know how). I will remove the municipal coat of arms. Have a nice day and spread love instead of hate.--MirkoS18 (talk) 15:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Have a nice day.--MirkoS18 (talk) 15:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Stifle (talk) 11:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as no permission (No permission since): I have received communication on my talk page from uploader who states he feels this image is below COM:TOO despite being cropped from an album/cd cover. I am converting my no permission nomination to a full deletion nomination to achieve consensus on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, there's nothing here but simple letters from various alphabets, compare with File:Lost letters.jpg. -- Cirt (talk) 20:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep (if my vote is allowed)
- I apologize for my english, I'm an italian contributor and I have many difficulties to speak in this languege... The file in object is cropped from the DVD box of the series published in Italy by Dinit, this is the original image. The cropped image loaded, even if it comes from a DVD Cover (not admitted in Commons) contains only text and Japanes characters; I thought it was an istance of COM:TOO like this logos. If I'm wrong, please delete the file. --Bradipo Lento (talk) 08:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-text Stifle (talk) 11:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yamaha5 as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: not free. it has water mark at top But the file is big and has camera data, it is even used. Bytheway, watermark is in bottom left corner. Taivo (talk) 20:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Stifle (talk) 11:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yamaha5 as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: not free. it has water mark at top The file is not big and it has no camera data. But the user's most other uploads are good. Bytheway, watermark is on bottom left corner. Taivo (talk) 20:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Stifle (talk) 11:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Pashtrig Natyra me e zhvilluar ne Europe . Llojshmeri te pafundshme bimesh dhe lulesh..jpg
[edit]
taken from File:All_in_one.jpg Daorssahatciu (talk) 09:56, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused crop Stifle (talk) 11:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Moreover, there is a better option: File:Italy looking like the flag.svg D5A (talk) 13:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Are you the final arbiter of what is "better"? Why is the other version "better"? And why should this subjective version of "better" you have be a valid reason for deleting a perfectly good image? --Fred the Oyster (talk) 15:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Now, thanks to my work, it is better. D5A (talk) 16:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- No. Thanks to your work the files size has quadrupled, Sicily has become half transparent and you've managed to replicate the other flag map of Italy by using coloured strokes. Your edit summary of "fix" was incorrect. A more accurate one would have been "break". I have now reverted it back to my original. It will either be deleted or it won't. What it won't be is messed about with by an amateur. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 19:41, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. The file is in use (on hundreds of pages) and is therefore within scope per COM:INUSE. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 12:13, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Generally in use, no good reason to delete. Not sure how the DR stayed open for 3 years though! Stifle (talk) 11:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Creator has also uploaded copyrighted material of discus throwers and the angle/perspective of this shot suggests a similar infringement as only professional photographers can occupy this area at meetings. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 12:17, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably copyvio. Stifle (talk) 11:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Image is so pixelated it appears to be television screenshot. No Metadata. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - The picture was taken with a cell phone at a game to replace the old, very fuzzy photo that was being used that also appeared to be taken by a phone. Please help me understand where a copyright violation would come in? The previous photo that was up was taken at a Lakers game when he coached ther many years ago. What was okay with that one, but not okay with this one? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lluchetti (talk • contribs)
- For the record, the "old, very fuzzy photo" referred to is File:Quin Snyder.jpg. The low quality is because it was cropped from another photo, which was high quality and had metadata.Bagumba (talk) 02:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, per explanation by Lluchetti (talk · contribs), above. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 20:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I don't know enough about metadata to know if it's significant that it's missing from the photo. The photo does seem awfully pixelated per the nominator, and low quality. Could be the model of phone or phone settings, or perhaps it's an extreme zoom shot (though in my experience it'd be more grainy than pixelated). Or was it edited afterwards? Perhaps the author can provide more background to quell concerns that they did not take this shot in person. At any rate, with the prior debate at w:Talk:Quin_Snyder#So_why_exactly_can_the_photo_not_be_used.3F about needing a high-quality shot, not sure if this is any better (and the subject is looking down too).Bagumba (talk) 02:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- It's not just that the photo is pixelated. It's that the pixelation indicates a video still (more bubbly and blurry than the graininess you'd get with most point-and-shoot/cell phone camera). Without any more information to verify the license, I'd say delete. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
I have uploaded new and improved version of a file under different name (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Serbia_in_the_Yugoslav_Wars.png), so this is a duplicate and it should be deleted.--Mladifilozof (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - highly POV file (especially its title) - as was explained on file discussion page. PANONIAN (talk) 23:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - No, the filename is correct. Greaterserbianist conquered parts of Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. The filename "Serbia in the Yugoslav Wars" isn't correct. It wasn't just Serbia involved in the campaign conquest (although Serbia was the starter of that campaign), but also the Greaterserbianist forces from Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Montenegro. Therefore "Greater Serbian". Kubura (talk) 03:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
This image is no longer duplicate, so this voting is closed. --Mladifilozof (talk) 03:27, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 18:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Marine Corps Air Station Yuma
[edit]Does the mere fact of being a U.S. marine or a member of their families make his/her artwork be in the public domain?
- File:Draw, Brush! SMP Art Show Displays Marines’ Artistic Sides DVIDS862542.jpg
- File:Draw, Brush! SMP Art Show Displays Marines’ Artistic Sides DVIDS862543.jpg
- File:Draw, Brush! SMP Art Show Displays Marines’ Artistic Sides DVIDS862544.jpg
- File:Draw, Brush! SMP Art Show Displays Marines’ Artistic Sides DVIDS862545.jpg
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Derivative works of Sesame Street puppets
- File:USO Sesame Street Experience Rocks MCAS Yuma 140821-M-NB398-015.jpg
- File:USO Sesame Street Experience Rocks MCAS Yuma 140821-M-NB398-014.jpg
- File:USO Sesame Street Experience Rocks MCAS Yuma 140821-M-NB398-013.jpg
- File:USO Sesame Street Experience Rocks MCAS Yuma 140821-M-NB398-012.jpg
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- On one of these I commented about how the costume was significantly different from the probably copyrighted character. However I don't see the point in having a long debate if there is going to be some doubt. --Fæ (talk) 11:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Derivative works. FoP applies in Chine only to artistic work located or on display in an outdoor public place
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30019742670).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (29685921103).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30019743100).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (29686222494).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30019743280).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30019743630).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30019744160).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30281677586).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30281677806).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30230867421).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30281680496).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30230867531).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30281680556).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30230867641).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (29685926223).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30230869691).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30230870381).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30230872071).jpg
- File:【南投景點】集元果~集集山蕉歷史文化館 (30230872201).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Discasto talk 08:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete These images are from Taiwan where there is no (commercial) FoP for 2-dimensional works at all. De728631 (talk) 14:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 09:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Not sure there's a FoP for such 2-D artworks in Singapore.
