Commons:Deletion requests/2024/12/07

6 December 2024

8 December 2024

Deletion requests on 7 December 2024

December 7

File:Azadi square (Garage), Kermashan, 2010s.jpg

There is no watermarked attribution on the link provided in the file, and it is required per the {{Tasnim}} license. 1989 (talk) 00:42, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep License clearly states "This image may have previously contained a watermark, which has been removed from the image and its author and source attributed in the file page description instead". Dmartin969 (talk) 03:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no watermark in the link provided, like I said before. No attribution or anything provided. 1989 (talk) 06:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The license also states, "Per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license. See Commons:Where is the license on various sites?#Tasnim. Ratekreel (talk) 11:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as failed license review. Tasnim news doesn't mention any author. Ratekreel (talk) 11:42, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TQ Totalmente Confiable.png

The symbol on the left (which appears to be a fusion of a "t" and a "Q") could be a unique design that may be crossing the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 01:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CELSIA.jpg

The symbol on the left has a non-simple pattern that could be considered a case of COM:TOO. Taichi (talk) 01:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Logo is simple geometry. Dmartin969 (talk) 03:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SIDERPERU 2.jpg

The symbol on the left has a non-simple pattern that could be considered a case of COM:TOO. Taichi (talk) 01:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Logo is simple geometry. Dmartin969 (talk) 03:04, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Singil 1-dong Comunity Service Center 20140606 195126.JPG

Suspected recent building still under architect's copyright. South Korea does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama, making this image an infringement on architect's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 01:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete criteria F2, Commons:FOP South Korea. Dmartin969 (talk) 03:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FoP cases are not eligible for speedy, per the first page you linked, so the tag you added has been removed. 1989 (talk) 06:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo afp capital.jpg

The actual Sura logo maintains a level of complexity that reaches COM:TOO, but has been reduced by the discrete file size. Taichi (talk) 01:14, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AFP Capital Logo.jpg

The actual Sura logo maintains a level of complexity that reaches COM:TOO, but has been reduced by the discrete file size. Taichi (talk) 01:14, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AFP Integra.jpg

The actual Sura logo maintains a level of complexity that reaches COM:TOO, but has been reduced by the discrete file size. Taichi (talk) 01:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AFP Habitat.jpg

The design on the left maintains a level of complexity that could be approaching COM:TOO. Taichi (talk) 01:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SanJose,TarlacChurchjf3945 04.JPG

Recent artwork dated 2012. Infringement of artist's copyright, since there is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 01:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete criteria F1, derivative work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmartin969 (talk • contribs)
FoP cases are not eligible for speedy, per the first page you linked, so the tag you added has been removed. 1989 (talk) 06:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't an FoP case though, it's a straight-up derivative of a copyrighted artwork. Dmartin969 (talk) 07:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe there are places where art inside places accessible to the public is covered by FoP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek @Dmartin969 we still don't have FoP though, and perhaps no FoP introduction before the w:en:19th Congress of the Philippines ends by middle part of next year due to many political issues here at the moment. The likes of w:en:Alice Guo, w:en:Harry Roque's purported escape to Dubai, and the ongoing rift between the President and Vice President of the Philippines. Also, much of support from stakeholders in intellectual property code amendments goes to the bills that solely focus on blocking websites hosting pirated and infringing content (akin to the site blocking provisions of Greek and South Korean copyright laws, with equal site blocking rules applicable to both locally-hosted sites and foreign-hosted sites). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 12:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know. I'm just explaining how this can be considered as a (no-)FoP case. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SanJose,TarlacChurchjf3977 11.JPG

Reverse side of the stained glass artwork nominated here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 01:53, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete criteria F1, derivative work. Dmartin969 (talk) 02:52, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FoP cases are not eligible for speedy, per the first page you linked, so the tag you added has been removed. 1989 (talk) 06:45, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yosh dasturchi oʻzbek yigit.webp

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a young man sitting at a computer desk surrounded by "inspirational quotes" such as "curious in Uzbek, video editing video editing". Omphalographer (talk) 03:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This picture is my work. Please don't insult my work! I did not rob others dishonestly, as you think. I request that you do not delete this image and provide further explanation. Solijon Solayev (talk) 04:28, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Ai-generated nonsense, essentially spam. Dmartin969 (talk) 08:21, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no possible COM:EDUSE. "orc bogging" indeed. Belbury (talk) 09:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 1989 (talk) 19:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bucuresti, Romania, Bustul lui Dimitrie Onciul situat in curtea Cladirii Arhivelor Nationale avand codul B-II-m-B-18690 (3).JPG

The bust was completed in 1926 by Mihai Onofrei (1896–1980). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2051 A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bucuresti, Romania, Bustul lui Dimitrie Onciul situat in curtea Cladirii Arhivelor Nationale avand codul B-II-m-B-18690 (2).JPG

The bust was completed in 1926 by Mihai Onofrei (1896–1980). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2051 A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Bust of Duiliu Zamfirescu (Bucharest)

The bust was completed in 1943 by Alexandru Călinescu (1889–1978). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2049

A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Bust of Nicolae Bălcescu (Bucharest)

The bust was completed in 1943 by Constantin Baraschi (1902–1966). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2037

A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herăstrău - Statuia lui Petofi Sandor (1).JPG

The bust was completed in 1953 by Szobotka András (1916–1992). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2063 A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herăstrău - Statuia lui Petofi Sandor (2).JPG

The bust was completed in 1953 by Szobotka András (1916–1992). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2063 A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Bust of Tamás Borsos

The bust was completed in 2000 by Kiss Levente (1944–). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania, permission from the sculptor is required

A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: Please note that under Law No. 8 of March 14, 1996 on Copyright and Neighboring Rights, the following shall not benefit from the legal protection accorded to copyright: (...) (c) official symbols of the State, public authorities and organizations, such as armorial bearings, seals, flags, emblems, shields, badges and medals. Both Borsos Tamas Marosvasarhely Targu Mures (2).jpg, Borsos Tamas Marosvasarhely Targu Mures (3).jpg represent official symbols of the public authorities, e.g. coat of arms. --Kulja~rowiki (talk) 09:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Bust of Titu Maiorescu (Bucharest)

The bust was completed in 1943 by Ion Dimitriu-Bârlad (1890–1964). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2035

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Bust of Ștefan Octavian Iosif (Bucharest)

The bust was completed in 1943 by Cornel Medrea (1888–1964). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2035

A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Афиша в мемориальном комплексе-музее Салют, Победа.JPG

No FoP for 2D works in Russia, artist Irakli Toidze died in 1985 A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Родина-мать зовёт!.svg

No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I support deletion. More detailed rules and laws: COM:FOP Russia. — Redboston 05:50, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Fat and Thin (sculpture in Taganrog)

The sculpture was completed in 2010 by David Begalov (1951–2013). There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2084

A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Скульптура «Девочка-ныряльщица» «Прыжок в воду» (2).jpg

No FoP for 3D works in Russia, the subject died in 2004 so the sculptor is unlikely to be dead for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not sure where you got the info on the subject from, but this is a sculpture from the 1930s by sculptor Ivan Shadr who died in 1941. See[1] (the relevant text bit is: "1930-е гг. , скульп. И.Д. Шадр"). Nakonana (talk) 17:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Скульптура «Девочка-ныряльщица» «Прыжок в воду», зимой.jpg

No FoP for 3D works in Russia, the subject died in 2004 so the sculptor is unlikely to be dead for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sculptor is Ivan Shadr according to [2]. Shadr died in 1941. The copyright is expired. Nakonana (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Скульптура «Девочка-ныряльщица» «Прыжок в воду».jpg

No FoP for 3D works in Russia, the subject died in 2004 so the sculptor is unlikely to be dead for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sculptor is Ivan Shadr according to [3]. He died in 1941. Nakonana (talk) 17:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Labeled illustration of the human external female genitalia.jpg

