User talk:Buckland1072

Hi Buckland1072! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

‘St Peter’s and St Paul’s’, Forncett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eagleash (talk) 19:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw your Teahouse post about an English article for Dorothy Adamson. Do you happen to have access to newspapers.com, or another service for obtaining old newspaper articles? Newspapers.com has mostly United States newspapers, but I did a search for Dorothy Adamson, in 1934, location England, and found a June 1, 1934 article in the Liverpool Echo that has some useful information about the artist. I did a search at Google Books and found information about her in a 1924 issue of The Studio. Google Books also brought up some books she illustrated, which might be useful to show her art work was being purchased. I believe enough references could be found for an English article about her.

I know nothing about her, so I'm not interested in writing about her, but if you'd like me to send you reference citations, and basic information found at what I consider to be good references, I could do so, though it would take me a few days to get everything together. You probably don't want to share your email address with a stranger, so I can't send you the entire Liverpool Echo article, but I can write up the gist of the article. Let me know if you want some help with gathering references. Karenthewriter (talk) 17:36, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karenthewriter Thanks for your kind and helpful message and your really useful references. I have access to Find My Past's newspaper index but hadn't come across the Liverpool Echo article you mentioned. I'll have another search and see if I can find it. I haven't ever used Google Books either, so that's a great tool, and I'll follow it up. I found the Teahouse comments and suggestions helpful in the context of understanding more about Wikipedia's principles etc (I'm still pretty new to it all) and am really digesting that and what, if anything, I might do regarding an article. I really appreciate your offer to help with gathering references, I don't want to waste your time doing that if I decide not to draft an article though. What I've done for the moment is pass on the facts I have to ArtistsBiographies.com so the correct info is available online somewhere. May be I can get in touch if I decide to draft an article please? Thanks again. Buckland1072 (talk) 20:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Buckland. I offered help in collecting references, and that offer hasn't gone away.

The Liverpool Echo article on Dorothy Adamson is in the June 1, 1934 issue, page 13. The title is Where Are The "Lost" Pictures? – A Woman Artist's Works For Liverpool, written by the Echo Art Critic. Here is the copy:

Five months ago Merseyside and North Wales lost a brilliant woman artist. An exhibition of her work is now included in that of the Liverpool Academy (of which she was a member) at the Bluecoat Chambers.

Miss Dorothy Adamson, R.I., R.O.I., died at a comparatively early age. A self-portrait in perfect tone and color – one of those already purchased from the exhibition – shows her in 1927, when she would be, perhaps, about 27 years of age.

To-day the city of Liverpool acquired, for the permanent collection at the Walker Art Gallery, two of her works from the exhibition – "Goats," priced at 30 pounds [my computer doesn't have the pound symbol] and "Grouse," priced at 15 guineas.

In the exhibition at the Bluecoat there are fifty-seven works. How they were accumulated is a surprising story.

First of all, at her home at Bettas-y-Coed were discovered about a dozen pictures in frames.

AS SHE HAD LEFT THEM

But Miss Adamson had been a prolific worker, and this did not satisfy the president of the Liverpool Academy, Mr. R. G. Hinchliffe, who, thereupon, urged Mr. Adamson, the artist's brother, to do all he could to find more. In her studio some were unearthed, while others were found at the houses of friends, she had visited.

Gems of her work, they were found as she herself had left them, not only torn off their wooden stretchers, but piled up face to face and some tightly rolled up – a dire fate for paintings in oil.

Mr. Hinchliffe parted paintings, and even ironed some of them out.

Yet many large paintings had, apparently, disappeared. Even her big study of cattle, which had been hung on the line at the Royal Academy, was not be be found.

AMAZING FACILITY

It was concluded that either the artist had over-painted her own work or had herself destroyed it. "You see," Mr. Will Penn told me, "Dorothy Adamson had no sense of the value of her own work. She simply would not take her extraordinary ability seriously. She would actually 'knock off' an elaborate animal study in a few hours, and do it perfectly."

With water-color and crayon, as with oil, Miss Adamson worked magic, as so many of the present exhibit show; and there is no question that the two little masterpieces now acquired by the City of Liverpool indeed will "live."

GEORGE WHITFIELD Karenthewriter (talk) 22:57, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. That's a sad story. Some of the pictures I've seen online are so lovely. Best wishes Buckland1072 (talk) 16:39, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Buckland1072! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article on British artist Dorothy Adamson (1893-1934), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 03:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Buckland1072 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

my IP address has been blocked (says multiple issues) I think this must be in error. I only edit Operation Tabarin article at present and do not believe I've done anything that could harm Wikipedia. last used it to edit on 7 Feb. On 13 Feb the block was on. The IP address is for my home laptop, that only I use and the home next work is only accessible to me and my husband Buckland1072 (talk) 17:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 17:55, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Buckland1072 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry I did not know I needed to include my IP address. The block on my IP address is for my home wifi router and personal laptop. Today the public IPv4 is 2.30.70.108 but on 2/3/23 it was 2.31.135.57 (I don't have an IPv6). I am not very technically competent but having read the web page recommended by Yamla I think I must have a dynamic public IP. I have read the recommended guide to appealing blocks and am sure I have not done anything stated there, so I believe the block is to do with a range of IP addresses being blocked, and mine happens to be in the range. I am an admirer of Wikipedia and would never do anything to disrupt it. I class myself as a newish. technically simplistic editor and am very sorry if I've accidentally done something wrong. The block message does not explain what I have done wrong. I have today switched on VPN protection on my laptop, in case that helps. Thank you for your consideration. Buckland1072 (talk) 15:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That IP address is not blocked. However, you state you used a VPN. You need to disable your VPN and wait a full 24 hours for the block to clear. If you are still unable to do so after that, please make a new request. Yamla (talk) 16:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.