- File:Singapore Sentosa beach Mural-01 (23536542004).jpg
- File:Singapore Sentosa beach Mural-02 (23536542114).jpg
- File:Singapore Sentosa beach Mural-03 (23536542184).jpg
- File:Tunnel under Singapore North Bridge Road-1 (23805718610).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- You may want to chip in at User_talk:Fæ#Large_Flickr_upload_request rather than raising piecemeal DRs. For example there may be whole albums I'm uploading that could be skipped with a bit of thought, or speedy deletions may be suitable on certain Flickr tags or Flickr sets without bothering with a DR as part of batch housekeeping. @Ww2censor: --Fæ (talk) 12:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: I agree, these 4 images don't comply with Singapore's FoP rules. I will review the Flickr users images that Fæ is uploading at my request to see if there any obvious upload exclusions that can be made but with 45,000 images it may end up being easier to weed out the few that slip through. At this stage I'm not sure which is better. Ww2censor (talk) 14:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Some of these are probably debatable. For example at some point, does a partial picture of only a small portion of a doll mean that COM:TOY gives way to COM:DM? Then again, would such an image in isolation necessarily be clearly within COM:SCOPE? Quite possible that it would be difficult to determine exactly why such a picture was portraying. But some of these pretty clearly run afoul of TOY, and a toy which is derivative of the cartoon strip by Charles M. Schulz, who didn't die until 2000.
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.50-10).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.50-11).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.50-9).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.50-7).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.50-8).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.50-6).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.50-4).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.50-3).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.50-2).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.50-1).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.51-12).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.51-11).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.51-13).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.51-10).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.51-7).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.51-2).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.51-3).jpg
- File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.51-1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
GMGtalk 14:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_found_with_"AM_2017.117.51", some of this is double DR-ing. --Fæ (talk) 14:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ah. I had looked through the Charlie Brown ones (and some of the others that look like they're based on date of the doll design), but didn't look through the Lucy ones individually other than the thumbnails. GMGtalk 15:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Actually, looking at the sets for File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.40-6).jpg and File:Doll, character (AM 2017.117.41-1).jpg, the creation of the dolls is dated 1980-90s. Is this correct? Ought we maybe pause and look at this batch upload in a little more detail? The Auckland Museum seems to have grouped a lot of things that may not belong. GMGtalk 15:06, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Also the sets for:
- File:Toy, stuffed (AM 2017.117.58-3).jpg - Based on a 1980s children's book series
- File:Doll (AM 2017.117.24-15).jpg - 1976 doll
- (Noddy) Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with intitle:"AM 2017.117.41" --Fæ (talk) 16:28, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- (Non-specific character) Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with intitle:"AM 2017.117.40" --Fæ (talk) 16:37, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- (Mattel doll) Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"aucklandmuseum.com" mattel; it turned out this was the only match for "Mattel" in these uploads. --Fæ (talk) 16:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- GMGtalk 15:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
By the way, DRs are probably unnecessary if this is simple housekeeping of the larger collection. We can instead apply Category:Uploads by Fæ needing speedy deletion where there are very clear copyright claims, such as may be visible on the photographed label for an artefact.
If anyone wishes to see if there is a significant need for housekeeping of likely unnoticed copyvios, it is worth looking at the sub-directories of Category:20th century in Auckland Museum. P.s. potentially NSFW as ladies' lingerie features in the late 20th C. collection. --Fæ (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oh geez. Umm... File:Toy, novelty (AM 1999.164.69).jpg this file. There's a lot of buttons in the 1980s category. There's a lot of books in the 1970s category. More books in the 1960s catgory. There's a bunch of images in the 1950s related to this cartoon. this album.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- I guess it's perfectly possible some of these are allowed under non-renewed registration, but...checking for registration for that many files? GMGtalk 17:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Malta has FOP for "a graphic representation and the making of a photograph or film, of a work of architecture or sculpture or similar works made to be located permanently in public places". Also, how is a sign about a ferry service copyrightable? --Xwejnusgozo (talk) 11:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Posters are generally not covered by FOP. Natuur12 (talk) 17:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Spongebob Squarepants
[edit]Copyrighted character
- File:Leon hot air balloon festival 2010.jpg (and File:Spongebob Squarepants as a balloon.jpg)
- File:Movie Park Germany - Sponge Bob Statute sitting on building façade.jpg
- File:Patrick (6220198352).jpg
- File:Spongebob Squarepants in Kraków 02.JPG
- File:Spongebob Squarepants in Kraków 03.JPG
- File:Wax Museum Plus (6344827249).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep This is a stupid idea, the first of them, was nominated for deletion so many time, but it was kept and reestablished, because it was selected picture of the day, i don't think that it has a cartoon character, it will be deleted, it should be kept for future generations!!! --Duque Santiago (talk) 23:21, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Some of the pictures are FOP cases:
- Keep File:Leon hot air balloon festival 2010.jpg, per previous DRs with broad consensus.
- Delete File:Movie Park Germany - Sponge Bob Statute sitting on building façade.jpg, non permanent statue (no FOP), but need further discussion
Neutral File:Patrick (6220198352).jpg, a cosplay of Patrick the Star. Needs discussion, too- Delete File:Spongebob Squarepants in Kraków 02.JPG, seems more like an advertsing than a permanent statue (notice the Clear Channel logo at the bottom) (no FOP)
- Delete File:Spongebob Squarepants in Kraków 03.JPG, the same as the above (no FOP).
- Keep File:Wax Museum Plus (6344827249).jpg per previous DR, just a wax statue.
- --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:51, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:Leon hot air balloon festival 2010.jpg as this is covered by COM:FOP#Mexico. We have already discussed this multiple times before. Please note that in case of freedom of panorama in Mexico we do not appear to have the requirement of a permanent installation. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:Wax Museum Plus (6344827249).jpg as this is covered by COM:FOP#Ireland. Please note that freedom of panorama in Ireland also includes indoor public places such as museums. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete File:Movie Park Germany - Sponge Bob Statute sitting on building façade.jpg as this appears to be taken within the Movie Park Germany which is not covered by COM:FOP#Germany. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete File:Patrick (6220198352).jpg does not appear to be a permanent installation, thereby not covered by COM:FOP#Australia. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment This should have not been put into one joint deletion request as the individual cases are entirely different. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment No, I don't think so. All of them are exactly the same and I'll explain why I think so:
- The Spongebob character is copyrighted. I assume all of us agree on that.