Mons pubis and perineum are labeled incorrectly; recommend deletion to prevent presentation of bad info Jtrevor99 (talk) 04:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, too bad. Either edit to fix or delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't found the original image so could not correct it, but agreed - it's a high-quality image, and better than what the associated article currently uses. Editing to correct it would be preferred. Jtrevor99 (talk) 04:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Мемориальная доска писателю Леониду Дьяконову.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Russia, the subject died in 1995 so the creator is unlikely to be dead for 70 years A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dana Italy Photoshoot.jpg

No metadata makes the claim of being the uploader's own work dubious CeltBrowne (talk) 04:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It might, but the problem is that that is not a sufficient reason for deletion, per COM:DR. That doesn't mean an admin might not delete this "per nom," but that's not what COM:DR says. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

* Speedy keep No evidence of copyvio. Dmartin969 (talk) 08:24, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This has been posted elsewhere back in 2019. VRT permission is required. 1989 (talk) 14:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for checking into that. Delete per 1989. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete criteria F1 per 1989. Dmartin969 (talk) 07:21, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Catholic University hospital of Korea

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in South Korea.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Surveying Cheetah II.JPG

No FoP in South Africa, sculptor Dylan Lewis is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:7UP mural (Pune, Maharashtra).jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:7UP mural (Pune, Maharashtra) (cropped).jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Canva logos

Non-free logos: Canva is an Australian company and COM:TOO Australia not OK for most logos

Wcam (talk) 04:21, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:01IMG 7353 (50131758357) blurred.jpg

Useless copy of File:George Floyd protests in Columbus, 2020-07-18 (7353).jpg. Actually I don't understand the meaning of this blurry effect and that's why I'm putting the file up for deletion discussion. איז「Ysa」 • For love letters and other notes 04:56, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pointless and unused edit. Dmartin969 (talk) 08:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:50jahr.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:45, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably above COM:TOO Germany, though it is a simple logo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:52, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Association Sportive des PTT (logo).png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:45, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CLUB DEPORTIVO SANTOS FUTBOL CLUB (VISTA ALEGRE - NASCA).png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:TOO Brazil and COM:TOO US. Presumably relevant per w:Santos FC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:56, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Club-Atletico-Barrio-Norte-.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per COM:TOO Argentina. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DBK Sports.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per COM:TOO Spain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo Sportiva.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo la academia.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo Gualeguay Central.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per COM:TOO Argentina. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo El Progreso.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no COM:TOO Uruguay, so does any Commoner know what their standards are? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo de Urquiza.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per COM:TOO Argentina. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo de Libertad.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:TOO Andean Community, considering the following: "The logo for Lost Enterprises, which incorporated a stylized design of the planet Saturn was created and copyrighted in US (VAU586282), but was ruled below TOO in AC countries per 177-IP-2016 point 6.1 and Casación 1592 by Tribunal of Justice of Peru." This is much simpler than that logo, presumably this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo de Centro Bancario Gualeguay.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo de Carbó.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo Club Velense.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:47, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FC 1904 DAC Dunajská streda logo.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:47, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gezira SC NewCrest ByMòRo.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:47, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gualeguay.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:47, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Itati.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:47, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LA Giltinis.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:47, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Probably under COM:TOO US, don't you think? If not, why not? User:Εὐθυμένης, are you checking which country's COM:TOO is at issue? Please do, before you request deletion. It's a lot of work to check all of these nominations. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luca SC.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:47, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Should be good per COM:TOO India, considering that "India seems to have a similar threshold of originality as the US Courts, called Modicum of Creativity, and this is definitely below COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PoloniaBytom-Herb-2021 Gwiazdka.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pro Romania logo.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 05:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is clearly just a proof, it still has the fiverr watermark. Dmartin969 (talk) 08:28, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:サトニイ宣材写真、赤羽ガード下にて。.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 05:57, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source is given as "Own work," the file is not small, and lack of EXIF is not a deletion reason by itself per COM:DR. So though an admin might delete "per nom," that's not what COM:DR says, and you should give an additional reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Source is listed as own work, no reason to believe that isn't true. Dmartin969 (talk) 08:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There might be a reason, but the deletion requester hasn't given one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:33, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Protest march in response to the Philando Castile shooting blurred.jpg

Useless copy of File:Protest march in response to the Philando Castile shooting (28084964251).jpg. Actually I don't understand the meaning of this blurry effect and that's why I'm putting the file up for deletion discussion. איז「Ysa」 • For love letters and other notes 06:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DC Capitol Storming IMG 7942 blurred.jpg

Useless copy of File:DC Capitol Storming IMG 7942.jpg. Actually I don't understand the meaning of this blurry effect and that's why I'm putting the file up for deletion discussion. איז「Ysa」 • For love letters and other notes 06:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RVA Pro Gun Rally 2020-7 (49418873543) blurred.jpg

Useless copy of File:RVA Pro Gun Rally 2020-7 (49418873543).jpg. Actually I don't understand the meaning of this blurry effect and that's why I'm putting the file up for deletion discussion. איז「Ysa」 • For love letters and other notes 06:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2017.03.04 Pro-Trump Rallies Washington, DC USA 00360 (33211221516) cropped blurred.jpg

Useless copy of File:2017.03.04 Pro-Trump Rallies Washington, DC USA 00360 (33211221516) cropped.jpg. Actually I don't understand the meaning of this blurry effect and that's why I'm putting the file up for deletion discussion. איז「Ysa」 • For love letters and other notes 06:13, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black bloc at RNC running blurred.jpg

Useless copy of File:Black bloc at RNC running.jpg. Actually I don't understand the meaning of this blurry effect and that's why I'm putting the file up for deletion discussion. איז「Ysa」 • For love letters and other notes 06:14, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:7nov1990Mensk e.jpg

The 1990 work is not in the public domain. And it's probably not his work. Incall ^talk 06:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader did not claim that the image is in the public domain. It's licensed as cc-by-sa-3.0. And what's the reason to doubt the own work claim? If the uploader is around 50 years old or older they could have easily taken the photo themselves. Nakonana (talk) 18:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:United nations syria 60733 c0-221-1874-1313 s885x516.jpg

Not own work, no authorisation from source. Incall ^talk 06:21, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koda Kumi for Vogue, 2024.jpg

Not uploaded by copyright owner; screenshot taken from Vogue YouTube video (URL in description) DC-wkm (talk) 06:23, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Video was uploaded to YouTube under CC-BY. Dmartin969 (talk) 08:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Image of Chandigarh Administration.svg

Non-free logo; not suitable for Commons. Also a bitmap traced logo. Turtle-bienhoa (talk) 06:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Better version of the logo is located here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Emblem_of_Chandigarh.svg

This logo is usable on English Wikipedia per fair use and should not be uploaded to Commons. Turtle-bienhoa (talk) 06:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GD 廣東 Guangdong 中山 Zhongshan 沿江東二路 15 Yanjiang East 2nd Road 中山咀香園餅家 Zhongshan JuXiang Yuan Bakery September 2024 R12S 100.jpg

There is no Freedom of panorama for 2D artwork in China. 茅野ふたば (talk) 06:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GD 廣東 Guangdong 中山 Zhongshan tour bus view 火炬發展區 Torch Development Zone 沿江東二路 15 Yanjiang East 2nd Road 咀香園餅家 Zhongshan JuXiang Yuan Bakery September 2024 R12S 09.jpg

There is no Freedom of panorama for 2D artwork in China. 茅野ふたば (talk) 06:52, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GD 廣東 Guangdong 中山 Zhongshan tour bus view 火炬發展區 Torch Development Zone 沿江東二路 15 Yanjiang East 2nd Road 咀香園餅家 Zhongshan JuXiang Yuan Bakery September 2024 R12S 10.jpg

