iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.

I/239/hd_notes

Hipparcos notes: Double and multiple systems (2622 rows)

Full	HIP	Note2	Ntot	Nline	Text
1	252		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
2	252		2	2	magnitude diff. = 3.96, pos.angle = 176 deg, separation = 0.69 arcsec.
3	267		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
4	267		2	2	magnitude diff. = 3.28, pos.angle = 267 deg, separation = 1.26 arcsec.
5	365		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
6	365		2	2	magnitude diff. = 3.68, pos.angle = 169 deg, separation = 0.51 arcsec.
7	455		3	1	Ambiguous double-star solution of HIP 455 + 465.
8	455		3	2	An alternative solution for HIP 455 gives:
9	455		3	3	magnitude diff. = 0.35, pos.angle = 227 deg, separation = 0.30 arcsec.
10	465		1	1	See HIP 455.
11	487		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
12	487		2	2	magnitude diff. = 4.24, pos.angle = 3 deg, separation = 0.64 arcsec.
13	570		3	1	Ambiguous double-star solution of HIP 570 + 571.
14	570		3	2	An alternative solution for HIP 570 relative to HIP 571 gives:
15	570		3	3	magnitude diff. = 1.43, pos.angle = 204 deg, separation = 20.34 arcsec.
16	571		1	1	See HIP 570.
17	673		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
18	673		2	2	magnitude diff. = 3.02, pos.angle = 323 deg, separation = 0.64 arcsec.
19	683		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
20	683		2	2	magnitude diff. = 4.20, pos.angle = 344 deg, separation = 0.79 arcsec.
21	779		4	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
22	779		4	2	magnitude diff. = 3.74, pos.angle = 269 deg, separation = 1.53 arcsec.
23	779		4	3	An alternative VIM solution for this system gives position angle 200 deg
24	779		4	4	for the constant star relative to the variable.
25	871		4	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
26	871		4	2	magnitude diff. = 0.21, pos.angle = 250 deg, separation = 21.19 arcsec.
27	871		4	3	An alternative VIM solution for this system gives position angle 54 deg
28	871		4	4	for the constant star relative to the variable.
29	965		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
30	965		2	2	magnitude diff. = 3.50, pos.angle = 282 deg, separation = 5.06 arcsec.
31	1068		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AS gives:
32	1068		2	2	magnitude diff. = 0.40, pos.angle = 172 deg, separation = 0.38 arcsec.
33	1082		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for BA gives:
34	1082		2	2	magnitude diff. = 0.22, pos.angle = 307 deg, separation = 5.10 arcsec.
35	1098		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
36	1098		2	2	magnitude diff. = 2.81, pos.angle = 194 deg, separation = 0.83 arcsec.
37	1244		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
38	1244		2	2	magnitude diff. = 3.18, pos.angle = 282 deg, separation = 1.66 arcsec.
39	1393		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
40	1393		2	2	magnitude diff. = 2.68, pos.angle = 140 deg, separation = 0.18 arcsec.
41	1723		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
42	1723		2	2	magnitude diff. = 1.77, pos.angle = 4 deg, separation = 0.25 arcsec.
43	1732		1	1	Component B is really the photocentre of BC.
44	2033		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
45	2033		2	2	magnitude diff. = 3.89, pos.angle = 325 deg, separation = 7.13 arcsec.
46	2271	P	2	1	The double-star analysis indicates that it may be the fainter (B)
47	2271	P	2	2	component which is variable.
48	2411		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:
49	2411		2	2	magnitude diff. = 2.58, pos.angle = 198 deg, separation = 1.53 arcsec.
50	2438		2	1	Ambiguous double-star solution. An alternative solution for AB gives:

Result truncated to 50 rows

I/239/hg_notes

The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues (ESA 1997)

ReadMe+ftp

1997HIP...C......0E

Hipparcos notes: General notes (3898 rows)