- Freedom of Panorama is not a big hole through which the copyright vanishes. FoP usually requires several conditions: a) permanent exhibition (that is, we're talking about a permanent element and not a temporal one); b) the owner of the copyright has agreed to such permanent exhibition (otherwise I can buy a poster of, let's say, a famous Robert Capa picture, enlarge, attach it to my costume, go to a parade and country with freedom of panorama and get photographed and voilà!!!, the copyright vanishes.
- None of the provided examples (with the likely exception of the one in the Ireland museum, my mistake) is a permanent element.
- --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:03, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- For File:Leon hot air balloon festival 2010.jpg, see http://anmtv.xpg.uol.com.br/nickelodeon-transforma-bob-esponja-em-balao/ So It is an authorized/intended public placement. It is well clarified in the last DR. Jee 11:24, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Discasto, joint deletion requests like this are not helpful. In case of the photograph of the hot air balloon festival we had three deletion requests before. Nowhere in your deletion rationale you even attempted to refer to the previous discussions. And freedom of panorama depends on the country and the individual circumstances. Mass deletion requests with various legal circumstances are therefore disrupting as there is a danger involved that files get accidently deleted as not sufficient care is taken for each individual case. We had the "big hole" theory already discussed before like here, for example. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:47, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi AFBorchert, I'm not really aware of it since, as you can verify, I've used the 'batch task' tool to nominate the files and, as far as I know, I had no extensive knowledge of past discussions. However, I can't see any 'disruption' here as all the picture share the same issue, regardless of the particular circumstances of each FoP legislation. Now I've read all the DR you mention and I can't find a real compelling argument for keeping the files here. The opposite, I'm afraid.
To sum up, Spongebob Squarepants is a copyrighted character at least in the United States. FoP legislations can tough or relaxed, but the official policies in commons remain: Commons:Licensing. It clearly states that Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. Assuming that your interpretation of FoP in whatever country is correct, it might only mean that the picture is in the public domain in, let's say, Mexico. But the Spongebob Squarepants character keeps on being copyrighted in the United States and the picture keeps on being a derivative work and therefore not in the public domain in the US. Therefore, is not compatible with commons.
Anyway, I agree with you that this discussion goes far beyond this specific DR. Best regards --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 20:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- If it's obviously a copyright infringement in the USA, then it should be deleted. Commons is supposed to be hosting free files, not files where it just happens that a DMCA take-down notice hasn't been received yet. The question here is about "obviously", since there's an argument that maybe a court in the US would honor Mexican FoP (is there any precedent for that?) However I suspect that Wikimedia would immediately take down the file if it received a DMCA take-down request. Also, the DMCA "safe harbor" only applies if the host is "2) not be aware of the presence of infringing material or know any facts or circumstances that would make infringing material apparent, " (from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation_Act) and it seems from this discussion that plenty of people are aware that the copyright in the US is questionable. --ghouston (talk) 21:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Please make yourself familiar with Commons:Requests for comment/Non-US Freedom of Panorama under US copyright law. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:27, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- I would use {{Not-free-US-FOP}} on the FoP images we can keep; that pretty accurately describes our policy for the situation the situation and should help to notify potential re-users. Yes, it's a copyrighted character, but the copyright situation is murky. If you know of a court case precedent which would better inform us, but there is considerable uncertainty about this type of case and what it would mean for U.S. courts, so without that guidance we have basically decided to keep them until better information comes along. Even solely in the U.S., I'm not sure I've seen a photo of someone wearing a costume of a copyrighted character be a problem (or a photo of someone wearing clothing with a copyrighted pattern). People making unauthorized costumes yes, but photographs of daily life -- even when they contain copyrighted material -- get much less clear even without the FoP complication. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:53, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I have speedy kept the first image per previous DRs. The cropped version of it has most of the context deleted and almost solely focussing on the copyrighted character which makes me feel uncomfortable and I would weigh the derivative work of a copyrighted character higher than the FoP excemption. The Wax museum image may be OK, the other nominees are either derivatives, non-permanent or in a non-public location. --Denniss (talk) 11:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- I see no problem with cropped version in case of the hot air balloon festival in Mexico. This is not a case of de minimis but of freedom of panorama with no such known restriction. BTW, I've added {{Not-free-US-FOP}} to the image you speedily kept as suggested by Carl. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment In case of the two photographs from Kraków, we have indeed no permanent installation. See here for a Google Streetview from May 2014 where something else is displayed at the same spot. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:57, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all of the ones which were taken in Europe (Germany, Poland and Ireland). European FOP requires permanent installation, and none of the items seem to be permanently installed. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete --Kopiersperre (talk) 10:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: While I don't agree that the "Wax Museum Plus" file is okay it should have its own DR at least Natuur12 (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Far above com:TOO in the Netherlands. Natuur12 (talk) 23:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Mr. Anton Johan van Vessem (1887 – 1966), NSB politicus en gemachtigde voor rechtskundige aangelegenheden.jpg
[edit],_NSB_politicus_en_gemachtigde_voor_rechtskundige_aangelegenheden.jpg){kind=link}
,_NSB_politicus_en_gemachtigde_voor_rechtskundige_aangelegenheden.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author is not unknown or anonymous. The source states a clear copyrigh Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:21, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- The source states explicitly: Photographer unknown. Research has not turned up an author. Then this image becomes public domain 70 years after publication, according to Dutch copyright law article 38. EU-regulations concur. There is no problem.Hansmuller (talk) 23:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep the source claims clear "© Onbekend" = unknown. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 00:13, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Way to strickt interpertation of the word "anonymous" under Dutch copyrightlaw. Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mein Kampf
[edit]Why is this picture in the public domain?
- File:Advertentie voor Mijn Kamp - Adolf Hitler - Steven Barends - De Amsterdamsche Keurkamer 1939.jpg
- File:Display of Copies of Hitlers Mein Kampf - Documentation Center in Congress Hall - Nuremberg-Nurnberg - Germany.jpg
- File:Mijn kamp - Adolf Hitler - Steven Barends - De Amsterdamsche Keurkamer 1939 (1e druk).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC):
- File:Advertentie voor Mijn Kamp - Adolf Hitler - Steven Barends - De Amsterdamsche Keurkamer 1939.jpg, File:Mijn kamp - Adolf Hitler - Steven Barends - De Amsterdamsche Keurkamer 1939 (1e druk).jpg (third file Display.... is not my upload) because the designer(s) is/are anonymous, now more than 70 years after publication, license is not ok? Hansmuller (talk) 00:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- But is it anonymous, then? There is no evidence of this. Just the fact that no one has bothered searching for the identity of the photographer doesn't mean that the photographer hasn't disclosed his identity. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
No, it isn't. The copyright was apparently held by the Bavarian Ministry of Finance, but it expires this year (see here). Not knowing who make a picture does not mean it's anonymous, I'm afraid. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- The copyright to works by Adolf Hitler expires on 1 January 2016. Hitler wrote the text in the book but probably didn't create the cover. Instead, the copyright status of the cover depends on the cover artist. The page you linked to only talks about the text. If the publisher is unable to use the cover next year, the publisher can always publish the book with a different cover.