There is no Freedom of panorama for 2D artwork in China. 茅野ふたば (talk) 06:52, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:D vsilk.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 07:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Souvenirs d'Afrique, types indigènes planche 1 Algérie.jpg

Cette image a été copiée du site Benjamin Roubaud https://benjamin-roubaud.fr/album-d-afrique-scenes-de-moeurs-et-de-types-indigenes.html. Elle est de qualité inférieure à l'origoinal et n'est pas associée à la mention du site d'origine la Fondation S.P. Loya. Je propose de la remplacer par l'image originale pour laquelle j'ai acquis le droit de reproduction auprès de la fondation Debarray (talk) 07:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep published more than 120 years ago. Dmartin969 (talk) 08:40, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diary milk silk.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 07:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dairy milk ,bubbly.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 07:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TW TP 台北 Taipei 華山市場 HauShan Market Food Court 阜杭豆浆店 Fu Hang Soy Milk Congee Breakfast shop March 2024 R12S 125.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 07:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TW TP 台北 Taipei 華山市場 HauShan Market Food Court 阜杭豆浆店 Fu Hang Soy Milk Congee Breakfast shop March 2024 R12S 111.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 07:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TW TP 台北 Taipei 華山市場 HauShan Market Food Court 阜杭豆浆店 Fu Hang Soy Milk Congee Breakfast shop March 2024 R12S 109.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 07:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dolomitenkönig.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 07:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chagee milk tea.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 07:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hard Keep: This image is not merely an image of the printed design. Instead, it’s a photograph of a person holding an actual Chagee milk tea cup, which happens to have a print on it. It would be very difficult for a graphic designer to somehow turn this image into a usable copy of the packaging design without putting in a lot of manual labor.Notice how the backside of the packaging is invisible, and it also has a sticker overlaying it from the left side. For this reason, I believe this image should be kept. It’s also just a helpful photo that depicts what Chagee sells. Amin (talk) 05:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bunnies in a Basket (Where toys go to die).jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 07:33, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arguably de minimis, as we see a bunch of toys rather than clearly seeing any individual toy. I think it's OK, but the closing admin may disagree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Concure with Ikan Kekek that this is probably de minimis, no full toy is even visible. Dmartin969 (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Contec, Cyclingworld Europe 2024, Meerbusch (P1170780).jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 07:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Toy is De Minimis, barely part of the image and certainly not the focus. Dmartin969 (talk) 08:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daugavpils, Latvia - panoramio (89).jpg

The sculpture was completed in 2007 by Alexandr Taratinov (1956–). There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia, permission from the sculptor is required A1Cafel (talk) 07:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panevėžys Landmarks 13.jpg

The sculpture was completed in 2007 by Dobičinas Igoris (1962–). There is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania, permission from the sculptor is required A1Cafel (talk) 07:56, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FOP Lithuania states that "the provisions of Art.28.1.1 shall not be applied when a work of architecture or a sculpture is the main subject of representation in the reproduction, and when this is done for direct or indirect commercial advantage." Please remove this deletion request which fails both of these tests as the sculpture in the foreground is in the shade and barely visible and also this silhouette could not rationally be exploited by anyone, including the author, for commercial advantage. (Will note the artist information in the image description.) SM:!) (talk) 12:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete IMO this is no incidental inclusion as mentioned in Template:NoFoP-Lithuania. --Rosenzweig τ 22:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panevėžys Landmarks 08.jpg

The sculpture was completed in 1989 by Kazlauskas Romanas (1937–2021). There is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2092 A1Cafel (talk) 08:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FOP Lithuania states that "the provisions of Art.28.1.1 shall not be applied when a work of architecture or a sculpture is the main subject of representation in the reproduction, and when this is done for direct or indirect commercial advantage." Please remove this deletion request which fails both of these tests as the sculpture in the foreground is not in focus and merged into the trees behind and also this shadowy image could not rationally be exploited by anyone, including the author, for commercial advantage. (Have noted the artist information, which I thank you for providing, in the image description.) SM:!) (talk) 12:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC) SM:!) (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete IMO this is no incidental inclusion as mentioned in Template:NoFoP-Lithuania. --Rosenzweig τ 22:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panevėžys Landmarks 09.jpg

The sculpture was completed in 1982 by Pajuodis Alfridas (1956–). There is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania, permission from the sculptor is required A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FOP Lithuania states that "the provisions of Art.28.1.1 shall not be applied when a work of architecture or a sculpture is the main subject of representation in the reproduction, and when this is done for direct or indirect commercial advantage." Please remove this deletion request which fails both of these tests as the sculpture to the right of the image is not in focus and also this outline image could not rationally be exploited by anyone, including the author, for commercial advantage. (Have noted the artist information, which I thank you for providing, in the image description.) SM:!) (talk) 14:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete IMO this is no incidental inclusion as mentioned in Template:NoFoP-Lithuania. --Rosenzweig τ 22:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harbour And Harpa (32966979063).jpg

The building was completed in 2011 by Olafur Eliasson (1967–). There is no freedom of panorama in Iceland, permission from the architect is required A1Cafel (talk) 08:13, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tipico Chow Chow nero.jpg

Low res image, without an EXIF and almost squared. TinEye also gives a match from 2016, unfortunately from a deleted website. --Mannivu · ✉ 08:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete FBMD. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:34, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Śvetabaniyāna (Category:Yuen-Ji)

COM:SCOPE, personal logo of an artist who does not exist. --Thyj (talk) 08:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: She asked the whole network to delete all information about her. --Thyj (talk) 08:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:04, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:April 2008 Paris -94621.jpeg

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Uli@wiki (talk) 09:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uli@wiki:The picture shows a style of architecture, it is usable. Syced (talk) 15:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the wording is not mine but by the wikicommons app.I actually find that wording impolite but I could not change it. The app also ask to suggest if for deletion, not the request (which I think is stronger). I don't think the picture is "nonsense" but the app specifies asks if the picture could be used in an article. Without any further information I do not see how this could be done with this picture and which information one could retrieve from it. It is not categorized with any specific architecural style (beyond being Category:Paris). Hence my proposal for deletion. Uli@wiki (talk) 11:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you believe COM:SCOPE is much narrower than it really is. Have you been under the impression that Commons serves only as a repository of likely thumbnails for Wikipedia? Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:22, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Nonsense DR. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:April 2008 Paris -57234.jpeg

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Uli@wiki (talk) 09:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense DR. Keep unless there's some kind of COM:DW problem (I doubt there is). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:37, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castelo Rodrigo tapa.jpg

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Uli@wiki (talk) 09:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Nonsense DR. This user is wasting our time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Óscar Míguez y Pelé.png

Óscar Míguez died in 2006, so the photo could not have been taken in 2024. Origin and license unclear. Graf Foto (talk) 09:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plantel Campeón Uruguayo 1958..jpg

The photo is from 1958, so it cannot have been taken in 2022. Origin and license unclear. Graf Foto (talk) 09:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sam-houston-st logo from NCAA.svg

After consultation at the village pump, I decided to nominate the logo so the claw figure could be above the TOO. Fma12 (talk) 09:36, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Revista Renacer N.º 2 1938 Hitler.jpg

Drawing published as the cover of a Spanish magazine in 1939. It has a signature so, it cannot be considered anonymous. The author is not specify in the file, so it might be in its country of origin (up to 1987 protection was 80 years pma), but it won't be in the US due to URAA. The CC-BY probably comes from the BNE terms and condition [4], but it is only applicable to works in the public domain «Por tanto, y salvo que se especifique expresamente lo contrario, las imágenes en dominio público que se encuentren en el dominio bne.es están bajo una licencia de Reconocimiento CC-BY 4.0 o equivalente.». Günther Frager (talk) 10:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per [5], the illustrator signing as Guillermo was Guillermo Pérez Baylo (1911–2000). The file can be restored in 2071. --Rosenzweig τ 22:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xuncos.jpg

