Common Law Marriage: A Legal Institution for CohabitationThe extraordinary recent increase in rates of cohabitation and non-marital birth presents a major challenge to traditional family law principles, and the legal rules governing cohabitation are thus among the most hotly contested areas of family law and policy today. In many nations, courts, legislatures, and law-reform bodies are "reinventing" common law marriage, seemingly without any sense of its history, doctrinal development, or limitations. The current law surrounding common law marriage is extremely complex. Professor Göran Lind has undertaken the demanding task of writing the most well-researched text on this topic to date. Separated into three Parts, Common Law Marriage covers the origins of the doctrine, its legal aspects in modern America, and the future of cohabitation law across the globe and in the 11 American jurisdictions that currently recognize common law marriage. It provides a cultural and historical history of the subject, from Ancient Roman Law to Medieval Canon Law, and analyzes over 2,000 American cases which have utilized the doctrine. This timely book is an excellent resource for scholars, legislators, and policymakers who are interested in the complex legalities of common law marriage. |
Other editions - View all
Common Law Marriage:A Legal Institution for Cohabitation: A Legal ... Goran Lind No preview available - 2008 |
Common terms and phrases
accepted according actions actual addition agreed agreement American appears applied canon ceremonial marriage Chapter circumstances cited claim clear CODE ANN cohabitation cohabitation and reputation commencement common law marriage Compare concerning consensus consent consequently considered constitute continued couple court found Court of Appeals death despite discussed dissolved effects elements entered established Estate evidence evidentiary example existence expression fact followed formal further future given holding husband and wife Idaho impediment inferred intent invalid Iowa issue later legislation limited lived maintained man’s marital marriage contract married Matter ment Mont mutual necessary objective Ohio Okla Pa.Super parties Pennsylvania period persons present presumption principle proof proven question reasoning recognized reference relation relationship removal requirement respect riage Roman seen separate significance simply spouses statement status sufficient supra note Supreme Court Texas tion United valid viewed wedding woman York