- Is this a photograph or a painting? If this is a painting, then the situation is simple: the copyright expires 70 years after the painter, per de:Anonymes Werk (Urheberrecht)#Frühere Rechtslage in Deutschland / Übergangsrecht. On the other hand, if it is a photograph, then there is an added complication: the year of copyright expiration depends on whether the author is anonymous or not. Most photographs of Adolf Hitler are not anonymous. Most photographs were created by Category:Heinrich Hoffmann, so maybe he also created this one? --Stefan4 (talk) 11:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
The similarity between the cover of the Dutch version (File 1,3) and the German original (File 2) is clear. Apparently nobody found the cover artist or photographer who made the German cover since August 2012 (when this file was uploaded to Commons). I also looked up Venema's 5 volume book about Dutch writers in WWII, and found no mention of an artist for the cover of Mijn kamp. I checked approx. 2,000 pictures of Hitler (incl. photographs by Hoffmann) and found no pictures identical to the cover photo. It looks as if both the cover artist and the photographer are anonymous. Vysotsky (talk) 22:09, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep --Fæ (talk) 10:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 10:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Way to strickt interpertation of the word "anonymous" under Dutch copyrightlaw. Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mein Kampf
[edit]Those two were previously kept as "anonymous" works, but they are not. The photo is clearly by Heinrich Hoffmann (who died in 1957), see [10], and still protected in Germany and presumably also the Netherlands, were this book cover + ad were published in 1939. The files can be restored in 2028.
- File:Advertentie voor Mijn Kamp - Adolf Hitler - Steven Barends - De Amsterdamsche Keurkamer 1939.jpg
- File:Mijn kamp - Adolf Hitler - Steven Barends - De Amsterdamsche Keurkamer 1939 (1e druk).jpg
Rosenzweig τ 08:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nomination. Thanks for participating in Deletion Requests and for assuming good faith in my decision. If you disagree, please visit COMMONS:Undeletion requests before you visit my talk page. Thanks and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HanSangYoon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files are not own work, but taken by someone else and either sent to this user, or uploaded through this account (it's a little unclear but see here: [11]). Either way there is insufficient information regarding a proper release of rights and these files should be deleted per COM:PRP. If COM:OTRS comes through they can be undeleted, or this DR can be closed as kept.
- File:Los Angeles Metro, East LA-Civic Center, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Maravilla, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, East LA-Civic Center, Placard View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Maravilla, Placard View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Indiana, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Soto, Upper Floor View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Indiana, Placard View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Indiana, Placard View 2.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Soto, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Mariachi Plaza, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Mariachi Plaza, Lower Floor View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Mariachi Plaza, Upper Floor View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Little Tokyo-Arts District, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Pico-Aliso, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Pico-Aliso, Placard View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Little Tokyo-Arts District, Placard View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Allen, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Sierra Madre Villa, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Sierra Madre Villa, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Lake, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Allen, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Memorial Park, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Lake, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Memorial Park, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Del Mar, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Del Mar, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Fillmore, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Fillmore, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Highland Park, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Highland Park, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Southwest Museum, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Southwest Museum, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Heritage Square, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Heritage Square, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Lincoln-Cypress, Statue.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Lincoln-Cypress, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Lincoln-Cypress, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Chinatown, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Chinatown, Track View.jpg
ColonialGrid (talk) 14:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Also affected are these files which were uploaded to English Wikipedia and transferred to Commons by Epicgenius:
- File:Los Angeles Metro, South Pasadena, Track View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Vermont-Sunset, Upper Floor View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Wilshire-Normandie, Upper Floor View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, North Hollywood, Side Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Pershing Square, Placard Sign.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, South Pasadena, Platform View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Pershing Square, Upper Floor View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, South Pasadena, Station View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Wilshire-Normandie, Platform View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Vermont-Santa Monica, Upper Floor View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Hollywood-Higland, Upper Floor View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Hollywood-Western, Upper Floor View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Hollywood-Western, Lower Floor View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Vermont-Beverly, Platform View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Wilshire-Vermont, Platform View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Wilshire-Vermont, Escalator View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, North Hollywood, Resting Train.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Vermont-Sunset, Platform View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Vermont-Santa Monica, Platform View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Wilshire-Beverly, Lower Floor View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Hollywood-Western, Platform View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Hollywood-Vine, Upper Floor View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Hollywood-Vine, Platform View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Hollywood-Vine, Sign Placard.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, North Hollywood, Upper Floor View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Pershing Square, Lower Floor View.jpg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Westlake-MacArthur Park, Platform View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Vermont-Santa Monica, Lower Floor View to Upper Floor.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Westlake-MacArthur Park, Upper Floor View.jpeg
- File:Los Angeles Metro, Vermont-Sunset, Lower Floor View towards Upper View.jpeg
- I have notified Epicgenius about this discussion. ColonialGrid (talk) 15:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't know they were not the user's own images. In that case, without proper licenses, they can be deleted. Epic Genius (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't expect you to realise. I left a message as it is both courteous and mandated by convention that the uploader the notified of DRs. ColonialGrid (talk) 13:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- If you are going to delete these, the source files and similar ones at Wikipedia should be deleted on the same grounds. That will solve a few problems. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Probably, any files that aren't free (and don't conform to fair use) should be deleted from Wikipedias, but that would be a matter to bring up at Wikipedia. ColonialGrid (talk) 13:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Opposed The entire gold line images are from me by my own hand, and therefore the deletion request for those should be immediately dismissed. As for the red line section and the purple section, I have another batch that I created, so for those, I don't know; I only know that I was given the ownership from the photographers for these. HanSangYoon (talk) 00:15, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Seeing as we don't know which ones are yours and which ones aren't, it would be best for you to mark or list the ones you took, or (and I would prefer this option) follow the procedures at COM:OTRS to certify copyright and the free licence. This has been made much harder by having the EXIF data stripped from all the image (well at least the ones I have properly inspected). Also, please note that being given a file is not the same as owning copyright; copyright generally resides with the creator and is transferred through documentation. You have created a fair mess here by using a single account for multiple people, in future only upload photographs you took yourself. If your friends would like to have their images kept, they should also follow COM:OTRS and send an email releasing them under a free licence. ColonialGrid (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- @ColonialGrid: I believe there was an option during the creating process of the images which lets you select if the picture was created by you, or was given to you. I believe I selected the one that they gave it to me? HanSangYoon (talk) 20:11, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Owning photos does not mean you own copyright. Only the copyright holder can release images under a free licence. ColonialGrid (talk) 04:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't know they were not the user's own images. In that case, without proper licenses, they can be deleted. Epic Genius (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:PRP. If permission is obtained from the copyright holder, then these files can easily be restored. please note that physically owning an image does not confer copyright ownership in the same way that buying a can of Pepsi does not mean that you own the product. Green Giant (talk) 02:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HanSangYoon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size and fuzzy. unlikely to be of much educational use perCOM:EDUSE.