Cover of an Spanish magazine. Günther Frager (talk) 10:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lu y Ngò.jpg

Because it is not useful in providing information. It used to be linked to the Lu y phan van ngo page on viwiki, but the page was quickly deleted because it was a test page. Cát trắng (talk) 10:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti in Rajshahi after July revolution capture by Manik 30.jpg

There is no FOP for 2D artworks (like Graffiti) in Bangladesh, this file has no place on Commons Poco a poco (talk) 10:38, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep see this Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2024/09#Bangladesh 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What about it? Per discussion on that thread, there may be no FoP at all in Bangladesh. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:40, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti in Rajshahi after July revolution capture by Manik 02.jpg

There is no FOP for 2D artworks (like Graffiti) in Bangladesh, this file has no place on Commons Poco a poco (talk) 10:38, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info COM:FOP Bangladesh --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep see this Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2024/09#Bangladesh 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So it apparently must be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:臺灣電力株式會社社長宿舍 6691.jpg

Better version: File:臺灣電力株式會社社長宿舍6692.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 10:56, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GD 廣東 ZS 中山市 Zhongshan 中山五路 Zhongshan 5th Road 東區 Dong District ZhongShan Customs bus stop sign evening July 2024 R12S 01.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted screen 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GD 廣東 ZS 中山市 Zhongshan 中山博覽中心 waiting room books 深圳寶安國際機場中山航空港 Shenzhen BaoAn Airport - Zhongshan Terminal July 2024 R12S 06.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted image 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GD 廣東 ZS 中山市 Zhongshan 深圳 Shenzhen InterCity Hub 巴士站 bus Terminus July 2024 R12S 09.jpg

There is no Freedom of panorama for 2D poster in China. 茅野ふたば (talk) 11:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruben Selles.jpg

Blatant copyright violation, see professional quality. Exact image is syndicated here [6] and credited to Marc Atkins of Getty Images Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MossiMousso

User:MossiMousso has already uploaded many copyighted files in the past (see his talk page). Some of his new uploads are questionnable as well (with some obvious copyvios here again). --Titlutin (talk) 23:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files for which the author is indicated as being "Detlef Koennecker" (copyright: "mediendr.de") in the metadata (exif). No proof MossiMousso is indeed this person:

File for which the author is indicated as being "ADAMA NANA" in the exif. No proof MossiMousso is indeed this person:

File:Gisèle Gumedzoe Ouédraogo.jpg

Other files which are plain copyvios taken on the internet:

File:Emma Marie Blanche Kantiono.jpg : Published since October 2024 on this Facebook page
File:Ada Yaya Bocoum.jpg : Published 3 months ago on this person's LinkedIn profile

Other files for which I couldn't find something online and for which there's no name written in the exif, but which I strongly suspect to be copyvios as well, considering this user's past history. Most of them seem professionally made, but have no exif at all, which is suspicious in itself if MossiMousso is indeed the photographer:

File:Wendyam Micheline Kaboré.jpg (no exif)
File:Habi Ouattara.jpg
File:Sophia Kangambega.jpg (no exif)
File:Hélène Daross Ouédraogo.jpg (no exif)
File:Désirée Aimée KI-ZERBO.jpg (no exif)
File:Ouédraogo Hélène Daross.jpg (no exif)

Files uploaded by MossiMousso (talk · contribs) 2

More probable copyvios, given the block of the user and the first section of this page.

— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Pictures made with a smartphone are most probably her own work, and can be kept. For the rest, we need a permission from the copyright holder. Yann (talk) 16:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trafalgar Square 2022 vc.jpg

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:'The End' on The Fourth Plinth, Trafalgar Square.jpg and the note at Category:Fourth plinth, Trafalgar Square, sculptures on this site are temporary so COM:FOP UK does not apply. Belbury (talk) 11:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ciairo.jpg

low quality, uncategorized photograph of a picture on a smartphone Ivanbranco (talk) 12:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Judith Forest.png

I removed this from the article . AI image created to illustrate a hoax author, but there is absolutely no relation between the prompt and the subject of the article. Any random image of a woman would be equally [in]accurate. This is outside of COM:SCOPE. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 12:33, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Squirrel Conspiracy,

the picture used for the Judith Forest portrait is not a picture generated by AI, but a picture traited by AI, as explained when uploading the picture in WikiMedia.

This picture is based on the picture of the comedian who played Judith Forest on television (Arte (vimeo.com/la5ecouche/1h25-arte) and France 3 (vimeo.com/la5ecouche/1h25-fr3). This picture is used for years as a profile picture on Forest Facebook (facebook.com/judithforest).

You do as you wish, but it is not an arbitrary picture.

Best,

William William Henne (talk) 13:21, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's in scope as an illustration of a specific actress who was apparently part of the hoax, now that the uploader has told us this.

Is it COM:DERIV, though, if the uploader took a specific copyrighted television news clip (or a selected frame from it, or a different photograph of her?) and asked an AI to redraw the person in an "18th century portrait" style? Belbury (talk) 19:24, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Souleymane Diebate .jpg

unused, uncategorized personal picture of non-contributor Ivanbranco (talk) 12:42, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nicole Luisoni (52524729432).jpg

The person in the photo is no longer a model and wants to delete all trace of such role, as it is impacting her personal life. Anyulrivas (talk) 12:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep First, the photographer and flickr user licensed this photos as CC-BY 2.0 (the "authorisation of the photographer"), attested by flickreview, so, no, this photos are freely licensed, as CC licenses are irrevocable, and so the photographer can stop distributing them, but cannot stop others, that have used them under that license, from keep them in "public domain" (not public domain by CC but the argument stands). This photos were made in a nude photography workshop in Barcelona ("Taller de fotografía de desnudo, Barcelona" in spanish), made with a nude photography model, as per this context. Second, this is a case of a model posing, willingly to a workshop of nude photography, not of some sneaky photographer. Also, keep before per Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/06/19#Files_in_Category:Nicole_Luisoni. As i already said in Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Nicole Luisoni, if it is having such an impact on a model life, then, maybe, the original photographer shouldnt have slapped the name and (possibly other data) about the model, in the first place. Yet, if it is really having an impact, that could be easily solved by changing the filenames of this model photos to something non personal, albeit keeping that info that this photos were taking by a boudoir photographer (the name of the photographer? and were taking during a nude photography workshop in Barcelona ("Taller de fotografía de desnudo, Barcelona" in spanish). Tm (talk) 12:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all of Category:Nicole Luisoni and its content. Wikidata too.

It seems credible that the model here has retired and they are trying to remove their footprint of images. Yes, the licensing here is irrevocable and so Commons is entitled to continue to host these. However that is not the same as Commons being required to host them. Nor is it part of Commons' role to be needlessly vindictive to any model.