Full	HIP	Ntot	Nline	Text
1	353	5	1	Investigations carried out after the main catalogue was finalised led to
2	353	5	2	a more likely solution for this entry (standard errors in parentheses):
3	353	5	3	RA = 1.11103134 (1.96), Dec = -44.56734218 (1.71), Par = 5.62 (2.78),
4	353	5	4	PM_RA = 233.87 (2.52), PM_Dec = 20.40 (2.60),
5	353	5	5	with F1 = 0 and F2 = 0.56, and processed as single star.
6	371	2	1	Inconsistency with the Hipparcos Input Catalogue: not the proper-motion
7	371	2	2	star L 218-8, Sm 152.
8	374	6	1	Triple system with two catalogue entries, HIP 374 and HIP 375. The
9	374	6	2	Hp magnitude given in the main catalogue is derived directly from
10	374	6	3	the photon counts recorded with the detector pointing at HIP 374
11	374	6	4	and has not been corrected for the multiplicity effect or for the
12	374	6	5	attenuation profile of the detector. The corrected magnitudes of
13	374	6	6	the components are given in the Double and Multiple Systems Annex.
14	375	6	1	Triple system with two catalogue entries, HIP 374 and HIP 375. The
15	375	6	2	Hp magnitude given in the main catalogue is derived directly from
16	375	6	3	the photon counts recorded with the detector pointing at HIP 375
17	375	6	4	and has not been corrected for the multiplicity effect or for the
18	375	6	5	attenuation profile of the detector. The corrected magnitudes of
19	375	6	6	the components are given in the Double and Multiple Systems Annex.
20	421	4	1	Stochastic solution was rejected because it had a cosmic error greater
21	421	4	2	than 100 mas.
22	421	4	3	This entry may correspond to the Tycho Catalogue entry
23	421	4	4	TYC 3246-2535-1 at RA = 1.283785 deg, Dec = +45.225722 deg.
24	428	2	1	This star is now in the CCDM as 00057+4548 F. (J. Dommanget, O. Nys,
25	428	2	2	Bull. Inf. CDS 46, 13, 1995)
26	464	5	1	Investigations carried out after the main catalogue was finalised led to
27	464	5	2	a more likely solution for this entry (standard errors in parentheses):
28	464	5	3	RA = 1.38388301 (3.38), Dec = -31.96763699 (2.27), Par = 5.02 (4.59),
29	464	5	4	PM_RA = 24.34 (4.67), PM_Dec = 5.33 (5.67),
30	464	5	5	with F1 = 13 and F2 = -1.64, and processed as single star.
31	551	2	1	Inconsistency with the Hipparcos Input Catalogue: possibly not the
32	551	2	2	proper-motion star LP 524-104.
33	933	5	1	Investigations carried out after the main catalogue was finalised led to
34	933	5	2	a more likely solution for this entry (standard errors in parentheses):
35	933	5	3	RA = 2.89829566 (1.61), Dec = 7.12150958 (1.14), Par = 3.30 (1.93),
36	933	5	4	PM_RA = 3.49 (1.84), PM_Dec = -4.74 (1.15),
37	933	5	5	with F1 = 6 and F2 = -0.12, and processed as single star.
38	1006	5	1	Investigations carried out after the main catalogue was finalised led to
39	1006	5	2	a more likely solution for this entry (standard errors in parentheses):
40	1006	5	3	RA = 3.13913628 (3.57), Dec = 21.71414008 (1.86), Par = 34.40 (4.02),
41	1006	5	4	PM_RA = 190.43 (3.96), PM_Dec = -287.04 (2.24),
42	1006	5	5	with F1 = 6 and F2 = -1.18, and processed as single star.
43	1050	3	1	Inconsistency with the Hipparcos Input Catalogue: the proper-motion star
44	1050	3	2	BPM 84084, LP 524-106 is probably 30 arcsec SE
45	1050	3	3	of BD +04 19.
46	1299	5	1	Investigations carried out after the main catalogue was finalised led to
47	1299	5	2	a more likely solution for this entry (standard errors in parentheses):
48	1299	5	3	RA = 4.08276307 (1.30), Dec = -33.46932829 (1.03), Par = 12.74 (1.60),
49	1299	5	4	PM_RA = 50.58 (1.62), PM_Dec = -41.67 (1.33),
50	1299	5	5	with F1 = 0 and F2 = -1.43, and processed as single star.

Result truncated to 50 rows

I/239/hp_notes

The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues (ESA 1997)

ReadMe+ftp

1997HIP...C......0E

Hipparcos notes: Photometric notes (2444 rows)

Full	HIP	Ntot	Nline	Text
1	8	1	1	Ephemeris based on AAVSO data.
2	63	1	1	Period from Ref 84.043 confirmed.
3	96	1	1	This could be an eclipsing star, but insufficient data.
4	181	1	1	Possible period p=10.29d.
5	302	1	1	Possible period p=20.9d.
6	344	1	1	Ephemeris based on AAVSO data.
7	457	1	1	Could be SR with p=500d.
8	470	1	1	Possible period p=4.434d.
9	473	1	1	Not variable in Hipparcos data.
10	500	1	1	Possible period p=22d.
11	520	1	1	Possible period p=163d.
12	590	1	1	Possible period p=3.6d.
13	610	1	1	Possible period p=0.83035d.
14	677	1	1	Possible period p=0.9990d.
15	696	1	1	Possible period p=23.8d.
16	703	1	1	Ephemeris based on AAVSO data.
17	720	1	1	Possible period p=3.9d.
18	746	1	1	Period from Ref 94.191 confirmed.
19	750	1	1	May be eclipsing variable, p=6.447d.
20	781	1	1	Ephemeris based on AAVSO data.
21	817	1	1	Period could be half, but then no secondary minimum visible.
22	852	1	1	Possible period p=24.08d.
23	989	1	1	Spurious periods can be detected.
24	999	1	1	Possible confirmation of period from Ref 95.389.
25	1032	1	1	Possible period p=3.337d.
26	1086	1	1	Possibly variable with p=1.1545d.
27	1124	1	1	Possible period p=7.46d.
28	1126	1	1	Could possibly be EA type variable.
29	1131	1	1	Possible period p=53.7d.
30	1146	1	1	Possible period p=9.82d.
31	1158	1	1	Possible period p=12.987d.
32	1170	1	1	Possible period p=19.25d.
33	1182	1	1	Type EW and not RRc with p=0.1821789d.
34	1210	1	1	Data inadequate for confirmation of period from Ref 94.191.
35	1325	1	1	Possible period p=13.0d.
36	1352	1	1	Possible period p=11.78d.
37	1401	1	1	Some signs of eclipses?
38	1497	1	1	Possible period p=7.606d.
39	1543	1	1	Data inadequate for confirmation of period from Ref 94.191.
40	1555	1	1	Possible period p=22.63d.
41	1609	1	1	Possible period p=9.33d.
42	1627	1	1	Possible period p=414d.
43	1652	1	1	Possible period p=500d.
44	1728	1	1	Possible period p=158.0d.
45	1792	1	1	At times periodic (p=34.46d), or constant (Ref 83.080).
46	1799	1	1	Period in Ref 85.074 confirmed.
47	1805	2	1	Part of double system, component at 9.7 arcsec appears brighter than
48	1805	2	2	stated in Hipparcos Input Catalogue.
49	1834	1	1	Ephemeris based on AAVSO data.
50	1843	1	1	Possible period p=125d.

Result truncated to 50 rows

VizieR

VizieR