- File:HSY LA Metro 1203.jpg
- File:HSY LA Metro 1111.jpg
- File:HSY LA Metro 1108.jpg
- File:HSY LA Metro 1107.jpg
- File:HSY LA Metro 1106.jpg
- File:HSY LA Metro 1105.jpg
Green Giant (talk) 02:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Coming back for comment soon. Hold up. HanSangYoon (talk) 07:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- No rush, you've got at least seven days and more if necessary. Green Giant (talk) 08:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ColonialGrid (talk) 08:18, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HanSangYoon (talk · contribs)
[edit]These appear to be either crops, of, or taken at the same time as this image [12] (hosted on ENWP). Note the two woman in skirts standing near the escalators and the person in pink sitting between the columns. This raises serious concerns about authorship, the large version on ENWP was uploaded before Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by HanSangYoon indicating the situation to be the same: that these pictures have been created by other people and uploaded by HanSangYoon. I request these photos to also be deleted per COM:PRP.
![[12]](?x=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Los_Angeles_Metro,_Civic_Center,_Upper_Floor_View.jpg){kind=link}
ColonialGrid (talk) 08:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Same situation with this file:
- File:HSY LA Metro 1303.jpg from en:File:Los Angeles Metro, Civic Center, Sign Placard.jpg (note the position of dots on the ceiling)
ColonialGrid (talk) 08:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete if you wish. I've honestly had enough with critics trying to delete my pictures as best as they can, and now I'm sick of it. I've suspended my metro project for that, and now I honestly can care less now. Do whatever you want. HanSangYoon (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- There is no such thing as your metro project. That has been the problem since the beginning, as you tried to impose your will on every other editor who dared to disagree with you. Secondarywaltz (talk) 19:02, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- So you've been thinking my phrase 'My Metro Project' something as a specific thing? I see something wrong with that. It is a mixture of thins that I do, adding pictures and constructing uniformity...let's not talk about this again. My contributing project was being opposed in the beginning for a pitiful excuse of saying that the pictures did nothing to help (which I still disagree and the actions were actually against the Wiki Policy of not reverting images that seemed 'unnecessary'. Eitherways, I see you guys as condemning my explanations...I'm not gonna argue anymore. HanSangYoon (talk) 22:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- I know that it must feel like we (and particularly I at Commons) have come down on you like a ton of bricks. But, my delete requests at Commons have nothing to do with content disputes at ENWP. The reason I am nominating your files for deletion is purely on copyright grounds; you didn't take the photos so do not have the legal authority to release them under a CC licence. I really wish you would stop uploading files that you haven't taken as then I wouldn't be requesting their deletion and inflaming tensions. However, your refusal to accept this and continuation of uploading material you didn't create (including the front cover of books, which have been deleted twice now as copyright violations) continues these DRs. Simply put you need to upload only pictures you actually took of objects you legally can, not photos of copyright objects like books, and not photos other people have taken. Please read COM:LICENSE and COM:DW which address these two issues. You may also like to read COM:FOP and COM:TOO which show what in public may be copyright and how complex something has to be in design to qualify for copyright. If you have any questions please feel free to ask at my talk page, Commons:Help desk, or Commons:Village pump/Copyright. ColonialGrid (talk) 04:46, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- So you've been thinking my phrase 'My Metro Project' something as a specific thing? I see something wrong with that. It is a mixture of thins that I do, adding pictures and constructing uniformity...let's not talk about this again. My contributing project was being opposed in the beginning for a pitiful excuse of saying that the pictures did nothing to help (which I still disagree and the actions were actually against the Wiki Policy of not reverting images that seemed 'unnecessary'. Eitherways, I see you guys as condemning my explanations...I'm not gonna argue anymore. HanSangYoon (talk) 22:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- There is no such thing as your metro project. That has been the problem since the beginning, as you tried to impose your will on every other editor who dared to disagree with you. Secondarywaltz (talk) 19:02, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Informationswiedergutmachung as Speedy (sla) and the most recent rationale was: offensichtlich nicht eigenes werk: andrin schuetz ist nicht christian bolt/ obviously not own work: andrin schuetz bolt is not christian Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Das Werk stammt von Christian Bolt. Das Foto des Werks wurde von Andrin Schütz (Verfasser des Artikels) eingestellt.