Removing these entirely from the web is unlikely to be successful and certainly not easy. But it's not our job to make it any harder. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A better solution, as the deletion requester as already agreed with above, given that the CC licenses are irrevocable and this files were all kept previously per Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/06/19#Files_in_Category:Nicole_Luisoni, as i said above, if it is really having an impact, could be easily solved by changing the filenames of this model photos to something non personal, albeit keeping that info that this photos were taking by a boudoir photographer (the name of the photographer? and were taking during a nude photography workshop in Barcelona ("Taller de fotografía de desnudo, Barcelona" in spanish). The category in Commons and renaming to anonymised filenames can be processed easily but the Wikidata item would need a separate, on Wikidata, process. Tm (talk) 17:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see no way in which that would be 'better'. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per the comments of the user (that says to be the photographer and ergo the copyright holder" that opened this same deletion request, in Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Nicole Luisoni where he said "Thank you for your consideration. I'll modify the filename so the model name no longer appears there. Some models prefer to use an alias, and others prefer to use their real name. This is the first time this happened to me with all the models I worked with so far. I have no problem with keeping the photographer info and the context they were taken.", i.e. the filens can be kept and the filenames changed to anonimized filenames, altough i said that he shouldnt do that, and let others, after the closure do that, specially given that the Wikidata item involves a different and separate process in Wikidata itself, not here. Tm (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm somewhat sympathetic to a model who wants to retire, but the fact is, she can retire by stopping working like anyone else. If she had posed nude for paintings, would you call for their destruction or try to tell the artist to rename the compositions? People who model for publication know that the images are forever. Changing the filenames to deemphasize the identity of the model is more than generous. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:C2002 V1 (NEAT) from SOHO-LASCO on 2003-02-18.jpg

SOHO is a joint NASA-ESA mission, so PD-NASA doesn't apply. Unfortunately SOHO's images copyright status continous to be vague as fas as commercial use is concerned [7] and previous discussion's of SOHO's image resulted in the deletion of them (eg. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SOHO images). C messier (talk) 12:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Githa.jpg

COM:PERSONAL and not Git-related 2400:4053:9480:7200:3A59:B8FE:9FD0:51DF 12:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abbasid al-Rashid Flag.svg

Per COM:EDU: fictional/ahistorical flag of a historical state and ruler Constantine ✍ 13:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abbasid al-Maumun Flag.svg

Per COM:EDU: fictional/ahistorical flag of a historical state and ruler Constantine ✍ 13:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motherboard manual (1315607814).jpg

copyrighted motherboard manual. Solomon203 (talk) 13:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't see anything above the threshold of originality in this picture. - Jmabel ! talk 17:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Me neither. What do you think could be above COM:TOO US, User:Solomon203? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:49, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ASUS VL/ISA-486SV2 motherboard manual. Solomon203 (talk) 11:02, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In other words, you think the entire motherboard design could be above Com:TOO US. Could you explain more specifically how it's more complex than the examples on that page of designs that were found by the U.S. government not to be copyrightable? Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Klaasohm.jpg

The original uploader S.schwarz wiki is probably not the photographer G.Meyer. Missing permission. Didym (talk) 13:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was für ein unnötiger LA. Das Bild ist seit 16 Jahren im Artikel, der Uploader hat vermutlich nicht besser zu beschreiben gewusst und nichts wird durch eine Löschung gewonnen, oder verbessert und einen wirtschaftlichen Wert, der den Urheber benachteiligen könnte hat das Werk nun auch nicht. Da gibt es im Internet bessere. Itti (talk) 15:39, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Die Tatsache, dass das Problem bisher niemand aufgefallen ist, ändert nichts daran, dass auch zum Hochladezeitpunkt schon eine Freigabe erforderlich gewesen wäre. Sonderregeln würden nur für vor 2007 hochgeladene Dateien gelten, also hier nicht. --Didym (talk) 23:23, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

aha, 2008 ist demzufolge zu neu? Der User hat auch noch http://www.insel-fotos.de/html/klaasohm.html in einem Edit als in der Zusammenfassungszeile angegeben. Leider ist das Archiv unvollständig, ich sehe nur eine weiße Seite. Licht ins Dunkel werden wir da nicht bekommen, ob es auch auf der Website schon Public Domain war. Nach so langer Zeit ist eine Freigabe höchst unwahrscheinlich, damit wird hier effektiv Wissen gelöscht. --ɱ

00:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im Archiv der Website lässt sich nachlesen, dass die dortigen Bilder "frei für Privat und Presse" wären. Ist natürlich völlig schwammig, aber es passt zur Webseite und zu den Bildern. Das sind einfache, qualitativ schlechte Bilder, die jedoch einen dokumentarischen Wert haben. Das Letzte, was solch ein Uploader möchte, ist eine Löschung. Die wäre völlig unangemessen und entspricht da nur einer Eitelkeit. Itti (talk) 09:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

behalten: Das Bild wurde 2008 mit Nennung eines Urhebers, der eine "private Bildaufnahme" zur freien Verwendung ins Internet geladen hatte, vom Wikipedia-Account S.schwarz in die de.wikipedia übernommen. Der Benutzer S.schwarz ist ansonsten in der Wikipedia nicht in Erscheinung getreten. Für mich folgt daraus, dass S.schwarz eine Wikipedia-Lücke in der Dokumentation des Klaasohm-Brauchs wahrgenommen hat und gemäß Sei mutig gehandelt hat. Gemäß Sei mutig sollen wir alle aber auch tolerant sein!
Warum soll ich dann bei einem Bild, dass über 15 Jahre als freigegebenes Bild in der WP und bei Commons eingestellt und akzeptiert war, im 16. Jahr das Wikipedia-Prinzip Geh von guten Absichten aus – das auf dem Grundsatz von Treu und Glauben – beruht, über den Haufen werfen, obwohl es außer der formalen Reklamation von Didym, die mit rund 15 Jahren Verspätung kommt, nichts am Bild auszusetzen gibt? Um das Bild zu löschen, sind aus meiner Sicht seriöse Fakten vorzulegen, dass S.schwarz und/oder G.Meyer nicht in freier Entscheidung das Bild freigegeben haben oder dass die Namen von anderen zur Lizenzerschleichung frei erfunden wurden. Liebe Grüße --Michael (talk) 13:37, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Behalten. Aus den obendrüber angegebenen Gründen, die auch mir plausibel erscheinen, sehe ich eine potenzielle URV nicht als gegeben – zumal das Bild seit bereits 15 Jahren unbeanstandet verwendet wird. Zusätzlich anzumerken ist, dass das Foto ein derzeit zentral in der Diskussion befindliches Thema illustriert und es zu dem dargestellten Brauch kein freies Ersatzfoto gibt. (Falls möglich, wäre es nicht schlecht, wenn eines der Medien, die dieses Jahr zahlreich von vor Ort berichtet haben, eines oder mehrere aussagekräftige Bilder unter einer freien Lizenz zur Verfügung stellen.) --Zietz (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sehe ich auch so. Behalten. Gert Lauken (talk) 18:12, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Behalten. Moin in die Runde. Vielen Dank für die Diskussionsbeiträge zum Klaasohm-Bild. Ich bin ebenfalls der Ansicht, dass das Bild behalten werden sollte. Denn gemäß den Grundprinzipien von Wikimedia Commons und der Wikipedia, wo das Bild ja ursprünglich hochgeladen wurde, gehen wir von guten Absichten der Benutzer aus, sofern es keine konkreten Beweise für eine Urheberrechtsverletzung gibt. Der Uploader hat offensichtlich angegeben, dass das Bild unter einer freien Lizenz steht, und hat es zudem mit einer entsprechenden Beschreibung hochgeladen. Es gibt bisher keinen belastbaren Beleg, dass die Rechteangabe des Uploaders falsch ist. Zudem ist der Upload in der .de/wikipedia ja schon vor Jahren erfolgt (und das Bild laut Beschreibung ja vom 05.-06.12.1999 ist) ist. In diesem langen Zeitraum ist es in vielen Artikeln genutzt worden, die zum Teil hohe Abrufzahlen haben (Zum Beispiel der Borkum-Artikel und der Ostfriesland Artikel. Der Klaasohm-Artikel hatte vor der Berichterstattung eher wenige Aufrufe). Und bisher haben weder der mutmaßliche Urheber noch sonstwer das Bild als problematisch gemeldet hat. Dies legt mMn nahe, dass der tatsächliche Rechteinhaber entweder mit der Veröffentlichung einverstanden ist oder keine Ansprüche erhebt. Und das mehreren tausend Aufrufen nur des Klaasohm-Artikels. Es gibt daher für mich keine Hinweise darauf, dass das Bild unerlaubt veröffentlicht wurde. Der Löschantrag basiert auf der Annahme, dass der Uploader und Fotograf möglicherweise nicht identisch sind, ohne konkrete Beweise dafür vorzulegen. Das ist möglich, muss aber gar nicht so sein. Denn wir haben ja hier freie Namenswahl. Allein der Zweifel an der Identität des Uploaders reicht mMn jedoch nicht aus, um die Löschung zu rechtfertigen, insbesondere wenn keine Urheberrechtsverletzung belegt wurde. in den vergangenen Tagen ist das Eine Löschung sollte nur erfolgen, wenn ausreichend Beweise für eine Verletzung vorliegen. Der Artikel hat derzeit viel Aufmerksamkeit. Das Bild ist das einzige, was wir vom Brauch selbst haben. Für mich ist der Nutzen für die Allgemeinheit deutlich höher zu bewerten als der potenziellen Schaden, zumal keine Beschwerde durch einen Rechteinhaber vorliegt. Daher unbedingt behalten. Gruß Matthias Süßen (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, für einen Otto-Normal-Wikipedianer, der mal eben auf die Insel fährt, um solch einen Moment festzuhalten, ist es kaum möglich, in eine so günstige Position zu gelangen, aus der er ein so übersichtliches Bild von oben schießen kann. Dass zudem mit den noch beschränkten, technischen Möglichen des Jahres 1999, in dem das Foto entstanden ist, ein so günstiger Bruchteil der Fall-Sekunde getroffen wird, erhöht den Wert des Bildes nochmals. Man kann beim Ansehen des Bildes den Prozess des Fallens spüren. Nicht zuletzt zeigen die in der letzten Zeit veröffentlichten Dokumentationen, wie schwierig es selbst für professionelle Reporter ist, überhaupt Bilder von Klaasohm zu machen. Ich kann mich an kein Bild in der Presse erinnern, dass nur annähernd so genial diesen Moment wiedergibt, wie dieses. Dass hier trotzdem unter Umschiffung dieser drei Probleme ein solches Bild zustande kommen konnte, ist fast unglaublich aber wahr. Selbst für viele derjenigen Borkumer, die den Brauch des Klaasohms geheim halten möchten, könnte ich mir vorstellen, dass so ein geniales Bild in der Öffentlichkeit akzeptabel wäre. Es zeigt ja eines der weniger umstrittenen Rituale der Veranstaltung. Das alles verleiht dem Bild einen extrem hohen dokumentatorischen Wert und somit Nutzen für die Allgemeinheit. Dies sollte bei der im Vorposting beschriebenen Abwägung gegen andere ideelle Werte berücksichtigt werden. -....- Am Rande bleibt für mich festzuhalten, dass der Klaasohm Artikel schon zwei Jahre nach Gründung der deutschen Wikipedia in der Version vor 20 Jahren zwar weniger professionell als heute das Schlagen junger Frauen thematisiert hat. -- Tirkon (talk) 14:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it. Yes the image show a rare moment and yes it would be hard to replace it. But that doesn’t matter. There is no AGF in copyright. We need a permission from the photograf, because there is no exception like freedom of panorama for this picture. And because it is very unlike to receive that a permission we have to delete it. (for the non-german-speaking users who wonder what is this all about: There was a little bit of a scandal about an old and privy tradition in Borkum and this picture shows a (non-problematic) part of this tradition). --DaB. (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What about the archived version of the source website that stated that the images are "frei für Privat und Presse" ("free for private and press")? Nakonana (talk) 19:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DaB., Im Support ist eine massive Beschwerde, ein Fotograf ist einfach auf eine private Wiese gegangen, um ein Haus zu fotografieren. Als er angesprochen wurde, ist er ins Auto gestiegen und schnell weggefahren. Du könntest dir mal das Ticket ansehen und da die Bilder löschen, die nun wirklich rechtswidrig sind. Evt. auch mal den Fotografen ansprechen, damit solches nicht erneut passiert. Hier jedoch wird mit wenig Augenmaß argumentiert. Wer etwas auf seine private Webseite mit "frei für privat und Presse" setzt, hat nichts gegen die Verwendung. Itti (talk) 06:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Private" implies a license that includes "Non Commercial"= "NC". This is ensured by "CC BY NC". Press is commercial and relativizes the "NC". Since “BY” was never required, this can also be dropped. So what remains is "Free"= "CC0". -- 22:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Wiki for SAFEM 2024 du 29 Juillet 46.jpg

Because it is totally blurry Rohit Sharma (talk) 13:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiki for SAFEM 2024 du 29 Juillet 53.jpg

Because it is totally blurry Rohit Sharma (talk) 13:33, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Federica Lombardi in 2021 (Photo credit- Charl Marais).jpg

possible copyvio Charl Marais Lutheraner (talk) 13:56, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:6.-szacila.jpg

1935 photo is not own work. Real source, real author and real license are needed. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Емблема Конгресу Українських Націоналістів з державним тризубом.svg

COM:UKRAINE does not mention TOO, so the original may have been copyrighted, per COM:PCP. As far as I know, recreating a logo is creation of a derivative work, and therefore is not allowed if the original is copyrighted. Note that the English version of {{PD-UA-Exempt}} says that symbols of organizations are PD; however, the Ukrainian version, which is more up-to-date, does not mention organizational symbols (at least a machine translation of it; I don't speak Ukrainian). Janhrach (talk) 14:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do political parties not count as political authorities? Nakonana (talk) 19:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists.svg

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Емблема Конгресу Українських Націоналістів з державним тризубом.svg. Janhrach (talk) 14:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Yoanyoanomoto (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you actually do a web search on all of these?

Keep File:LOVELAB.png per w:Love Lab and COM:TOO Japan.

Delete the other 2 per COM:SCOPE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:56, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Swagato Show (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Poffor1 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Asia hawk (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:صورة شخصية للسيد احمد حاتم.jpg might be of some use if we could identify the location and there isn't a better photo without a person taking up so much of the picture frame. Failing that, both files should indeed be

Deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donegal Fairy Stories (1915).djvu

A concern about the copyright of this work was raised at s:Wikisource:Copyright_discussions#Index:Donegal Fairy Stories (1915).djvu. As it is quite difficult to summarize the Wikisource discussion, I suggest to have a look at the link instead. Note: If it is decided to delete the work in Commons, it should be first moved to English Wikisource, as it is clearly in the Public Domain in the US. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 15:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cykl pracy materaca przeciwodleżynowego.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Al Amin Kouser (talk · contribs)

Personal artwork, COM:NOTHOST.

Sinigh (talk) 15:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cynthia Headshot.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Reformed Government of the Republic of China (2-3).svg

completely fictional flag, previously overwritten and/or deleted NorthTension (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021-11-14 龍泉寺初詣切り絵御朱印.jpg

Per COM:DW Yasu (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Smaller copy at [8]. Yann (talk) 16:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schloss - 01.tif

possible copyvio © Michael Schultz - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:24, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Girl on top sex.webm

contenu pornographique explicite 82.120.229.176 08:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Not a valid reason--Trade (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Dronebogus (talk) 16:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Girl on top sex.webm

Pornographic content without educativ purpose 80.146.8.244 09:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Not a valid reason. Definitely educational (and we don't have many of these) --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Dronebogus (talk) 19:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Girl on top sex.webm

Work of Aaronson Andrew, not 'own work'. 2607:F140:8801:0:0:0:1:25 15:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am Aaronson Andrew. This is my own work. NudistPhotographer (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Girl on top sex.webm

That's not educational. That's a porn movie, Commons is not a place for pornography. BZPN (talk) 15:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep COM:INUSE. 1989 (talk) 19:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Did you notice it had been kept 3 times already? When will self-styled censors give up? Pornography can be educational, and it's a valid encyclopedic topic. We are not going to host any and all pornography, but as 1989 points out, this is COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Italian_Region_Sicily_(non_correct_borders).svg

wrong unused old version, the correct one is File:Regione Sicilia 2.svg GioviPen ^{GP msg} 15:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "unused"? It's COM:INUSE. Do some work on Wikipedias. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek (now) is used only in the italian graphic lab that fixed the issue making the new file. GioviPen ^{GP msg} 22:28, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's a new situation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Architectural art "American Song" at Ted Weiss Federal Building, New York, New York LCCN2010720126.tif