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
And also:
Derivative work of copyrighted content (non-utilitarian temporary advertisement). FDMS 4 11:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep the subject is the rolling stock. I think the advertisement is De Minimis. If really this ad is a problem for keeping the picture, it can be blurred, the pictures would still remain interesting because the interesting thing is the rolling stock. Jeriby (talk) 10:45, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- In my opinion, blurring or cropping the copyrighted content would make the images useless (and out of scope, we'd have plenty of better pictures). Also, I think that there are other contextual clues [the advertisement] is the reason for the creation of the file, as very few metro trains in Paris have advertisements on them and therefore the creator could have just waited for the next train. All other applicable no-DM criteria (filename, description, categories) are "fulfilled" as well. FDMS 4 14:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- There can be several subjects in this image, and one of them is the copyrighted advertisement. Anyway, I disagree that "blurring or cropping the copyrighted content would make the images useless": probably, blurring the copyrighted image leaving the train is technically very difficult, or even impossible, but the reason is just technical, not about subject. De Minimis is disqualified when you can't delete the copyrighted stuff because it's the subject.--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- In my opinion, blurring or cropping the copyrighted content would make the images useless (and out of scope, we'd have plenty of better pictures). Also, I think that there are other contextual clues [the advertisement] is the reason for the creation of the file, as very few metro trains in Paris have advertisements on them and therefore the creator could have just waited for the next train. All other applicable no-DM criteria (filename, description, categories) are "fulfilled" as well. FDMS 4 14:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: DM imho Natuur12 (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative work of this cover — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose. This images are works by the same author. --Регион102 (talk) 04:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete There is no clear evidence that the author owns the rights to this image. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Author wrote in his comment that it is 3D-model of city: "это 3D модель города с ночным освещением, свечение на дорогах, шлейфы фар от машин всё это 3D". It is not satellite image, but imitation. --Регион102 (talk) 03:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Historical map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
You are right, Gene, I wrote on historical matter. And if you could read the text I provided, you could easily discover author/date/country. The military map was 98 years old when I augmented it. No one could claim copyright. Sorry for providing only German text, because this map is only useful for the German Wikipedia depending on the historical nammes.--GRIPS (talk) 10:40, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Requested evidence not provided Natuur12 (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work, the author died in 1959. Sealle (talk) 17:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- I fixed the licensing. I'm not sure we really want to keep such a skewed image though. There are better photos of this painting available on the internet. Kaldari (talk) 18:22, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Seems to be a US work which predates 1923 Natuur12 (talk) 18:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fotoprojekt Museum für Kommunikation Frankfurt (supported by Wikimedia Deutschland)
[edit]While these two photos show museum pieces that are certainly historically interesting, they also prominently feature German packaging artwork (see Commons:Derivative works) that could very well still be protected by copyright. Those drawings are detailled and not de minimis or below the threshold of originality. The packaging being from 1925 and 1951 respectively, the artwork is not old enough to be assumed to be in the PD anyway, the artists could well have lived beyond 1944. Unless it is convincingly shown that those drawings are either in the PD or freely licensed, the two files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
Rosenzweig τ 14:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- persue as you wish, the images were uploaded to serve the community. i could as well have used them commercially via dpa/pictureAlliance. so many of my files, especially oggs with interview segments have been deleted in the past, so that i'm reluctant to upload much more these days. extra note: the two images were taken with a small funding by WMDE. Maximilian (talk) 16:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Files of User:Superdiddly
[edit]Sorry, my mistake. I confused the users, no pretensions towards Superdiddly. Taivo (talk) 08:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Files of avda-berlin
[edit]Can you please delete only the first version of these images, uploaded by avda-berlin (not avda):
- File:Lena_Olin_and_Lasse_Hallström_at_the_Berlin_International_Film_Festival_2013.jpg
- File:Jeremy_Irons_-_Berlin_International_Film_Festival_(Berlinale)_-_2013.jpg
- File:Martina_Gedeck_-_Berlinale_-_2013.jpg
- File:Jack_Huston_-_Berlinale_-_2013.jpg
_-_2013.jpg){kind=link}
I accidentally uploaded the image while being logged in to en-wikipedia with avda-berlin. I uploaded the images again with my "real" user avda as a second version of the images. So the first version could be deleted.
--Avda (talk) 06:55, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: done Natuur12 (talk) 18:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
trademark rights 89.54.155.174 23:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- why? --Kleinstein95 (talk) 19:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. A simple loge with a simple design --Katharinaiv (talk) 03:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete No source Stifle (talk) 11:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Below TOO Natuur12 (talk) 18:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 | This file has an incorrect name. Error: Please specify the correctly named image. This file qualifies for speedy deletion.
|
Deleted: Seems to be deleted Natuur12 (talk) 18:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
erratic info Ger Hanssen (talk) 09:33, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 18:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
erratic info Ger Hanssen (talk) 09:33, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 18:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
No OTRS permission has been received though we approached the uploader of the file more than two weeks ago Ldorfman (talk) 00:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- We received comment and the ticket is still in process. -- Geagea (talk) 11:06, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Jcb. JuTa 07:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- [13] Logo spam on Plopsaland de Panne on French Wikipedia. Please delete now.
![[13]](?x=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/fr/a/a4/Plopsaland_de_panne_logo.jpg){kind=link}
82.227.172.214 (talk) 21:53, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Kept: please name the images you with to get deleted. JuTa 07:32, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Gedeone Malagola
[edit]copyright violation [14] Hyju (talk) 23:58, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: image(s) seems to be allready deleted, the empty Category:Gedeone Malagola I deleted now. JuTa 07:34, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
ang pangarap ko sa buhay d makatapos ako ng pag aaral ko patra makatulong ako ng maga pamily la ko? d makatapos ako ng pag aaral ng para makatulong ako ng pamilya ko
Deleted: ???? JuTa 07:34, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I uploaded this image myself. I think that it should be deleted for lack of evidence about its PD status.
[edit]File:Vittorio Emanuele III 1936.jpg --User:G.dallorto (talk) 19:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vittorio Emanuele III 1936.jpg. --JuTa 07:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - An svg version is available at File:Geico_logo.svg which is almost identical. - Nevetsjc (talk) 13:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn by User:Nevetsjc JuTa 07:38, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
too old Gwcstcs (talk) 14:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to delete. JuTa 07:39, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Gdansk Bay Borderlines 1939 English.svg. Classical geographer (talk) 17:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to delete. JuTa 07:41, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
permission missing Imagination0010101 (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: according http://www.bau-berlin.info/nutzungsbedingungen/ we have a permission. JuTa 07:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Another picture with the exact name "Geiselstein.jpg" already exists. I have uploaded this foto again under a new name "Geiselstein im Winter.jpg". The version Geiselstein.jpg should be deleted hence. Ein anderes Bild mit exakt dem selben Namen: Geiselstein.jpg existiert schon. Habe dieses Bild deshalb umbenannt und noch einmal hochgeladen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Octagon (talk • contribs) 2009-07-31T16:09:37 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Túrelio, later recreated with different content. JuTa 07:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I want this speedily deleted. In stead of a picture of ice cream, that it was intended to be, I mis-posted a private photo of my brother. Please delete this ASAP. --JustEase (talk) 20:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Túrelio. JuTa 07:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Nudity 76.20.186.177 00:43, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to delete. JuTa 07:53, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
why you want to delete this picture what is the problem? Hanay (talk) 05:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Kept: there is no problem. JuTa 07:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Overberg hat eine Urheberrechtsverletzung gemeldet, siehe Difflink 1 und Difflink 2. Aber es gibt keinen Grund, eine Urheberrechtsverletzung anzunehmen. Overberg ist vielmehr verärgert über den Verlauf der unter de:Diskussion:Glane (Ems) geführten Diskussion und will die von ihm den Regularien entsprechend veröffentlichte Datei nunmehr nachträglich grundlos zurücknehmen. Wenn man Dateien unter einer freien Lizenz veröffentlicht, muss man sich über die Konsequenzen im Klaren sein! Es gibt keinen Grund, eine Urheberrechtsverletzung anzunehmen. User:Túrelio hat die zwischenzeitlich schnellgelöschte Datei zu Recht wiederhergestellt.
There is no reason to assume a copyright violation. Do not delete this picture.
Watzmann Talk 22:25, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ich habe mit der Veröffentlichung dieses Bildes eine Urheberrechtsverletzung begangen. Daher löschen. --Overberg (talk) 05:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Wenn ich mir die letzten von Dir Overberg hochgeladenen Dateien anschaue, stelle ich fest, dass diese alle mit dem Kameramodell Canon DIGITAL IXUS v2 aufgenommen wurden. Wenn nicht Du, wer ist dann der Urheber? Dann liegt wohl auch bei den anderen Dateien eine Urheberrechtsverletzung vor... --178.10.121.132 07:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Overberg hat die Datei hoch geladen und sich dort als Urheber eingetragen. Solange er nicht nachweist, dass er das Foto nicht selber gemacht hat, solange liegt auch keine Urheberrechtsverletzung vor. Also sollte Overberg seine Behauptung einer begangenen URV belegen. Ansonsten nicht löschen. SteveK (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
delete. The uploader has now expressedly stated that these are not his photos[15]. Even though I still have doubts whether this isn't merely resulting from a quarrel on :de, I think we need to comply with his request. Anyway, neither Wikipedia nor Commons will suffer much from the deletion as the images can easily be re-shot by anybody on holiday in this region. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)- Deutsch: Nach der ausdrücklichen Aussage des Uploaders "Die Photos gehören nicht mir, ich versichere die URV," sehe ich keine Möglichkeit dem Löschverlangen nicht zu entsprechen, selbst wenn ich persönlich immer noch nicht von der Angabe überzeugt bin. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Related requests:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glaner Bach.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Oedingberger Bach.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aa Ostbevern.JPG
- Deutsch: Ein wenig Beweislastumkehr darf man schon verlangen. Einfach URV in den Raum schreien ist ein bischen billig. Overberg schreibt, er könne für die Folgen keine Verantwortung übernehmen. Das ist eine leere Drohung. Es gibt keinen anderen Urheber. Es sind Overbergs eigene Dateien, von ihm hochgeladen und korrekt lizenziert. Nicht löschen!
Watzmann Talk 23:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- English: Only Overbergs one statement "Urheberrechtsverletzung" (= copyright violation) should not justify the deletion of the four pictures. Due to reversal of evidence Overberg should be responsible to proof that he is not the originator. Overberg says, he cannot accept responsibility for the consequences. - An empty thread! There is no other originator than Overberg himself.
Watzmann Talk 23:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Deutsch: Ich habe jetzt etwas zur Aufhellung gefunden: Eine File:Glane07.jpg wurde von User:Sendker am 17.12.2006 hoch geladen, ich habe unter dem Namen noch diese Fotografie gefunden. Warum User:Fastily die Datei am 13. Mai 2012 gelöscht hat [16], obwohl es keinen Grund dafür gibt (nicht benutzte Datei ist kein Löschgrund), bleibt mir ein Rätsel. User:Overberg hat die Datei die Datei am 14. Mai 2013 erneut hoch geladen. Ich schlage deshalb vor File:Glane07.jpg wieder herzustellen und File:Glane.JPG wegen URV zu löschen. SteveK (talk) 09:42, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- English: I have now found something to clarify the situation: A File:Glane07.jpg was uploaded by User: Sendker on 17/12/2006 high, I have found this photography under the name. Why User:Fastily has deleted the file on 13/05/2012 [17], although there is no reason (not used file is not deletion reason), remains a mystery to me. User: Overberg has re-uploaded the file on 14/05/2013. Therefore I propose restoring File:Glane07.jpg and deletion of File:Glane.JPG with cause URV.SteveK (talk) 09:42, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
![[16]](?x=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?page=File:Glane07.jpg){kind=link}
- The case has become even more complicated, as — after I had decided to vote for deletion (see above) — a strong suspicion of sock-puppetting has arised. Now confirmed as sock-puppet of User:Sendker, Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Sendker. --Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
The 2006-upload of a low-resolution version of this photo by User:Sendker, File:Glane07.jpg, has now been restored for forensic reasons. As File:Glane.JPG has higher resolution, I see no need to delete it. Its author-entry should be changed to Sendker, who is obviously the photographer. Thereafter, File:Glane07.jpg might be deleted again as duplicate. Keep for File:Glane.JPG. --Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
I change my vote to Keep for File:Glane.JPG, because the CU has shown that User:Sendker is equal to user:Overberg. So I don't see a copyvio for the photography. SteveK (talk) 13:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Fastily by Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads of User:Overberg batch1. JuTa 08:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Keine Relevanz, löschen Enigma51 (talk) 22:15, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept: well inside project scope. JuTa 08:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
apparent copyright violation, file taken from linked website which indicates no compatibiliy to CC-BY ssr (talk) 11:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Shortly later, I concluded the user could be actually the author of the photo and had placed it at the linked website. Though, the website doesn't state authors name (I couldn't find), so there probability of copyvio remains, but I decided to cancel my nomination. --ssr (talk) 11:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: would need a confirmation through COM:OTRS. JuTa 08:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
replaced by File:Groningen zetelverdeling 2006.png Gouwenaar (talk) 15:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Kept: User:Túrelio deleted the other one. JuTa 08:11, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I personally belive that this file is not suitable. 79.185.23.101 16:04, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Kept: in use. JuTa 08:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
will upload png file Andrius Burlėga (talk) 21:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
There are the same in png format. Andrius Burlėga (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to delete. JuTa 08:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
The "own work" claim appears to be incorrect as at least one of the photographs appears to be taken from elsewhere, see File:A galloping horse and rider. Plate 9 Wellcome L0038065.jpg. That particular photograph is in the public domain because of age, but the fact that the uploader specified an incorrect source for that picture might mean that the uploader also has specified an incorrect source for the other pictures. Stefan4 (talk) 19:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
IsarJoey (talk) 20:13, 9 March 2015 (UTC) states this:
Dear Community of detection of illegal pictures in Wikipedia Commons!
I truly state this about Leo the Horse "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Leo_the_horse.JPG" :
"Leo the Horse" is all my own work using only "Wiki Commons" as written upon the picture:
"Josef Krem March 2014 – Graphics Wikipedia"
The Leo constellation map I got from Leo (constellation) "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_%28constellation%29" using "http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/56/Leo_IAU.svg/833px-Leo_IAU.svg.png".
The galloping horse I copied and reworked from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse#Movement" extracting plate 9 from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Muybridge_race_horse_animated.gif".
The White Horse of Uffington is found in "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uffington_White_Horse" and I adjusted "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Uffington-White-Horse-sat.jpg" to fit into my constellation drawing.