Per COM:FOP US, freedom of panorama in the United States does not cover works of art. As the relief is central to this image, and as Highsmith didn't own the copyright to the relief, that makes this a derivative image of a non-free work. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I believe this is a really tricky one that probably should be taken to COM:VP/C. The question is just what is the threshold where the issue of lack of FoP for sculpture in the U.S. sets in for reliefs that are inherent portions of a building. Is it just the usual threshold of originality for the U.S., or is it something higher? Has this ever been tested in a U.S. court? E.g., if this image should be deleted, is File:Seattle - Portal to the Pacific 02.jpg (which I took) a problem, or is the relief there de minimis, or what? File:Seattle - Cristalla 05A.jpg is old enough to be OK, but what if it weren't? We probably have thousands of comparable longstanding files, so I think this merits more of a discussion than just a DR. - Jmabel ! talk 17:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my view, this probably does still qualify under COM:FOP US because arguably it's part of the design of the building and is thus an architectural detail that falls under the freedom of panorama clause (specifically, This includes style elements such as gargoyles and pillars, which are protected only from three-dimensional reproduction (Leicester v. Warner Bros.)). However, I am not going to leave a !vote on this nomination as of yet. Epicgenius (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do note that, per the English Wikipedia article, the relief was installed in 1995 - well after the lower portions of the building were completed. I feel like that would exclude it from being an architectural detail, as the initial installation was just a plain wall. It's a shame, because this is a great picture. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No issue bringing it up at VP/C, in case this is taken as establishing further precedent. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhat related but not exactly the same: the question regarding design elements of fences where a deletion request was concluded as "keep" — Commons:Deletion requests/File:Otter Tail County Historical Museum-05.jpg. Nakonana (talk) 19:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mappa regioni con movimenti indipendentisti.png

unused, unupdated or wrong information with no source or references, out of scope GioviPen ^{GP msg} 15:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader and I agree with the deletion. --Emme17 (talk) 17:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to say I was not the original uploader.-- Carnby (talk) 17:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Carnby i know, sorry the message was bcs of the tool GioviPen ^{GP msg} 18:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graphic art "Renewal" at Ted Weiss Federal Building, New York, New York LCCN2010720143.jpg

Per COM:FOP US, freedom of panorama in the United States does not cover works of art. As the painting is central to this image, and as Highsmith didn't own the copyright, and as the artist is still alive, that makes this a derivative image of a non-free work. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Architectural art "American Song" at Ted Weiss Federal Building, New York, New York LCCN2010720127.tif

Per COM:FOP US, freedom of panorama in the United States does not cover works of art. As the relief is central to this image, and as Highsmith didn't own the copyright to the relief, that makes this a derivative image of a non-free work. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This raises the identical issues as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Architectural art "American Song" at Ted Weiss Federal Building, New York, New York LCCN2010720126.tif, but for some reason the two were not combined. There is extensive discussion there, which the closing admin should consult before closing this. - Jmabel ! talk 18:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't consider them identical, as the other item could feasibly be deemed de minimis. This one very much is not. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ipsumlorem2 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope memes.

Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tarasov 2024 Italien.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Der.Traeumer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.windkanal.de/redaktion/redaktions-team Der.Traeumer (talk) 16:16, 6 December 2024 (UTC) Yann (talk) 15:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the source. Yann (talk) 16:36, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: So what is the source? Did Tarasov get it from Blockflute? Did they both get it from the same source? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:45, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but this is taken with a smartphone, so it could be the uploader's own work. Also the uploader was not informed. Yann (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: That photo has been on that page since 2024-09-25 09:27:33 (UTC), so it should be deleted here because we don't know under prp. I pinged the uploader. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:56, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, we need more information from the uploader, but I think that a regular DR is better. Yann (talk) 17:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait Huang Yong Ping, Monumenta 2016, Grand Palais, Paris - Photo. Fabrice Seixas.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://collection.sina.cn/youdiao/2016-05-10/detail-ifxryhhi8584493.d.html?vt=4 Yann (talk) 16:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcello Cotugno.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Bradipo Lento as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Previously published here: https://www.albatrosmagazine.net/coverstory/pronti-al-ritorno Yann (talk) 16:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battle of BK.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Jauhsekali as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: dubious license and source, reverse image search showed that the photo has been circulating in the internet for atleast a decade |source=https://lens.google.com/search?ep=gisbubu&hl=id&re=df&p=AbrfA8rs2whSgum3i4cRVeW6tsLjyGJBYELUz63dSMyhc_m4w33aO-9xTfCnaF7_SPq1pfiwBcJJzhj3CW_-POJWGb81uEVLaaganURSpikbpy_5Re-Trxito3eG_0EPAqXzJcm-7VbY94qYRo_nwu9WPkYkx7aHIct5xV85UXzYPUISvqxBeFRcRrsF4lUnowoPdAOHnEw5B76UdA%3D%3D#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDEsIkVrY0tKR0ZqWlRFNE1ERmxMVEk0TTJFdE5HSmhNaTA0Tm1FNUxUUm1NRE0xTkdRNVpXTmxZUklmWjE5T1dXUk5OV3RxU1hkV2MwWldkMUYzZG5veE4wY3lPREJETkU5U2F3PT0iLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLFtudWxsLG51bGwsW251bGwsWzAsMCwxMDAwMDAsMTAwMDAwXV1dLFsiMmU0NDI4ZDQtYmVjNC00YTk0LWFjNjAtOGE5OTExOTRhZjlhIl1d Yann (talk) 16:04, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo can be found on alamy with a file size of 28 MB. There it's published with the note: "This image is a public domain image, which means either that copyright has expired in the image or the copyright holder has waived their copyright." See [9]. Nakonana (talk) 20:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniela2e*** new.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Alabasterstein as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: here the name of the (possible) copyright holder is given https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Diff/250887562?title=Pierino_Ambrosoli_Foundation but not in the file declaration and there is no permission visible Yann (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artist Fred Bugs image.jpg

Copyright, Im me on pic 5.90.144.76 16:24, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iossif Spinel. Ivan the terrible 1942. Ivan and at the coffins of the executed Boyars with St. Philip, Metropolitan of Moscow.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Jaguarnik as no license (No license since)

1942 Russian artwork by an author who died in 1980, Undelete in 2055. Abzeronow (talk) 16:24, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected: File:Iossif Shpinel.jpg — a self-portrait by the same artist. Nakonana (talk) 20:30, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abstract pop artist Fred Bugs.jpg

Copyright reason..Im me and I want to delete the image 5.90.144.76 16:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arrowwoods.jpg

COM:NOTHOST, out of scope personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:42, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vinu Sridhar.jpg

COM:NOTHOST, out of scope personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:42, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Suraj Chuahan (talk · contribs)

COM:NOTHOST, out of scope personal photos.

Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Md. Kamrul Hasan.jpg

COM:NOTHOST, out of scope personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:47, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bebito con lentes.png

COM:NOTHOST, out of scope photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iron Man Model 70.jpg

Artwork under copyright Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per COM:NETCOPYVIO. Also note that this was tagged CSD before it was reverted by OP. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 18:50, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acetamidine.png

Low-quality/mixed-style; have a few higher-quality alts in Category:Acetamidines DMacks (talk) 18:13, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:5 Euro Pummerin.jpg

Per COM:CUR Austria and COM:CUR Euro. Absolutiva (talk) 18:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:N22978 5+2+1 cnt Lietuva 2015.jpg

Per COM:CUR Euro. Absolutiva (talk) 18:36, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LV 1 cents.png

Per COM:CUR Euro. Absolutiva (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep COM:CUR Euro just says copyright of national sides is regulated by national law, the file has always been clearly labeled as being in public domain in Latvia, besides it depicts coat of arms that also is out of copyright ~~Xil (talk) 20:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Superwholock.png

The "Who" wordmark of Doctor Who looks similar than Edge logo per COM:TOO UK Absolutiva (talk) 18:53, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kinti 2024.jpg

Derivative work of non free content. Also socking, DENY. Yann (talk) 19:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National side of Euro coins (50 cents)

Per COM:CUR Euro, only national sides of Euro coins (including commemorative coins) are copyrighted. --Absolutiva (talk) 19:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VEN1981.jpg

No information about currency in Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Venezuela. Yann (talk) 19:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:500 bolívares.jpg

No information about currency in Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Venezuela. Yann (talk) 19:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reverso de billete de 100 bolívares.jpg

No information about currency in Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Venezuela. Yann (talk) 19:33, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arabinose-1.png

Badly pixelated. Have File:DL-Arabinose.svg as high quality replacement. Note, I'm having trouble logging into wiktionary to replace the one use-case there. DMacks (talk) 19:42, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I agree. --Pion (talk) 20:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eudesmol.png

Somewhat pixelated; File:Beta-Eudesmol.png is higher quality and also more specifically identifies the individual isomer of the Category:Eudesmol chemicals DMacks (talk) 19:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alpha-eudesmol.png

Missing all stereochemistry. Replaced by File:Alpha-Eudesmol.png that has it. DMacks (talk) 20:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And likewise:

File:Beta-eudesmol.png → File:Beta-Eudesmol.png

DMacks (talk) 20:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it is some historic pictures. Since now there is better version, please delete it. --Pion (talk) 20:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:【感謝の気持ちを込めて】「i☆Ris the Movie - Full Energy!! -」スペシャルサンクスムービー（サムネイル）.jpg

Animation screenshot not cc-by shizhao (talk) 02:47, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete criteria F1. Dmartin969 (talk) 06:01, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The source is under a free license, so some more investigation is needed. Yann (talk) 20:13, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per w:Iris the Movie: Full Energy!! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:【凱旋舞台挨拶チケット発売中！(岐阜もいくよ)】「鳴かぬなら殺してしまえほととぎす」を-若井友希が詠むと？｜i☆Ris 劇場版アニメ大ヒット上映中！ -i Ris -i Risアニメ.webm

Animation video not cc-by shizhao (talk) 02:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete criteria F1. Dmartin969 (talk) 06:01, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Yann. --Achim55 (talk) 12:05, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the file, as the source shows a free license, so some more investigation is needed. Yann (talk) 20:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)*[reply]

Keep per w:Iris the Movie: Full Energy!! Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hajjare (talk · contribs)

I don't understand how all of these pictures are in scope. User's edits are mostly them mass uploading hundreds of personal family pictures like them.

Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 20:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think some of these photos show people in beautiful clothes that are in scope, so I'd tend to oppose a blanket deletion, and therefore vote to Keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All low resolution. Most of them have no EXIF data, but some have. Some have a timestamp printed into the image. Unlikely all own work. Perhaps some are, but we cannot trust. --Krd 08:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I remind you that small size and lack of EXIF are not deletion reasons per se, per COM:DR. And I quote: small size and missing EXIF data" is not a deletion reason by itself" (at best that is merely supporting evidence for copyvio). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Krd, some of these photos are noteworthy.

Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're agreeing with me. I may have missed it, but I don't the Krd said anything about any of these photos being noteworthy. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:16, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough. I meant those photos are particularly noteworthy because it's visible they're screenshots and not own works. I think they're taken from elsewhere and uploaded here. All of them are unused and low resolution providing no educational use here. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If they're screenshots, they have to be deleted unless the copyright-holder gives permission. But how can you tell they're screenshots? Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at the last photo

; a screenshot button is visible near the face and also black bars on all of them. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 08:30, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beautiful mother and their children's.jpg (look at the logo, definitely not own work)
File:Beautiful Women with new baby 5.jpg (same issue as above)
File:Naming ceremony 4.jpg (professional logo + screenshot button)
File:Women ceremony picture 35.jpg (same button issue as above)
File:Lady 3.jpg (black and white with useless emojis)
File:Naming ceremony 11.jpg (same emoji issue as above)

Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 08:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm impressed that you actually looked at every one of these images. So therefore, Delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Ikan Kekek, you're doing a great job too, and I really appreciate your work! Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's really a shame because a lot of them give a nice insight in traditional Nigerian clothing. Nakonana (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Faustosilva2022.jpg

File does not have creative commons license NullReason (talk) 21:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lily kempson.webp

Out of scope: speculative AI-generated image of a real person; almost certainly inaccurate, and no educational value. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ai Lily Kempson.webp, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Image 27-11-2024 at 10.22.jpg. Omphalographer (talk) 21:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monopole 3D radiation pattern 0.25.png

I accidentally created it as a duplicate of another file in this series. It's name is inconsistent with the others Chetvorno (talk) 21:40, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aerial photos of Jarrell tornado damage by Troy Kimmel

Aa credited at the source itself, these three images were all taken by academic and broadcast meteorologist Troy Kimmel. The uploader sourced them from an ArcGIS "Storymap" published by the National Weather Service, on the basis that they were in the Public Domain because they had been created by an employee of the US Federal Government in the performance of their duties.

However:

there is no evidence that Troy Kimmel was a federal employee performing his duties (or has ever been an employee of the US federal government)
there is no claim at the source that these images are in the public domain or licensed under a free license

As photos taken in the United States after 1989, they are therefore protected by copyright and we cannot host them here.

Really, this is a COM:NETCOPYVIO, but given the history of NWS-related DRs over the last few months, I'm just opening it as a regular DR.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

--Rlandmann (talk) 21:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sajid Anwar.jpg

Out of scope : Advertising or self-promotion. Riad Salih (talk) 21:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:14, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ساجد محمود انور.jpg

Out of scope : Advertising or self-promotion. Riad Salih (talk) 21:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:14, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roman Gineyko (left) with Maciej Maslowski (right) and Wladyslaw Kowalski, Otrebusy, Poland, ca 1943.jpg

historic photo, unlikely Own work Ankry (talk) 22:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stanisław Masłowski, Polish painter artist at his atelier, ca 1900.jpg

Likely {{PD-old-assumed}} but dubious Own work. Ankry (talk) 22:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Magazines established in 1937

Per [10], the illustrator signing as Guillermo was Guillermo Pérez Baylo (1911–2000), so these are still protected in Spain as well as the US. The files can be restored in 2071.

Rosenzweig τ 22:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment oops, sure. I'm the uploader and these drawings, as well as "File:Revista Renacer N.º 2 1938 Hitler.jpg", are Baylo's work. I apologize for not being careful enough, I thought the pics were free to use just because they are available at the Biblioteca Nacional de España site. I use to be careful with the authorship of photographs, but I did not realize that these drawings may be protected, too. Yes, Baylo passed away in 2000, so I'm afraid that the images must be deleted for now. I will pay more attention to this issue in the future, sorry for the inconvenience. PedroAcero76 (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Narrenmuseum Niggelturm (Gengenbach)

Urheberrechtsverletzung; keine Panoramafreiheit für abgebildete Fotografien.

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:40, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jmsv.jpg

The artist Guillermo Pérez Bailo died in 2000, so this is not in the public domain yet in both Spain and the US, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2071. Rosenzweig τ 22:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2020 09 18 Wien 165644 402 (50358698951).jpg

Poster temporarily installed in Vienna. Although Austria has a freedom of panorama exception in their legislation, it doesn't apply to temporary artworks. Günther Frager (talk) 00:00, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]