The shape of the White Horse of Uffington I first draw by hand onto a paper copy of the Leo constellation map to check if my view upon Leo at dark spring nights is worth to be drawn detailed.
Then I designed the background picture of Leo the Horse using a Microsoft Word document as my most used documentation editor.
After this the final arrangement of Leo the Horse was easily done to show all important corresponding pictures in one view.
So I'm convinced I did no illegal copying and my picture of Leo the Horse is all my own work using Wiki Commons only.
I added all Wiki Common sources to "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Leo_the_horse.JPG" in Summary to show all picture's origins! IsarJoey (talk) 20:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and that there are no sources in this file other than own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Is there any information enabling to claim that The creator(s) died before 22 August 1980? Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Mostafa Radanipour was killed in Operation Dawn 2 in Iran-Iraq war.this operation was started and finished in 1983.so he was killed more than 30 years ago.so according to {{PD-Iran}} i can use this image.talk
Deleted: As stated in other deletion requestions, "sajed.ir" is a website which doesn't identify photographers. Nothing from that page is attributed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:2011
[edit]Unused personal images of unknown people.
- File:Delouya040711 (1).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (10).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (11).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (12).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (13).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (14).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (15).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (16).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (17).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (18).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (19).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (2).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (20).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (21).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (22).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (24).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (25).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (26).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (27).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (6).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Alan Liefting (talk) 23:34, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: All of these files have OTRS permission. Ask to the OTRS team who are the subjents in these pictures. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- If they turn out to be non-notable people we would have wasted our time. Alan Liefting (talk) 06:15, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
more
- File:Delouya040711 (7).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (8).JPG
- File:Delouya040711 (9).JPG
- File:Delouya040711.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Alan Liefting (talk) 23:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused images of unknown people, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Paulaner beer
[edit]Is there any reason to think that the Paulaner logo is in the public domain?
- File:Kronkorken Paulaner-2008.jpg
- File:Paulander Emblem Biergarten Oktoberfestzelt.JPG
- File:Warsaw (28626471).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 16:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- The Salvator brand was sold commercially from 1799. Paulaner Salvator Thomas Bräu was created as a financial entity in 1928 and they appear to have been using this style of logo for that long (in fact they claim to have been at the Oktoberfest for 100 years). Paulaner is a protected trademark, but I can find no current claim as to copyright. The brewery website has an interactive timeline here. --Fæ (talk) 10:55, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment This page seems to show many different beer labels. If Paulaner is searched, the results only show the current Paulaner logo from early 1960's. Up to then, this or this (larger) seem to be the logo. Therefore, my conclusion is that the current logo is more or less 55 years old. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Although it is possible that the drawing of a man in the logo is old, no evidence is offered here. The logo has been in use only since the 1960s, so it cannot be PD-Old. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
The jewellery piece itself has been released by the creator, however it is composed of a mass of trademarks and logos. Easily identifiable non-text logos which are vigorously protected include Playboy, McDonalds, Disney and Apple. De minimis might be argued, however I believe this would be countered by the fact that the logos are fundamental to the piece and are for that reason a deliberate focus of the image rather than incidental. Fæ (talk) 12:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Fæ. (re opened) Green Giant (talk) 14:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Natuur12: Jee 05:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reopening and sorry for the late responce. Now for the DM-argument. Only a view logo's are copyrighted. We call the MCdonalds logo PD-text for example just like some of they other logo's.
- The only logo's that are copyrighted (like the playboy logo for example) are only a small piece of the jewellery and the focus is the jewellery as a whole. Not the copyrighted logo's.
- Most logo's are hardly recognizable. Even some of the copyrighted.
- For some DR's closed the same way when a part of the object contained copyrighted material see here and here.
- When it comes to Commons:De_minimis#Guidelines. Only the bullet point from other contextual clues (eg by comparison with a series of uploads by the same uploader) X is the reason for the creation of the file. could count but I doubt it. Natuur12 (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- I do not believe this is a liminal case, as mentioned in the nomination the logos are fundamental to the work, the "joke" of bling bling being that it is nothing but logos assembled into one object and therefore the creative part of the object is mostly copyrighted material. If this image is kept, then the deminimis guidelines should adopt this as a case book example as it would change our interpretation of how much of an image can be the focus of copyrighted material and still be kept on Commons under a commercial reuse licence.
- It may be helpful to attract other views and rationales, perhaps a request for participation on the copyright noticeboard? --Fæ (talk) 13:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: We have had several similar prior cases where the entire work was made up of copyrighted magazines, but no single cover was readable. That was kept. In this case, very few of these logos have copyrights -- almost all are PD-textlogo, but both Playboy and Apple stand out as visible and not de minimis, so we must delete it. It's a pity the creator didn't stick to text logos. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:30, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
_-_SS-F%C3%BChrer_-_Bundesarchiv.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_SS-F%C3%BChrer_-_Bundesarchiv.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
If the Bundesarchiv is the source, determine in there the authorship and its copyright status Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
_-_SS-Führer_-_Bundesarchiv.jpg){kind=link}
- That's why the uploader uses the Anonymious Copyright template.--Sanandros (talk) 15:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
There are two important considerations concerning the copyright of this photograph: autorship and date. If the author is unknown and the date before 1945, the photograph falls into the public domain. If not, it's still under copyright. I checked the image database of the Bundesarchiv (and several other databases) but didn't find the photo. That's why I have sent an email to the Bundesarchiv about this photo and asked them about the photographer and the date. As soon as I receive an answer, I will bring it up here, but this might take a few days. Vysotsky (talk) 22:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
_-_SS-Führer_-_Bundesarchiv.jpg){kind=link}
- No answer from the Bundesarchiv as yet. Until further notice: published before 1945, photographer unknown. Vysotsky (talk) 16:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Where did u ask and in which language?--Sanandros (talk) 09:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Via the Bundesarchiv website, in English. The website tells us: Consequently, it may take up to four weeks to process your request. Vysotsky (talk) 11:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
_-_SS-Führer_-_Bundesarchiv.jpg){kind=link}
- Answer received from the Bundesarchiv; sent to OTRS with factual considerations. Vysotsky (talk) 10:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The e-mail from the Bundesarchiv, which Vysotky chose not to share with us here, says that it is not a Bundesarchiv image. That leaves us with a 1944 image with an unknown photographer. Even if "anonymous" applies, and that is unproven here, the German copyright runs for 70 years from publication, not creation, and there is no evidence that this was ever published before it appeared on Defensemedianetwork.com. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
_-_SS-Führer_-_Bundesarchiv.jpg){kind=link}